Cargando…

Usefulness of Anorectal Manometry for Diagnosing Continence Problems After a Low Anterior Resection

PURPOSE: For several decades, the low anterior resection (LAR) with total mesorectal excision (TME) has been the gold standard for treating patients with rectal cancer. Up to 90% of patients undergoing sphincter-preserving surgery will have changes in bowel habits, so-called 'anterior resection...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dulskas, Audrius, Samalavicius, Narimantas E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Coloproctology 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4942524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27437391
http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2016.32.3.101
_version_ 1782442425104465920
author Dulskas, Audrius
Samalavicius, Narimantas E.
author_facet Dulskas, Audrius
Samalavicius, Narimantas E.
author_sort Dulskas, Audrius
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: For several decades, the low anterior resection (LAR) with total mesorectal excision (TME) has been the gold standard for treating patients with rectal cancer. Up to 90% of patients undergoing sphincter-preserving surgery will have changes in bowel habits, so-called 'anterior resection syndrome.' This study examined patients' continence after a LAR for the treatment of rectal cancer. METHODS: This prospective study was performed between September 2014 and August 2015 at the National Cancer Institute and included 30 patients who underwent anorectal manometry preoperatively and at 3 and 4 months after a LAR, but 10 were excluded from further evaluation for various reasons. Wexner score was recorded preoperatively and 4 months after LAR (1 month after ileostomy repair). RESULTS: Postoperatively, 70% of patients complained of some degree of soiling (incontinence to liquid stool), and 30% experienced urgent defecation. Four months after surgery, these symptoms had somewhat abated. The anal resting pressure and the maximum squeezing pressure did not change significantly. Rectal capacity and compliance were reduced in all patients. The majority of patients demonstrated manometric anorectal changes and clinical anorectal function disorders during the first 4 months after surgery. The Wexner scores and the manometric findings showed no correlation. CONCLUSION: Many patients undergoing a LAR with TME for the treatment of rectal cancer experience some degree of incontinence postoperatively. Anorectal manometry may be used as an additional tool for evaluating problems with continence after a LAR. No correlation between the Wexner score and the manometric findings was observed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4942524
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Korean Society of Coloproctology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49425242016-07-19 Usefulness of Anorectal Manometry for Diagnosing Continence Problems After a Low Anterior Resection Dulskas, Audrius Samalavicius, Narimantas E. Ann Coloproctol Original Article PURPOSE: For several decades, the low anterior resection (LAR) with total mesorectal excision (TME) has been the gold standard for treating patients with rectal cancer. Up to 90% of patients undergoing sphincter-preserving surgery will have changes in bowel habits, so-called 'anterior resection syndrome.' This study examined patients' continence after a LAR for the treatment of rectal cancer. METHODS: This prospective study was performed between September 2014 and August 2015 at the National Cancer Institute and included 30 patients who underwent anorectal manometry preoperatively and at 3 and 4 months after a LAR, but 10 were excluded from further evaluation for various reasons. Wexner score was recorded preoperatively and 4 months after LAR (1 month after ileostomy repair). RESULTS: Postoperatively, 70% of patients complained of some degree of soiling (incontinence to liquid stool), and 30% experienced urgent defecation. Four months after surgery, these symptoms had somewhat abated. The anal resting pressure and the maximum squeezing pressure did not change significantly. Rectal capacity and compliance were reduced in all patients. The majority of patients demonstrated manometric anorectal changes and clinical anorectal function disorders during the first 4 months after surgery. The Wexner scores and the manometric findings showed no correlation. CONCLUSION: Many patients undergoing a LAR with TME for the treatment of rectal cancer experience some degree of incontinence postoperatively. Anorectal manometry may be used as an additional tool for evaluating problems with continence after a LAR. No correlation between the Wexner score and the manometric findings was observed. The Korean Society of Coloproctology 2016-06 2016-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4942524/ /pubmed/27437391 http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2016.32.3.101 Text en © 2016 The Korean Society of Coloproctology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Dulskas, Audrius
Samalavicius, Narimantas E.
Usefulness of Anorectal Manometry for Diagnosing Continence Problems After a Low Anterior Resection
title Usefulness of Anorectal Manometry for Diagnosing Continence Problems After a Low Anterior Resection
title_full Usefulness of Anorectal Manometry for Diagnosing Continence Problems After a Low Anterior Resection
title_fullStr Usefulness of Anorectal Manometry for Diagnosing Continence Problems After a Low Anterior Resection
title_full_unstemmed Usefulness of Anorectal Manometry for Diagnosing Continence Problems After a Low Anterior Resection
title_short Usefulness of Anorectal Manometry for Diagnosing Continence Problems After a Low Anterior Resection
title_sort usefulness of anorectal manometry for diagnosing continence problems after a low anterior resection
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4942524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27437391
http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2016.32.3.101
work_keys_str_mv AT dulskasaudrius usefulnessofanorectalmanometryfordiagnosingcontinenceproblemsafteralowanteriorresection
AT samalaviciusnarimantase usefulnessofanorectalmanometryfordiagnosingcontinenceproblemsafteralowanteriorresection