Cargando…

Sensitivity and specificity of rapid influenza testing of children in a community setting

Please cite this paper as: Stebbins et al. (2011) Sensitivity and specificity of rapid influenza testing of children in a community setting. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 5(2), 104–109. Introduction  Rapid influenza testing (RFT) allows for a rapid point‐of‐care diagnosis of influenza. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stebbins, Samuel, Stark, James H., Prasad, Ramakrishna, Thompson, William W., Mitruka, Kiren, Rinaldo, Charles, Vukotich, Charles J., Cummings, Derek A. T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4942005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21306573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2010.00171.x
_version_ 1782442367760990208
author Stebbins, Samuel
Stark, James H.
Prasad, Ramakrishna
Thompson, William W.
Mitruka, Kiren
Rinaldo, Charles
Vukotich, Charles J.
Cummings, Derek A. T.
author_facet Stebbins, Samuel
Stark, James H.
Prasad, Ramakrishna
Thompson, William W.
Mitruka, Kiren
Rinaldo, Charles
Vukotich, Charles J.
Cummings, Derek A. T.
author_sort Stebbins, Samuel
collection PubMed
description Please cite this paper as: Stebbins et al. (2011) Sensitivity and specificity of rapid influenza testing of children in a community setting. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 5(2), 104–109. Introduction  Rapid influenza testing (RFT) allows for a rapid point‐of‐care diagnosis of influenza. The Quidel QuickVue(®) Influenza A+B test (QuickVue) has a reported manufacturer’s sensitivity and specificity of 73% and 96%, respectively, with nasal swabs. However, investigators have shown sensitivities ranging from 22% to 77% in community settings. Methods  The QuickVue rapid influenza test was evaluated in a population of elementary (K‐5) school children, using testing in the home, as part of the Pittsburgh Influenza Prevention Project during the 2007–2008 influenza season. The QuickVue test was performed with nasal swab in full accordance with package instructions and compared with the results of nasal swab semi‐quantitative RT‐PCR. Results  Sensitivity of the QuickVue was found to be 27% in this sample. There was no statistically valid correlation between the semi‐quantitative PCR result and the QuickVue result. Conclusions  This study is consistent with the low sensitivity of the QuickVue test also reported by others. Viral load, technique, and the use of nasal swabs were examined as contributing factors but were not found to be explanations for this result. Community testing includes patients who are on the lower spectrum of illness which would not be the case in hospital or clinic samples. This suggests that RFT is less sensitive for patients at the lower spectrum of illness, with less severe disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4942005
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49420052016-07-20 Sensitivity and specificity of rapid influenza testing of children in a community setting Stebbins, Samuel Stark, James H. Prasad, Ramakrishna Thompson, William W. Mitruka, Kiren Rinaldo, Charles Vukotich, Charles J. Cummings, Derek A. T. Influenza Other Respir Viruses Original Articles Please cite this paper as: Stebbins et al. (2011) Sensitivity and specificity of rapid influenza testing of children in a community setting. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 5(2), 104–109. Introduction  Rapid influenza testing (RFT) allows for a rapid point‐of‐care diagnosis of influenza. The Quidel QuickVue(®) Influenza A+B test (QuickVue) has a reported manufacturer’s sensitivity and specificity of 73% and 96%, respectively, with nasal swabs. However, investigators have shown sensitivities ranging from 22% to 77% in community settings. Methods  The QuickVue rapid influenza test was evaluated in a population of elementary (K‐5) school children, using testing in the home, as part of the Pittsburgh Influenza Prevention Project during the 2007–2008 influenza season. The QuickVue test was performed with nasal swab in full accordance with package instructions and compared with the results of nasal swab semi‐quantitative RT‐PCR. Results  Sensitivity of the QuickVue was found to be 27% in this sample. There was no statistically valid correlation between the semi‐quantitative PCR result and the QuickVue result. Conclusions  This study is consistent with the low sensitivity of the QuickVue test also reported by others. Viral load, technique, and the use of nasal swabs were examined as contributing factors but were not found to be explanations for this result. Community testing includes patients who are on the lower spectrum of illness which would not be the case in hospital or clinic samples. This suggests that RFT is less sensitive for patients at the lower spectrum of illness, with less severe disease. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2010-10-01 2011-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4942005/ /pubmed/21306573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2010.00171.x Text en © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
spellingShingle Original Articles
Stebbins, Samuel
Stark, James H.
Prasad, Ramakrishna
Thompson, William W.
Mitruka, Kiren
Rinaldo, Charles
Vukotich, Charles J.
Cummings, Derek A. T.
Sensitivity and specificity of rapid influenza testing of children in a community setting
title Sensitivity and specificity of rapid influenza testing of children in a community setting
title_full Sensitivity and specificity of rapid influenza testing of children in a community setting
title_fullStr Sensitivity and specificity of rapid influenza testing of children in a community setting
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity and specificity of rapid influenza testing of children in a community setting
title_short Sensitivity and specificity of rapid influenza testing of children in a community setting
title_sort sensitivity and specificity of rapid influenza testing of children in a community setting
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4942005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21306573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2010.00171.x
work_keys_str_mv AT stebbinssamuel sensitivityandspecificityofrapidinfluenzatestingofchildreninacommunitysetting
AT starkjamesh sensitivityandspecificityofrapidinfluenzatestingofchildreninacommunitysetting
AT prasadramakrishna sensitivityandspecificityofrapidinfluenzatestingofchildreninacommunitysetting
AT thompsonwilliamw sensitivityandspecificityofrapidinfluenzatestingofchildreninacommunitysetting
AT mitrukakiren sensitivityandspecificityofrapidinfluenzatestingofchildreninacommunitysetting
AT rinaldocharles sensitivityandspecificityofrapidinfluenzatestingofchildreninacommunitysetting
AT vukotichcharlesj sensitivityandspecificityofrapidinfluenzatestingofchildreninacommunitysetting
AT cummingsderekat sensitivityandspecificityofrapidinfluenzatestingofchildreninacommunitysetting