Cargando…

Temporal Integration Windows in Neural Processing and Perception Aligned to Saccadic Eye Movements

When processing dynamic input, the brain balances the opposing needs of temporal integration and sensitivity to change. We hypothesized that the visual system might resolve this challenge by aligning integration windows to the onset of newly arriving sensory samples. In a series of experiments, huma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wutz, Andreas, Muschter, Evelyn, van Koningsbruggen, Martijn G., Weisz, Nathan, Melcher, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cell Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4942674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27291050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.04.070
_version_ 1782442458803601408
author Wutz, Andreas
Muschter, Evelyn
van Koningsbruggen, Martijn G.
Weisz, Nathan
Melcher, David
author_facet Wutz, Andreas
Muschter, Evelyn
van Koningsbruggen, Martijn G.
Weisz, Nathan
Melcher, David
author_sort Wutz, Andreas
collection PubMed
description When processing dynamic input, the brain balances the opposing needs of temporal integration and sensitivity to change. We hypothesized that the visual system might resolve this challenge by aligning integration windows to the onset of newly arriving sensory samples. In a series of experiments, human participants observed the same sequence of two displays separated by a brief blank delay when performing either an integration or segregation task. First, using magneto-encephalography (MEG), we found a shift in the stimulus-evoked time courses by a 150-ms time window between task signals. After stimulus onset, multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) decoding of task in occipital-parietal sources remained above chance for almost 1 s, and the task-decoding pattern interacted with task outcome. In the pre-stimulus period, the oscillatory phase in the theta frequency band was informative about both task processing and behavioral outcome for each task separately, suggesting that the post-stimulus effects were caused by a theta-band phase shift. Second, when aligning stimulus presentation to the onset of eye fixations, there was a similar phase shift in behavioral performance according to task demands. In both MEG and behavioral measures, task processing was optimal first for segregation and then integration, with opposite phase in the theta frequency range (3–5 Hz). The best fit to neurophysiological and behavioral data was given by a dampened 3-Hz oscillation from stimulus or eye fixation onset. The alignment of temporal integration windows to input changes found here may serve to actively organize the temporal processing of continuous sensory input.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4942674
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Cell Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49426742016-07-18 Temporal Integration Windows in Neural Processing and Perception Aligned to Saccadic Eye Movements Wutz, Andreas Muschter, Evelyn van Koningsbruggen, Martijn G. Weisz, Nathan Melcher, David Curr Biol Article When processing dynamic input, the brain balances the opposing needs of temporal integration and sensitivity to change. We hypothesized that the visual system might resolve this challenge by aligning integration windows to the onset of newly arriving sensory samples. In a series of experiments, human participants observed the same sequence of two displays separated by a brief blank delay when performing either an integration or segregation task. First, using magneto-encephalography (MEG), we found a shift in the stimulus-evoked time courses by a 150-ms time window between task signals. After stimulus onset, multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) decoding of task in occipital-parietal sources remained above chance for almost 1 s, and the task-decoding pattern interacted with task outcome. In the pre-stimulus period, the oscillatory phase in the theta frequency band was informative about both task processing and behavioral outcome for each task separately, suggesting that the post-stimulus effects were caused by a theta-band phase shift. Second, when aligning stimulus presentation to the onset of eye fixations, there was a similar phase shift in behavioral performance according to task demands. In both MEG and behavioral measures, task processing was optimal first for segregation and then integration, with opposite phase in the theta frequency range (3–5 Hz). The best fit to neurophysiological and behavioral data was given by a dampened 3-Hz oscillation from stimulus or eye fixation onset. The alignment of temporal integration windows to input changes found here may serve to actively organize the temporal processing of continuous sensory input. Cell Press 2016-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4942674/ /pubmed/27291050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.04.070 Text en © 2016 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wutz, Andreas
Muschter, Evelyn
van Koningsbruggen, Martijn G.
Weisz, Nathan
Melcher, David
Temporal Integration Windows in Neural Processing and Perception Aligned to Saccadic Eye Movements
title Temporal Integration Windows in Neural Processing and Perception Aligned to Saccadic Eye Movements
title_full Temporal Integration Windows in Neural Processing and Perception Aligned to Saccadic Eye Movements
title_fullStr Temporal Integration Windows in Neural Processing and Perception Aligned to Saccadic Eye Movements
title_full_unstemmed Temporal Integration Windows in Neural Processing and Perception Aligned to Saccadic Eye Movements
title_short Temporal Integration Windows in Neural Processing and Perception Aligned to Saccadic Eye Movements
title_sort temporal integration windows in neural processing and perception aligned to saccadic eye movements
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4942674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27291050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.04.070
work_keys_str_mv AT wutzandreas temporalintegrationwindowsinneuralprocessingandperceptionalignedtosaccadiceyemovements
AT muschterevelyn temporalintegrationwindowsinneuralprocessingandperceptionalignedtosaccadiceyemovements
AT vankoningsbruggenmartijng temporalintegrationwindowsinneuralprocessingandperceptionalignedtosaccadiceyemovements
AT weisznathan temporalintegrationwindowsinneuralprocessingandperceptionalignedtosaccadiceyemovements
AT melcherdavid temporalintegrationwindowsinneuralprocessingandperceptionalignedtosaccadiceyemovements