Cargando…

The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications

Inaccurate data in scientific papers can result from honest error or intentional falsification. This study attempted to determine the percentage of published papers that contain inappropriate image duplication, a specific type of inaccurate data. The images from a total of 20,621 papers published in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Bik, Elisabeth M., Casadevall, Arturo, Fang, Ferric C.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	American Society for Microbiology 2016
Materias:	Perspective
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4941872/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27273827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00809-16

Ejemplares similares

Testing Hypotheses on Risk Factors for Scientific Misconduct via Matched-Control Analysis of Papers Containing Problematic Image Duplications
por: Fanelli, Daniele, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Do individual and institutional predictors of misconduct vary by country? Results of a matched-control analysis of problematic image duplications
por: Fanelli, Daniele, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Causes for the Persistence of Impact Factor Mania
por: Casadevall, Arturo, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Graduate Biomedical Science Education Needs a New Philosophy
por: Bosch, Gundula, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications
por: Stern, Andrew M, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Research Funding: the Case for a Modified Lottery
por: Fang, Ferric C., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Reply to “Funding by Lottery: Political Problems and Research Opportunities”
por: Casadevall, Arturo, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Erratum for Fang and Casadevall, Research Funding: the Case for a Modified Lottery
por: Fang, Ferric C., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Publication planning: promoting an ethics of transparency and integrity in biomedical research
por: DeTora, L., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Males Are Overrepresented among Life Science Researchers Committing Scientific Misconduct
por: Fang, Ferric C., et al.
Publicado: (2013)

No room for ambiguity: The concepts of appropriate and inappropriate authorship in scientific publications
por: Ali, Mohammad Javed
Publicado: (2021)

Steps Toward Minimal Reporting Standards for Lipidomics Mass Spectrometry in Biomedical Research Publications
por: O’Donnell, Valerie B., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Antimicrobial Actions of Reactive Oxygen Species
por: Fang, Ferric C.
Publicado: (2011)

Revolutionary Science
por: Casadevall, Arturo, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Rigorous Science: a How-To Guide
por: Casadevall, Arturo, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Moonshot Science—Risks and Benefits
por: Casadevall, Arturo, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Impacted Science: Impact Is Not Importance
por: Casadevall, Arturo, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Field Science—the Nature and Utility of Scientific Fields
por: Casadevall, Arturo, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Causes for the Persistence of Impact Factor Mania
por: Casadevall, Arturo, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Reply to Argüelles and Argüelles-Prieto, “Are the Editors Responsible for Our Obsession with the Impact Factor?”
por: Casadevall, Arturo, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Elegant Science
por: Casadevall, Arturo, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Alliance for biomedical research in Europe
por: Smith, Ulf, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Leveraging the national cyberinfrastructure for biomedical research
por: LeDuc, Richard, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Should biomedical research be like Airbnb?
por: Bonazzi, Vivien R., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Biomedical research in Nigeria: realities and misconceptions
por: Garba, Bashiru, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

How to integrate biological research into society and exclude errors in biomedical publications? Progress in theoretical and systems biology releases pressure on experimental research
por: Volkov, Vadim
Publicado: (2014)

Passive Antibody Administration (Immediate Immunity) as a Specific Defense Against Biological Weapons
por: Casadevall, Arturo
Publicado: (2002)

NIH peer review percentile scores are poorly predictive of grant productivity
por: Fang, Ferric C, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Empowering grassroots innovation to accelerate biomedical research
por: Greshake Tzovaras, Bastian, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Biomedical research and dissemination: The value of global collaborations
por: Kramer, Barnett S., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The NIH public access policy did not harm biomedical journals
por: Peterson, A. Townsend, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Article-level assessment of influence and translation in biomedical research
por: Santangelo, George M.
Publicado: (2017)

Improving target assessment in biomedical research: the GOT-IT recommendations
por: Emmerich, Christoph H., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Complex determinants of inappropriate use of antibiotics
por: Tangcharoensathien, Viroj, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A Framework for Improving the Quality of Research in the Biological Sciences
por: Casadevall, Arturo, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Microbial Science Research in the Post-COVID Environment
por: Nguyen, Nguyen K., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Maximizing the return on taxpayers' investments in fundamental biomedical research
por: Lorsch, Jon R.
Publicado: (2015)

Developing a culture of safety in biomedical research training
por: Bond, Michelle R., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Maximizing biomedical research impacts through bioethical considerations
por: Tornini, Valerie A., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

A historical perspective of biomedical explainable AI research
por: Malinverno, Luca, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_jnacg5sh6t3ob0gji79e44bjb9