Cargando…
Cluster randomized trial assessing the effects of rapid ethical assessment on informed consent comprehension in a low-resource setting
BACKGROUND: Maximizing comprehension is a major challenge for informed consent processes in low-literacy and resource-limited settings. Application of rapid qualitative assessments to improve the informed consent process is increasingly considered useful. This study assessed the effects of Rapid Eth...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4943010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27406063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0127-z |
_version_ | 1782442518654222336 |
---|---|
author | Addissie, Adamu Abay, Serebe Feleke, Yeweyenhareg Newport, Melanie Farsides, Bobbie Davey, Gail |
author_facet | Addissie, Adamu Abay, Serebe Feleke, Yeweyenhareg Newport, Melanie Farsides, Bobbie Davey, Gail |
author_sort | Addissie, Adamu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Maximizing comprehension is a major challenge for informed consent processes in low-literacy and resource-limited settings. Application of rapid qualitative assessments to improve the informed consent process is increasingly considered useful. This study assessed the effects of Rapid Ethical Assessment (REA) on comprehension, retention and quality of the informed consent process. METHODS: A cluster randomized trial was conducted among participants of HPV sero-prevalence study in two districts of Northern Ethiopia, in 2013. A total of 300 study participants, 150 in the intervention and 150 in the control group, were included in the study. For the intervention group, the informed consent process was designed with further revisions based on REA findings. Informed consent comprehension levels and quality of the consent process were measured using the Modular Informed Consent Comprehension Assessment (MICCA) and Quality of Informed Consent (QuIC) process assessment tools, respectively. RESULT: Study recruitment rates were 88.7 % and 80.7 % (p = 0.05), while study retention rates were 85.7 % and 70.3 % (p < 0.005) for the intervention and control groups respectively. Overall, the mean informed consent comprehension scores for the intervention and control groups were 73.1 % and 45.2 %, respectively, with a mean difference in comprehension score of 27.9 % (95 % CI 24.0 % - 33.4 %; p < 0.001,). Mean scores for quality of informed consent for the intervention and control groups were 89.1 % and 78.5 %, respectively, with a mean difference of 10.5 % (95 % CI 6.8 -14.2 %; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Levels of informed consent comprehension, quality of the consent process, study recruitment and retention rates were significantly improved in the intervention group. We recommend REA as a potential modality to improve informed consent comprehension and quality of informed consent process in low resource settings. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12910-016-0127-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4943010 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49430102016-07-14 Cluster randomized trial assessing the effects of rapid ethical assessment on informed consent comprehension in a low-resource setting Addissie, Adamu Abay, Serebe Feleke, Yeweyenhareg Newport, Melanie Farsides, Bobbie Davey, Gail BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: Maximizing comprehension is a major challenge for informed consent processes in low-literacy and resource-limited settings. Application of rapid qualitative assessments to improve the informed consent process is increasingly considered useful. This study assessed the effects of Rapid Ethical Assessment (REA) on comprehension, retention and quality of the informed consent process. METHODS: A cluster randomized trial was conducted among participants of HPV sero-prevalence study in two districts of Northern Ethiopia, in 2013. A total of 300 study participants, 150 in the intervention and 150 in the control group, were included in the study. For the intervention group, the informed consent process was designed with further revisions based on REA findings. Informed consent comprehension levels and quality of the consent process were measured using the Modular Informed Consent Comprehension Assessment (MICCA) and Quality of Informed Consent (QuIC) process assessment tools, respectively. RESULT: Study recruitment rates were 88.7 % and 80.7 % (p = 0.05), while study retention rates were 85.7 % and 70.3 % (p < 0.005) for the intervention and control groups respectively. Overall, the mean informed consent comprehension scores for the intervention and control groups were 73.1 % and 45.2 %, respectively, with a mean difference in comprehension score of 27.9 % (95 % CI 24.0 % - 33.4 %; p < 0.001,). Mean scores for quality of informed consent for the intervention and control groups were 89.1 % and 78.5 %, respectively, with a mean difference of 10.5 % (95 % CI 6.8 -14.2 %; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Levels of informed consent comprehension, quality of the consent process, study recruitment and retention rates were significantly improved in the intervention group. We recommend REA as a potential modality to improve informed consent comprehension and quality of informed consent process in low resource settings. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12910-016-0127-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4943010/ /pubmed/27406063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0127-z Text en © Addissie et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Addissie, Adamu Abay, Serebe Feleke, Yeweyenhareg Newport, Melanie Farsides, Bobbie Davey, Gail Cluster randomized trial assessing the effects of rapid ethical assessment on informed consent comprehension in a low-resource setting |
title | Cluster randomized trial assessing the effects of rapid ethical assessment on informed consent comprehension in a low-resource setting |
title_full | Cluster randomized trial assessing the effects of rapid ethical assessment on informed consent comprehension in a low-resource setting |
title_fullStr | Cluster randomized trial assessing the effects of rapid ethical assessment on informed consent comprehension in a low-resource setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Cluster randomized trial assessing the effects of rapid ethical assessment on informed consent comprehension in a low-resource setting |
title_short | Cluster randomized trial assessing the effects of rapid ethical assessment on informed consent comprehension in a low-resource setting |
title_sort | cluster randomized trial assessing the effects of rapid ethical assessment on informed consent comprehension in a low-resource setting |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4943010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27406063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0127-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT addissieadamu clusterrandomizedtrialassessingtheeffectsofrapidethicalassessmentoninformedconsentcomprehensioninalowresourcesetting AT abayserebe clusterrandomizedtrialassessingtheeffectsofrapidethicalassessmentoninformedconsentcomprehensioninalowresourcesetting AT felekeyeweyenhareg clusterrandomizedtrialassessingtheeffectsofrapidethicalassessmentoninformedconsentcomprehensioninalowresourcesetting AT newportmelanie clusterrandomizedtrialassessingtheeffectsofrapidethicalassessmentoninformedconsentcomprehensioninalowresourcesetting AT farsidesbobbie clusterrandomizedtrialassessingtheeffectsofrapidethicalassessmentoninformedconsentcomprehensioninalowresourcesetting AT daveygail clusterrandomizedtrialassessingtheeffectsofrapidethicalassessmentoninformedconsentcomprehensioninalowresourcesetting |