Cargando…

Validity and reliability of the developmental assessment screening scale

OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate the 6-year Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) for school-age children. METHODS: Parents/caregivers of children 66–78 months were recruited from 6 countries and 15 states in the United States. Similar to other ASQ intervals, the 6-year ASQ has five developmental d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Ajay, Squires, Jane, Yeh, Chia Jung, Heo, Kay H., Bian, Hui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4943118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27453856
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.184636
_version_ 1782442536631009280
author Singh, Ajay
Squires, Jane
Yeh, Chia Jung
Heo, Kay H.
Bian, Hui
author_facet Singh, Ajay
Squires, Jane
Yeh, Chia Jung
Heo, Kay H.
Bian, Hui
author_sort Singh, Ajay
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate the 6-year Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) for school-age children. METHODS: Parents/caregivers of children 66–78 months were recruited from 6 countries and 15 states in the United States. Similar to other ASQ intervals, the 6-year ASQ has five developmental domains targeted for children from 66 months to 78 months of age. We assessed internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, the scale structure, validity (correlation coefficients), and utility of the 6-year ASQ. The 6-year ASQ screens development in five domains using 30 items. RESULTS: Coefficient alpha measuring internal consistency was 0.97. Test-retest reliability was estimated by having parents complete two ASQ's on the same child within a week interval. Correlations between scores of the two ASQ's reflected stability of scores. Test-retest reliability results were robust with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.94. Factor analysis results resulted in a five factors structure. The Pearson correlations coefficients between the latent variables were moderate to large and statistically significant, P < 0.0001. The 6-year ASQ screens development in five domains using 30 items. The administration time varied from 10 to 60 min with a mean of 15.17 min. General utility result shows that the 6-year ASQ can be used with satisfaction by caregivers, pediatricians, professionals, and parents. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary data on the 6-year ASQ reflected promising results. An easy-to-administer, accurate caregiver-completed screening tool may increase the frequency of screening for school-age children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4943118
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49431182016-07-22 Validity and reliability of the developmental assessment screening scale Singh, Ajay Squires, Jane Yeh, Chia Jung Heo, Kay H. Bian, Hui J Family Med Prim Care Original Article OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate the 6-year Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) for school-age children. METHODS: Parents/caregivers of children 66–78 months were recruited from 6 countries and 15 states in the United States. Similar to other ASQ intervals, the 6-year ASQ has five developmental domains targeted for children from 66 months to 78 months of age. We assessed internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, the scale structure, validity (correlation coefficients), and utility of the 6-year ASQ. The 6-year ASQ screens development in five domains using 30 items. RESULTS: Coefficient alpha measuring internal consistency was 0.97. Test-retest reliability was estimated by having parents complete two ASQ's on the same child within a week interval. Correlations between scores of the two ASQ's reflected stability of scores. Test-retest reliability results were robust with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.94. Factor analysis results resulted in a five factors structure. The Pearson correlations coefficients between the latent variables were moderate to large and statistically significant, P < 0.0001. The 6-year ASQ screens development in five domains using 30 items. The administration time varied from 10 to 60 min with a mean of 15.17 min. General utility result shows that the 6-year ASQ can be used with satisfaction by caregivers, pediatricians, professionals, and parents. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary data on the 6-year ASQ reflected promising results. An easy-to-administer, accurate caregiver-completed screening tool may increase the frequency of screening for school-age children. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4943118/ /pubmed/27453856 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.184636 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Singh, Ajay
Squires, Jane
Yeh, Chia Jung
Heo, Kay H.
Bian, Hui
Validity and reliability of the developmental assessment screening scale
title Validity and reliability of the developmental assessment screening scale
title_full Validity and reliability of the developmental assessment screening scale
title_fullStr Validity and reliability of the developmental assessment screening scale
title_full_unstemmed Validity and reliability of the developmental assessment screening scale
title_short Validity and reliability of the developmental assessment screening scale
title_sort validity and reliability of the developmental assessment screening scale
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4943118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27453856
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.184636
work_keys_str_mv AT singhajay validityandreliabilityofthedevelopmentalassessmentscreeningscale
AT squiresjane validityandreliabilityofthedevelopmentalassessmentscreeningscale
AT yehchiajung validityandreliabilityofthedevelopmentalassessmentscreeningscale
AT heokayh validityandreliabilityofthedevelopmentalassessmentscreeningscale
AT bianhui validityandreliabilityofthedevelopmentalassessmentscreeningscale