Cargando…

Bone grafting with granular biomaterial in segmental maxillary osteotomy: A case report

INTRODUCTION: Segmental maxillary osteotomy enables correction of anterior open bites. However, the outcome can be somewhat unstable, particularly if pseudarthrosis occurs. Bone grafts can be used to prevent this complication. Among the many biomaterials available for grafting, Bio-oss(®) has been u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haas Junior, Orion Luiz, da Silva Meirelles, Lucas, Scolari, Neimar, Emmel Becker, Otávio, Fernandes Santos Melo, Marcelo, Belle de Oliveira, Rogério
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4942733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27414994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.06.034
_version_ 1782442472308211712
author Haas Junior, Orion Luiz
da Silva Meirelles, Lucas
Scolari, Neimar
Emmel Becker, Otávio
Fernandes Santos Melo, Marcelo
Belle de Oliveira, Rogério
author_facet Haas Junior, Orion Luiz
da Silva Meirelles, Lucas
Scolari, Neimar
Emmel Becker, Otávio
Fernandes Santos Melo, Marcelo
Belle de Oliveira, Rogério
author_sort Haas Junior, Orion Luiz
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Segmental maxillary osteotomy enables correction of anterior open bites. However, the outcome can be somewhat unstable, particularly if pseudarthrosis occurs. Bone grafts can be used to prevent this complication. Among the many biomaterials available for grafting, Bio-oss(®) has been used successfully in a range of modalities, with studies to support several indications. This report describes a case of segmental maxillary osteotomy in which Bio-oss(®) granules were used as bone grafts in the surgical gap. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 24-year-old female presented with anterior open bite, Angle class III posterior occlusion, and Angle class II anterior occlusion. Virtual surgical planning of the procedure predicted a gap of approximately 5 mm in the region of the osteotomy, which was bridged with Bio-oss(®) granules. DISCUSSION: Although autogenous bone grafting is the gold standard due to its osteoconductive, osteoinductive, and osteogenic properties, it involves increased morbidity for the patient, unpredictable resorption rates, increased operative time, and risk of infection at the donor site. Use of the Bio-oss(®) material can provide good bone stability, osteoconduction, and biocompatibility, while reducing operative time and surgical morbidity. CONCLUSION: This is the first report of bone grafting with a granular biomaterial in segmental maxillary osteotomy. Successful formation of new bone with density greater than that of the surrounding tissue was achieved, preventing pseudarthrosis and postoperative instability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4942733
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49427332016-07-22 Bone grafting with granular biomaterial in segmental maxillary osteotomy: A case report Haas Junior, Orion Luiz da Silva Meirelles, Lucas Scolari, Neimar Emmel Becker, Otávio Fernandes Santos Melo, Marcelo Belle de Oliveira, Rogério Int J Surg Case Rep Case Report INTRODUCTION: Segmental maxillary osteotomy enables correction of anterior open bites. However, the outcome can be somewhat unstable, particularly if pseudarthrosis occurs. Bone grafts can be used to prevent this complication. Among the many biomaterials available for grafting, Bio-oss(®) has been used successfully in a range of modalities, with studies to support several indications. This report describes a case of segmental maxillary osteotomy in which Bio-oss(®) granules were used as bone grafts in the surgical gap. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 24-year-old female presented with anterior open bite, Angle class III posterior occlusion, and Angle class II anterior occlusion. Virtual surgical planning of the procedure predicted a gap of approximately 5 mm in the region of the osteotomy, which was bridged with Bio-oss(®) granules. DISCUSSION: Although autogenous bone grafting is the gold standard due to its osteoconductive, osteoinductive, and osteogenic properties, it involves increased morbidity for the patient, unpredictable resorption rates, increased operative time, and risk of infection at the donor site. Use of the Bio-oss(®) material can provide good bone stability, osteoconduction, and biocompatibility, while reducing operative time and surgical morbidity. CONCLUSION: This is the first report of bone grafting with a granular biomaterial in segmental maxillary osteotomy. Successful formation of new bone with density greater than that of the surrounding tissue was achieved, preventing pseudarthrosis and postoperative instability. Elsevier 2016-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4942733/ /pubmed/27414994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.06.034 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Report
Haas Junior, Orion Luiz
da Silva Meirelles, Lucas
Scolari, Neimar
Emmel Becker, Otávio
Fernandes Santos Melo, Marcelo
Belle de Oliveira, Rogério
Bone grafting with granular biomaterial in segmental maxillary osteotomy: A case report
title Bone grafting with granular biomaterial in segmental maxillary osteotomy: A case report
title_full Bone grafting with granular biomaterial in segmental maxillary osteotomy: A case report
title_fullStr Bone grafting with granular biomaterial in segmental maxillary osteotomy: A case report
title_full_unstemmed Bone grafting with granular biomaterial in segmental maxillary osteotomy: A case report
title_short Bone grafting with granular biomaterial in segmental maxillary osteotomy: A case report
title_sort bone grafting with granular biomaterial in segmental maxillary osteotomy: a case report
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4942733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27414994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.06.034
work_keys_str_mv AT haasjuniororionluiz bonegraftingwithgranularbiomaterialinsegmentalmaxillaryosteotomyacasereport
AT dasilvameirelleslucas bonegraftingwithgranularbiomaterialinsegmentalmaxillaryosteotomyacasereport
AT scolarineimar bonegraftingwithgranularbiomaterialinsegmentalmaxillaryosteotomyacasereport
AT emmelbeckerotavio bonegraftingwithgranularbiomaterialinsegmentalmaxillaryosteotomyacasereport
AT fernandessantosmelomarcelo bonegraftingwithgranularbiomaterialinsegmentalmaxillaryosteotomyacasereport
AT belledeoliveirarogerio bonegraftingwithgranularbiomaterialinsegmentalmaxillaryosteotomyacasereport