Cargando…

Bioaerosol sampling for the detection of aerosolized influenza virus

Background Influenza virus was used to characterize the efficacy of a cyclone‐based, two‐stage personal bioaerosol sampler for the collection and size fractionation of aerosolized viral particles. Methods A Collison single‐jet nebulizer was used to aerosolize the attenuated FluMist® vaccine into a c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blachere, Francoise M., Lindsley, William G., Slaven, James E., Green, Brett J., Anderson, Stacey E., Chen, Bean T., Beezhold, Don H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4941879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19453416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2007.00020.x
_version_ 1782442356908228608
author Blachere, Francoise M.
Lindsley, William G.
Slaven, James E.
Green, Brett J.
Anderson, Stacey E.
Chen, Bean T.
Beezhold, Don H.
author_facet Blachere, Francoise M.
Lindsley, William G.
Slaven, James E.
Green, Brett J.
Anderson, Stacey E.
Chen, Bean T.
Beezhold, Don H.
author_sort Blachere, Francoise M.
collection PubMed
description Background Influenza virus was used to characterize the efficacy of a cyclone‐based, two‐stage personal bioaerosol sampler for the collection and size fractionation of aerosolized viral particles. Methods A Collison single‐jet nebulizer was used to aerosolize the attenuated FluMist® vaccine into a calm‐air settling chamber. Viral particles were captured with bioaerosol samplers that utilize 2 microcentrifuge tubes to collect airborne particulates. The first tube (T1) collects particles greater than 1.8 μm in diameter, while the second tube (T2) collects particles between 1.0 and 1.8 μm, and the back‐up filter (F) collects submicron particles. Following aerosolization, quantitative PCR was used to detect and quantify H1N1 and H3N2 influenza strains. Results Based on qPCR results, we demonstrate that aerosolized viral particles were efficiently collected and separated according to aerodynamic size using the two‐stage bioaerosol sampler. Most viral particles were collected in T2 (1‐1.8 μm) and on the back‐up filter (< 1 μm) of the bioaerosol sampler. Furthermore, we found that the detection of viral particles with the two‐stage sampler was directly proportional to the collection time. Consequently, viral particle counts were significantly greater at 40 minutes in comparison to 5, 10 and 20 minute aerosol collection points. Conclusions Due to a lack of empirical data, aerosol transmission of influenza is often questioned. Using FluMist®, we demonstrated that a newly developed bioaerosol sampler is able to recover and size fractionate aerosolized viral particles. This sampler should be an important tool for studying viral transmission in clinical settings and may significantly contribute towards understanding the modes of influenza virus transmission.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4941879
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49418792016-07-20 Bioaerosol sampling for the detection of aerosolized influenza virus Blachere, Francoise M. Lindsley, William G. Slaven, James E. Green, Brett J. Anderson, Stacey E. Chen, Bean T. Beezhold, Don H. Influenza Other Respir Viruses Original Articles Background Influenza virus was used to characterize the efficacy of a cyclone‐based, two‐stage personal bioaerosol sampler for the collection and size fractionation of aerosolized viral particles. Methods A Collison single‐jet nebulizer was used to aerosolize the attenuated FluMist® vaccine into a calm‐air settling chamber. Viral particles were captured with bioaerosol samplers that utilize 2 microcentrifuge tubes to collect airborne particulates. The first tube (T1) collects particles greater than 1.8 μm in diameter, while the second tube (T2) collects particles between 1.0 and 1.8 μm, and the back‐up filter (F) collects submicron particles. Following aerosolization, quantitative PCR was used to detect and quantify H1N1 and H3N2 influenza strains. Results Based on qPCR results, we demonstrate that aerosolized viral particles were efficiently collected and separated according to aerodynamic size using the two‐stage bioaerosol sampler. Most viral particles were collected in T2 (1‐1.8 μm) and on the back‐up filter (< 1 μm) of the bioaerosol sampler. Furthermore, we found that the detection of viral particles with the two‐stage sampler was directly proportional to the collection time. Consequently, viral particle counts were significantly greater at 40 minutes in comparison to 5, 10 and 20 minute aerosol collection points. Conclusions Due to a lack of empirical data, aerosol transmission of influenza is often questioned. Using FluMist®, we demonstrated that a newly developed bioaerosol sampler is able to recover and size fractionate aerosolized viral particles. This sampler should be an important tool for studying viral transmission in clinical settings and may significantly contribute towards understanding the modes of influenza virus transmission. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2007-10-22 2007-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4941879/ /pubmed/19453416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2007.00020.x Text en
spellingShingle Original Articles
Blachere, Francoise M.
Lindsley, William G.
Slaven, James E.
Green, Brett J.
Anderson, Stacey E.
Chen, Bean T.
Beezhold, Don H.
Bioaerosol sampling for the detection of aerosolized influenza virus
title Bioaerosol sampling for the detection of aerosolized influenza virus
title_full Bioaerosol sampling for the detection of aerosolized influenza virus
title_fullStr Bioaerosol sampling for the detection of aerosolized influenza virus
title_full_unstemmed Bioaerosol sampling for the detection of aerosolized influenza virus
title_short Bioaerosol sampling for the detection of aerosolized influenza virus
title_sort bioaerosol sampling for the detection of aerosolized influenza virus
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4941879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19453416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2007.00020.x
work_keys_str_mv AT blacherefrancoisem bioaerosolsamplingforthedetectionofaerosolizedinfluenzavirus
AT lindsleywilliamg bioaerosolsamplingforthedetectionofaerosolizedinfluenzavirus
AT slavenjamese bioaerosolsamplingforthedetectionofaerosolizedinfluenzavirus
AT greenbrettj bioaerosolsamplingforthedetectionofaerosolizedinfluenzavirus
AT andersonstaceye bioaerosolsamplingforthedetectionofaerosolizedinfluenzavirus
AT chenbeant bioaerosolsamplingforthedetectionofaerosolizedinfluenzavirus
AT beezholddonh bioaerosolsamplingforthedetectionofaerosolizedinfluenzavirus