Cargando…
A value proposition for early physical therapist management of neck pain: a retrospective cohort analysis
BACKGROUND: Neck pain is one of the most common reasons for entry into the healthcare system. Recent increases in healthcare utilization and medical costs have not correlated with improvements in health. Therefore there is a need to identify management strategies for neck pain that are effective for...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4942887/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27405318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1504-5 |
_version_ | 1782442494729912320 |
---|---|
author | Horn, Maggie E. Brennan, Gerard P. George, Steven Z. Harman, Jeffrey S. Bishop, Mark D. |
author_facet | Horn, Maggie E. Brennan, Gerard P. George, Steven Z. Harman, Jeffrey S. Bishop, Mark D. |
author_sort | Horn, Maggie E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Neck pain is one of the most common reasons for entry into the healthcare system. Recent increases in healthcare utilization and medical costs have not correlated with improvements in health. Therefore there is a need to identify management strategies for neck pain that are effective for the patient, cost efficient for the payer and provided at the optimal time during an episode of neck pain. METHODS: One thousand five hundred thirty-one patients who underwent physical therapist management with a primary complaint of non-specific neck pain from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2012 were identified from the Rehabilitation Outcomes Management System (ROMS) database at Intermountain Healthcare. Patients reporting duration of symptoms less than 4 weeks were designated as undergoing “early” management and patients with duration of symptoms greater than 4 weeks were designated as receiving “delayed” management. These groups were compared using binary logistic regression to examine odds of achieving Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) on the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). Separate generalized linear modeling examined the effect of timing of physical therapist management on the metrics of value and efficiency. RESULTS: Patients who received early physical therapist management had increased odds of achieving MCID on the NDI (aOR = 2.01, 95 % CI 1.57, 2.56) and MCID on the NPRS (aOR = 1.82, 95 % CI 1.42, 2.38), when compared to patients receiving delayed management. Patients who received early management demonstrated the greatest value in decreasing disability with a 2.27 percentage point change in NDI score per 100 dollars, best value in decreasing pain with a 0.38 point change on the NPRS per 100 dollars. Finally, patients receiving early management were managed more efficiently with a 3.44 percentage point change in NDI score per visit and 0.57 point change in NPRS score per visit. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that healthcare systems that provide pathways for patients to receive early physical therapist management of neck pain may realize improved patient outcomes, greater value and higher efficiency in decreasing disability and pain compared to delayed management. Further research is needed to confirm this assertion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4942887 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49428872016-07-14 A value proposition for early physical therapist management of neck pain: a retrospective cohort analysis Horn, Maggie E. Brennan, Gerard P. George, Steven Z. Harman, Jeffrey S. Bishop, Mark D. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Neck pain is one of the most common reasons for entry into the healthcare system. Recent increases in healthcare utilization and medical costs have not correlated with improvements in health. Therefore there is a need to identify management strategies for neck pain that are effective for the patient, cost efficient for the payer and provided at the optimal time during an episode of neck pain. METHODS: One thousand five hundred thirty-one patients who underwent physical therapist management with a primary complaint of non-specific neck pain from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2012 were identified from the Rehabilitation Outcomes Management System (ROMS) database at Intermountain Healthcare. Patients reporting duration of symptoms less than 4 weeks were designated as undergoing “early” management and patients with duration of symptoms greater than 4 weeks were designated as receiving “delayed” management. These groups were compared using binary logistic regression to examine odds of achieving Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) on the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). Separate generalized linear modeling examined the effect of timing of physical therapist management on the metrics of value and efficiency. RESULTS: Patients who received early physical therapist management had increased odds of achieving MCID on the NDI (aOR = 2.01, 95 % CI 1.57, 2.56) and MCID on the NPRS (aOR = 1.82, 95 % CI 1.42, 2.38), when compared to patients receiving delayed management. Patients who received early management demonstrated the greatest value in decreasing disability with a 2.27 percentage point change in NDI score per 100 dollars, best value in decreasing pain with a 0.38 point change on the NPRS per 100 dollars. Finally, patients receiving early management were managed more efficiently with a 3.44 percentage point change in NDI score per visit and 0.57 point change in NPRS score per visit. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that healthcare systems that provide pathways for patients to receive early physical therapist management of neck pain may realize improved patient outcomes, greater value and higher efficiency in decreasing disability and pain compared to delayed management. Further research is needed to confirm this assertion. BioMed Central 2016-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4942887/ /pubmed/27405318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1504-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Horn, Maggie E. Brennan, Gerard P. George, Steven Z. Harman, Jeffrey S. Bishop, Mark D. A value proposition for early physical therapist management of neck pain: a retrospective cohort analysis |
title | A value proposition for early physical therapist management of neck pain: a retrospective cohort analysis |
title_full | A value proposition for early physical therapist management of neck pain: a retrospective cohort analysis |
title_fullStr | A value proposition for early physical therapist management of neck pain: a retrospective cohort analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | A value proposition for early physical therapist management of neck pain: a retrospective cohort analysis |
title_short | A value proposition for early physical therapist management of neck pain: a retrospective cohort analysis |
title_sort | value proposition for early physical therapist management of neck pain: a retrospective cohort analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4942887/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27405318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1504-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hornmaggiee avaluepropositionforearlyphysicaltherapistmanagementofneckpainaretrospectivecohortanalysis AT brennangerardp avaluepropositionforearlyphysicaltherapistmanagementofneckpainaretrospectivecohortanalysis AT georgestevenz avaluepropositionforearlyphysicaltherapistmanagementofneckpainaretrospectivecohortanalysis AT harmanjeffreys avaluepropositionforearlyphysicaltherapistmanagementofneckpainaretrospectivecohortanalysis AT bishopmarkd avaluepropositionforearlyphysicaltherapistmanagementofneckpainaretrospectivecohortanalysis AT hornmaggiee valuepropositionforearlyphysicaltherapistmanagementofneckpainaretrospectivecohortanalysis AT brennangerardp valuepropositionforearlyphysicaltherapistmanagementofneckpainaretrospectivecohortanalysis AT georgestevenz valuepropositionforearlyphysicaltherapistmanagementofneckpainaretrospectivecohortanalysis AT harmanjeffreys valuepropositionforearlyphysicaltherapistmanagementofneckpainaretrospectivecohortanalysis AT bishopmarkd valuepropositionforearlyphysicaltherapistmanagementofneckpainaretrospectivecohortanalysis |