Cargando…

The Development and Validation of a Generic Instrument, QoDoS, for Assessing the Quality of Decision Making

Introduction: The impact of decision-making during the development and the regulatory review of medicines greatly influences the delivery of new medicinal products. Currently, there is no generic instrument that can be used to assess the quality of decision-making. This study describes the developme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Donelan, Ronan, Walker, Stuart, Salek, Sam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4942854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27468267
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2016.00180
_version_ 1782442492215427072
author Donelan, Ronan
Walker, Stuart
Salek, Sam
author_facet Donelan, Ronan
Walker, Stuart
Salek, Sam
author_sort Donelan, Ronan
collection PubMed
description Introduction: The impact of decision-making during the development and the regulatory review of medicines greatly influences the delivery of new medicinal products. Currently, there is no generic instrument that can be used to assess the quality of decision-making. This study describes the development of the Quality of Decision-Making Orientation Scheme QoDoS(©) instrument for appraising the quality of decision-making. Methods: Semi-structured interviews about decision-making were carried out with 29 senior decision makers from the pharmaceutical industry (10), regulatory authorities (9) and contract research organizations (10). The interviews offered a qualified understanding of the subjective decision-making approach, influences, behaviors and other factors that impact such processes for individuals and organizations involved in the delivery of new medicines. Thematic analysis of the transcribed interviews was carried out using NVivo8® software. Content validity was carried out using qualitative and quantitative data by an expert panel, which led to the developmental version of the QoDoS. Further psychometric evaluations were performed, including factor analysis, item reduction, reliability testing and construct validation. Results: The thematic analysis of the interviews yielded a 94-item initial version of the QoDoS(©) with a 5-point Likert scale. The instrument was tested for content validity using a panel of experts for language clarity, completeness, relevance and scaling, resulting in a favorable agreement by panel members with an intra-class correlation coefficient value of 0.89 (95% confidence interval = 0.56, 0.99). A 76-item QoDoS(©) (version 2) emerged from content validation. Factor analysis produced a 47-item measure with four domains. The 47-item QoDoS(©) (version 3) showed high internal consistency (n = 120, Cronbach's alpha = 0.89), high reproducibility (n = 20, intra-class correlation = 0.77) and a mean completion time of 10 min. Reliability testing and construct validation was successfully performed. Conclusion: The QoDoS(©) is both reliable and valid for use. It has the potential for extensive use in medicines development by both the pharmaceutical industry and regulatory authorities. The QoDoS(©) can be used to assess the quality of decision-making and to inform decision makers of the factors that influence decision-making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4942854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49428542016-07-27 The Development and Validation of a Generic Instrument, QoDoS, for Assessing the Quality of Decision Making Donelan, Ronan Walker, Stuart Salek, Sam Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Introduction: The impact of decision-making during the development and the regulatory review of medicines greatly influences the delivery of new medicinal products. Currently, there is no generic instrument that can be used to assess the quality of decision-making. This study describes the development of the Quality of Decision-Making Orientation Scheme QoDoS(©) instrument for appraising the quality of decision-making. Methods: Semi-structured interviews about decision-making were carried out with 29 senior decision makers from the pharmaceutical industry (10), regulatory authorities (9) and contract research organizations (10). The interviews offered a qualified understanding of the subjective decision-making approach, influences, behaviors and other factors that impact such processes for individuals and organizations involved in the delivery of new medicines. Thematic analysis of the transcribed interviews was carried out using NVivo8® software. Content validity was carried out using qualitative and quantitative data by an expert panel, which led to the developmental version of the QoDoS. Further psychometric evaluations were performed, including factor analysis, item reduction, reliability testing and construct validation. Results: The thematic analysis of the interviews yielded a 94-item initial version of the QoDoS(©) with a 5-point Likert scale. The instrument was tested for content validity using a panel of experts for language clarity, completeness, relevance and scaling, resulting in a favorable agreement by panel members with an intra-class correlation coefficient value of 0.89 (95% confidence interval = 0.56, 0.99). A 76-item QoDoS(©) (version 2) emerged from content validation. Factor analysis produced a 47-item measure with four domains. The 47-item QoDoS(©) (version 3) showed high internal consistency (n = 120, Cronbach's alpha = 0.89), high reproducibility (n = 20, intra-class correlation = 0.77) and a mean completion time of 10 min. Reliability testing and construct validation was successfully performed. Conclusion: The QoDoS(©) is both reliable and valid for use. It has the potential for extensive use in medicines development by both the pharmaceutical industry and regulatory authorities. The QoDoS(©) can be used to assess the quality of decision-making and to inform decision makers of the factors that influence decision-making. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4942854/ /pubmed/27468267 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2016.00180 Text en Copyright © 2016 Donelan, Walker and Salek. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Donelan, Ronan
Walker, Stuart
Salek, Sam
The Development and Validation of a Generic Instrument, QoDoS, for Assessing the Quality of Decision Making
title The Development and Validation of a Generic Instrument, QoDoS, for Assessing the Quality of Decision Making
title_full The Development and Validation of a Generic Instrument, QoDoS, for Assessing the Quality of Decision Making
title_fullStr The Development and Validation of a Generic Instrument, QoDoS, for Assessing the Quality of Decision Making
title_full_unstemmed The Development and Validation of a Generic Instrument, QoDoS, for Assessing the Quality of Decision Making
title_short The Development and Validation of a Generic Instrument, QoDoS, for Assessing the Quality of Decision Making
title_sort development and validation of a generic instrument, qodos, for assessing the quality of decision making
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4942854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27468267
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2016.00180
work_keys_str_mv AT donelanronan thedevelopmentandvalidationofagenericinstrumentqodosforassessingthequalityofdecisionmaking
AT walkerstuart thedevelopmentandvalidationofagenericinstrumentqodosforassessingthequalityofdecisionmaking
AT saleksam thedevelopmentandvalidationofagenericinstrumentqodosforassessingthequalityofdecisionmaking
AT donelanronan developmentandvalidationofagenericinstrumentqodosforassessingthequalityofdecisionmaking
AT walkerstuart developmentandvalidationofagenericinstrumentqodosforassessingthequalityofdecisionmaking
AT saleksam developmentandvalidationofagenericinstrumentqodosforassessingthequalityofdecisionmaking