Cargando…
The Development and Validation of a Generic Instrument, QoDoS, for Assessing the Quality of Decision Making
Introduction: The impact of decision-making during the development and the regulatory review of medicines greatly influences the delivery of new medicinal products. Currently, there is no generic instrument that can be used to assess the quality of decision-making. This study describes the developme...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4942854/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27468267 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2016.00180 |
_version_ | 1782442492215427072 |
---|---|
author | Donelan, Ronan Walker, Stuart Salek, Sam |
author_facet | Donelan, Ronan Walker, Stuart Salek, Sam |
author_sort | Donelan, Ronan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: The impact of decision-making during the development and the regulatory review of medicines greatly influences the delivery of new medicinal products. Currently, there is no generic instrument that can be used to assess the quality of decision-making. This study describes the development of the Quality of Decision-Making Orientation Scheme QoDoS(©) instrument for appraising the quality of decision-making. Methods: Semi-structured interviews about decision-making were carried out with 29 senior decision makers from the pharmaceutical industry (10), regulatory authorities (9) and contract research organizations (10). The interviews offered a qualified understanding of the subjective decision-making approach, influences, behaviors and other factors that impact such processes for individuals and organizations involved in the delivery of new medicines. Thematic analysis of the transcribed interviews was carried out using NVivo8® software. Content validity was carried out using qualitative and quantitative data by an expert panel, which led to the developmental version of the QoDoS. Further psychometric evaluations were performed, including factor analysis, item reduction, reliability testing and construct validation. Results: The thematic analysis of the interviews yielded a 94-item initial version of the QoDoS(©) with a 5-point Likert scale. The instrument was tested for content validity using a panel of experts for language clarity, completeness, relevance and scaling, resulting in a favorable agreement by panel members with an intra-class correlation coefficient value of 0.89 (95% confidence interval = 0.56, 0.99). A 76-item QoDoS(©) (version 2) emerged from content validation. Factor analysis produced a 47-item measure with four domains. The 47-item QoDoS(©) (version 3) showed high internal consistency (n = 120, Cronbach's alpha = 0.89), high reproducibility (n = 20, intra-class correlation = 0.77) and a mean completion time of 10 min. Reliability testing and construct validation was successfully performed. Conclusion: The QoDoS(©) is both reliable and valid for use. It has the potential for extensive use in medicines development by both the pharmaceutical industry and regulatory authorities. The QoDoS(©) can be used to assess the quality of decision-making and to inform decision makers of the factors that influence decision-making. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4942854 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49428542016-07-27 The Development and Validation of a Generic Instrument, QoDoS, for Assessing the Quality of Decision Making Donelan, Ronan Walker, Stuart Salek, Sam Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Introduction: The impact of decision-making during the development and the regulatory review of medicines greatly influences the delivery of new medicinal products. Currently, there is no generic instrument that can be used to assess the quality of decision-making. This study describes the development of the Quality of Decision-Making Orientation Scheme QoDoS(©) instrument for appraising the quality of decision-making. Methods: Semi-structured interviews about decision-making were carried out with 29 senior decision makers from the pharmaceutical industry (10), regulatory authorities (9) and contract research organizations (10). The interviews offered a qualified understanding of the subjective decision-making approach, influences, behaviors and other factors that impact such processes for individuals and organizations involved in the delivery of new medicines. Thematic analysis of the transcribed interviews was carried out using NVivo8® software. Content validity was carried out using qualitative and quantitative data by an expert panel, which led to the developmental version of the QoDoS. Further psychometric evaluations were performed, including factor analysis, item reduction, reliability testing and construct validation. Results: The thematic analysis of the interviews yielded a 94-item initial version of the QoDoS(©) with a 5-point Likert scale. The instrument was tested for content validity using a panel of experts for language clarity, completeness, relevance and scaling, resulting in a favorable agreement by panel members with an intra-class correlation coefficient value of 0.89 (95% confidence interval = 0.56, 0.99). A 76-item QoDoS(©) (version 2) emerged from content validation. Factor analysis produced a 47-item measure with four domains. The 47-item QoDoS(©) (version 3) showed high internal consistency (n = 120, Cronbach's alpha = 0.89), high reproducibility (n = 20, intra-class correlation = 0.77) and a mean completion time of 10 min. Reliability testing and construct validation was successfully performed. Conclusion: The QoDoS(©) is both reliable and valid for use. It has the potential for extensive use in medicines development by both the pharmaceutical industry and regulatory authorities. The QoDoS(©) can be used to assess the quality of decision-making and to inform decision makers of the factors that influence decision-making. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4942854/ /pubmed/27468267 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2016.00180 Text en Copyright © 2016 Donelan, Walker and Salek. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacology Donelan, Ronan Walker, Stuart Salek, Sam The Development and Validation of a Generic Instrument, QoDoS, for Assessing the Quality of Decision Making |
title | The Development and Validation of a Generic Instrument, QoDoS, for Assessing the Quality of Decision Making |
title_full | The Development and Validation of a Generic Instrument, QoDoS, for Assessing the Quality of Decision Making |
title_fullStr | The Development and Validation of a Generic Instrument, QoDoS, for Assessing the Quality of Decision Making |
title_full_unstemmed | The Development and Validation of a Generic Instrument, QoDoS, for Assessing the Quality of Decision Making |
title_short | The Development and Validation of a Generic Instrument, QoDoS, for Assessing the Quality of Decision Making |
title_sort | development and validation of a generic instrument, qodos, for assessing the quality of decision making |
topic | Pharmacology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4942854/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27468267 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2016.00180 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT donelanronan thedevelopmentandvalidationofagenericinstrumentqodosforassessingthequalityofdecisionmaking AT walkerstuart thedevelopmentandvalidationofagenericinstrumentqodosforassessingthequalityofdecisionmaking AT saleksam thedevelopmentandvalidationofagenericinstrumentqodosforassessingthequalityofdecisionmaking AT donelanronan developmentandvalidationofagenericinstrumentqodosforassessingthequalityofdecisionmaking AT walkerstuart developmentandvalidationofagenericinstrumentqodosforassessingthequalityofdecisionmaking AT saleksam developmentandvalidationofagenericinstrumentqodosforassessingthequalityofdecisionmaking |