Cargando…

Cluster randomized trial assessing the effects of rapid ethical assessment on informed consent comprehension in a low-resource setting

BACKGROUND: Maximizing comprehension is a major challenge for informed consent processes in low-literacy and resource-limited settings. Application of rapid qualitative assessments to improve the informed consent process is increasingly considered useful. This study assessed the effects of Rapid Eth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Addissie, Adamu, Abay, Serebe, Feleke, Yeweyenhareg, Newport, Melanie, Farsides, Bobbie, Davey, Gail
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4943010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27406063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0127-z
_version_ 1782442518654222336
author Addissie, Adamu
Abay, Serebe
Feleke, Yeweyenhareg
Newport, Melanie
Farsides, Bobbie
Davey, Gail
author_facet Addissie, Adamu
Abay, Serebe
Feleke, Yeweyenhareg
Newport, Melanie
Farsides, Bobbie
Davey, Gail
author_sort Addissie, Adamu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Maximizing comprehension is a major challenge for informed consent processes in low-literacy and resource-limited settings. Application of rapid qualitative assessments to improve the informed consent process is increasingly considered useful. This study assessed the effects of Rapid Ethical Assessment (REA) on comprehension, retention and quality of the informed consent process. METHODS: A cluster randomized trial was conducted among participants of HPV sero-prevalence study in two districts of Northern Ethiopia, in 2013. A total of 300 study participants, 150 in the intervention and 150 in the control group, were included in the study. For the intervention group, the informed consent process was designed with further revisions based on REA findings. Informed consent comprehension levels and quality of the consent process were measured using the Modular Informed Consent Comprehension Assessment (MICCA) and Quality of Informed Consent (QuIC) process assessment tools, respectively. RESULT: Study recruitment rates were 88.7 % and 80.7 % (p = 0.05), while study retention rates were 85.7 % and 70.3 % (p < 0.005) for the intervention and control groups respectively. Overall, the mean informed consent comprehension scores for the intervention and control groups were 73.1 % and 45.2 %, respectively, with a mean difference in comprehension score of 27.9 % (95 % CI 24.0 % - 33.4 %; p < 0.001,). Mean scores for quality of informed consent for the intervention and control groups were 89.1 % and 78.5 %, respectively, with a mean difference of 10.5 % (95 % CI 6.8 -14.2 %; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Levels of informed consent comprehension, quality of the consent process, study recruitment and retention rates were significantly improved in the intervention group. We recommend REA as a potential modality to improve informed consent comprehension and quality of informed consent process in low resource settings. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12910-016-0127-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4943010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49430102016-07-14 Cluster randomized trial assessing the effects of rapid ethical assessment on informed consent comprehension in a low-resource setting Addissie, Adamu Abay, Serebe Feleke, Yeweyenhareg Newport, Melanie Farsides, Bobbie Davey, Gail BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: Maximizing comprehension is a major challenge for informed consent processes in low-literacy and resource-limited settings. Application of rapid qualitative assessments to improve the informed consent process is increasingly considered useful. This study assessed the effects of Rapid Ethical Assessment (REA) on comprehension, retention and quality of the informed consent process. METHODS: A cluster randomized trial was conducted among participants of HPV sero-prevalence study in two districts of Northern Ethiopia, in 2013. A total of 300 study participants, 150 in the intervention and 150 in the control group, were included in the study. For the intervention group, the informed consent process was designed with further revisions based on REA findings. Informed consent comprehension levels and quality of the consent process were measured using the Modular Informed Consent Comprehension Assessment (MICCA) and Quality of Informed Consent (QuIC) process assessment tools, respectively. RESULT: Study recruitment rates were 88.7 % and 80.7 % (p = 0.05), while study retention rates were 85.7 % and 70.3 % (p < 0.005) for the intervention and control groups respectively. Overall, the mean informed consent comprehension scores for the intervention and control groups were 73.1 % and 45.2 %, respectively, with a mean difference in comprehension score of 27.9 % (95 % CI 24.0 % - 33.4 %; p < 0.001,). Mean scores for quality of informed consent for the intervention and control groups were 89.1 % and 78.5 %, respectively, with a mean difference of 10.5 % (95 % CI 6.8 -14.2 %; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Levels of informed consent comprehension, quality of the consent process, study recruitment and retention rates were significantly improved in the intervention group. We recommend REA as a potential modality to improve informed consent comprehension and quality of informed consent process in low resource settings. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12910-016-0127-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4943010/ /pubmed/27406063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0127-z Text en © Addissie et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Addissie, Adamu
Abay, Serebe
Feleke, Yeweyenhareg
Newport, Melanie
Farsides, Bobbie
Davey, Gail
Cluster randomized trial assessing the effects of rapid ethical assessment on informed consent comprehension in a low-resource setting
title Cluster randomized trial assessing the effects of rapid ethical assessment on informed consent comprehension in a low-resource setting
title_full Cluster randomized trial assessing the effects of rapid ethical assessment on informed consent comprehension in a low-resource setting
title_fullStr Cluster randomized trial assessing the effects of rapid ethical assessment on informed consent comprehension in a low-resource setting
title_full_unstemmed Cluster randomized trial assessing the effects of rapid ethical assessment on informed consent comprehension in a low-resource setting
title_short Cluster randomized trial assessing the effects of rapid ethical assessment on informed consent comprehension in a low-resource setting
title_sort cluster randomized trial assessing the effects of rapid ethical assessment on informed consent comprehension in a low-resource setting
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4943010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27406063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0127-z
work_keys_str_mv AT addissieadamu clusterrandomizedtrialassessingtheeffectsofrapidethicalassessmentoninformedconsentcomprehensioninalowresourcesetting
AT abayserebe clusterrandomizedtrialassessingtheeffectsofrapidethicalassessmentoninformedconsentcomprehensioninalowresourcesetting
AT felekeyeweyenhareg clusterrandomizedtrialassessingtheeffectsofrapidethicalassessmentoninformedconsentcomprehensioninalowresourcesetting
AT newportmelanie clusterrandomizedtrialassessingtheeffectsofrapidethicalassessmentoninformedconsentcomprehensioninalowresourcesetting
AT farsidesbobbie clusterrandomizedtrialassessingtheeffectsofrapidethicalassessmentoninformedconsentcomprehensioninalowresourcesetting
AT daveygail clusterrandomizedtrialassessingtheeffectsofrapidethicalassessmentoninformedconsentcomprehensioninalowresourcesetting