Cargando…

Rigid Bronchoscopy in Airway Foreign Bodies: Value of the Clinical and Radiological Signs

INTRODUCTION:  Foreign body in airway is a common emergency in ENT practice. As we know, Rigid Bronchoscopy is the method of choice for removing it, although at times it leads to specialists performing unnecessary bronchoscopy, exposing patients to hazards of general anesthesia. OBJECTIVE:  The obje...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Acharya, Kunjan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Publicações Ltda 2016
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4942294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27413398
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1584293
_version_ 1782442394928545792
author Acharya, Kunjan
author_facet Acharya, Kunjan
author_sort Acharya, Kunjan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION:  Foreign body in airway is a common emergency in ENT practice. As we know, Rigid Bronchoscopy is the method of choice for removing it, although at times it leads to specialists performing unnecessary bronchoscopy, exposing patients to hazards of general anesthesia. OBJECTIVE:  The objective of my study is to calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, odds ratio from the clinical and radiological signs, comparing with the gold standard, the rigid bronchoscope procedure. METHOD:  This is a prospective analytical study designed at University Teaching Hospital and conducted over a period of 18 months, from March 2011 to August 2012. Data collection was broadly classified into three different categories: (1) Symptomatology, such as presence or absence of choking, cyanosis, and difficulty in breathing; (2) Clinical signs, such as the presence or absence of air entry, crackles, and rhonchi 3. Chest X-ray findings were suggestive of a foreign body. RESULTS:  There were a total of 40 rigid bronchoscopies performed under general anesthesia for the diagnosis and therapeutic reasons. Among 40 patients who underwent rigid bronchoscopy, 32 (80%) were found to have varieties of foreign bodies in their airway while 8 patients (20%) had negative bronchoscopy. The history of choking is the only clinical symptoms which came out to be statistically Significant (p = 0.043) with odds ratio of 5. CONCLUSION:  Rigid bronchoscopy is the gold standard technique for diagnosis and procedure of choice to remove FB from airway. Regardless, it still presents a small chance of negative result, especially when there is no history of aspiration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4942294
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Thieme Publicações Ltda
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49422942016-07-13 Rigid Bronchoscopy in Airway Foreign Bodies: Value of the Clinical and Radiological Signs Acharya, Kunjan Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol INTRODUCTION:  Foreign body in airway is a common emergency in ENT practice. As we know, Rigid Bronchoscopy is the method of choice for removing it, although at times it leads to specialists performing unnecessary bronchoscopy, exposing patients to hazards of general anesthesia. OBJECTIVE:  The objective of my study is to calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, odds ratio from the clinical and radiological signs, comparing with the gold standard, the rigid bronchoscope procedure. METHOD:  This is a prospective analytical study designed at University Teaching Hospital and conducted over a period of 18 months, from March 2011 to August 2012. Data collection was broadly classified into three different categories: (1) Symptomatology, such as presence or absence of choking, cyanosis, and difficulty in breathing; (2) Clinical signs, such as the presence or absence of air entry, crackles, and rhonchi 3. Chest X-ray findings were suggestive of a foreign body. RESULTS:  There were a total of 40 rigid bronchoscopies performed under general anesthesia for the diagnosis and therapeutic reasons. Among 40 patients who underwent rigid bronchoscopy, 32 (80%) were found to have varieties of foreign bodies in their airway while 8 patients (20%) had negative bronchoscopy. The history of choking is the only clinical symptoms which came out to be statistically Significant (p = 0.043) with odds ratio of 5. CONCLUSION:  Rigid bronchoscopy is the gold standard technique for diagnosis and procedure of choice to remove FB from airway. Regardless, it still presents a small chance of negative result, especially when there is no history of aspiration. Thieme Publicações Ltda 2016-05-30 2016-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4942294/ /pubmed/27413398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1584293 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Acharya, Kunjan
Rigid Bronchoscopy in Airway Foreign Bodies: Value of the Clinical and Radiological Signs
title Rigid Bronchoscopy in Airway Foreign Bodies: Value of the Clinical and Radiological Signs
title_full Rigid Bronchoscopy in Airway Foreign Bodies: Value of the Clinical and Radiological Signs
title_fullStr Rigid Bronchoscopy in Airway Foreign Bodies: Value of the Clinical and Radiological Signs
title_full_unstemmed Rigid Bronchoscopy in Airway Foreign Bodies: Value of the Clinical and Radiological Signs
title_short Rigid Bronchoscopy in Airway Foreign Bodies: Value of the Clinical and Radiological Signs
title_sort rigid bronchoscopy in airway foreign bodies: value of the clinical and radiological signs
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4942294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27413398
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1584293
work_keys_str_mv AT acharyakunjan rigidbronchoscopyinairwayforeignbodiesvalueoftheclinicalandradiologicalsigns