Cargando…

Coronary CT Angiography Versus Standard Emergency Department Evaluation for Acute Chest Pain and Diabetic Patients: Is There Benefit With Early Coronary CT Angiography?: Results of the Randomized Comparative Effectiveness ROMICAT II Trial

BACKGROUND: Cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) reduces emergency department length of stay compared with standard evaluation in patients with low‐ and intermediate‐risk acute chest pain. Whether diabetic patients have similar benefits is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this prespecified...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Truong, Quynh A., Schulman‐Marcus, Joshua, Zakroysky, Pearl, Chou, Eric T., Nagurney, John T., Fleg, Jerome L., Schoenfeld, David A., Udelson, James E., Hoffmann, Udo, Woodard, Pamela K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4943281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27006119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.003137
_version_ 1782442566493405184
author Truong, Quynh A.
Schulman‐Marcus, Joshua
Zakroysky, Pearl
Chou, Eric T.
Nagurney, John T.
Fleg, Jerome L.
Schoenfeld, David A.
Udelson, James E.
Hoffmann, Udo
Woodard, Pamela K.
author_facet Truong, Quynh A.
Schulman‐Marcus, Joshua
Zakroysky, Pearl
Chou, Eric T.
Nagurney, John T.
Fleg, Jerome L.
Schoenfeld, David A.
Udelson, James E.
Hoffmann, Udo
Woodard, Pamela K.
author_sort Truong, Quynh A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) reduces emergency department length of stay compared with standard evaluation in patients with low‐ and intermediate‐risk acute chest pain. Whether diabetic patients have similar benefits is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this prespecified analysis of the Rule Out Myocardial Ischemia/Infarction by Computer Assisted Tomography (ROMICAT II) multicenter trial, we randomized 1000 patients (17% diabetic) with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome to CCTA or standard evaluation. The rate of acute coronary syndrome was 8% in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients (P=1.0). Length of stay was unaffected by the CCTA strategy for diabetic patients (23.9 versus 27.2 hours, P=0.86) but was reduced for nondiabetic patients compared with standard evaluation (8.4 versus 26.5 hours, P<0.0001; P interaction=0.004). CCTA resulted in 3‐fold more direct emergency department discharge in both groups (each P≤0.0001, P interaction=0.27). No difference in hospital admissions was seen between the 2 strategies in diabetic and nondiabetic patients (P interaction=0.09). Both groups had more downstream testing and higher radiation doses with CCTA, but these were highest in diabetic patients (all P interaction≤0.04). Diabetic patients had fewer normal CCTAs than nondiabetic patients (32% versus 50%, P=0.003) and similar normalcy rates with standard evaluation (P=0.70). Notably, 66% of diabetic patients had no or mild stenosis by CCTA with short length of stay comparable to that of nondiabetic patients (P=0.34), whereas those with >50% stenosis had a high prevalence of acute coronary syndrome, invasive coronary angiography, and revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of coronary anatomy with CCTA is beneficial for diabetic patients and can discriminate between lower risk patients with no or little coronary artery disease who can be discharged immediately and higher risk patients with moderate to severe disease who warrant further workup. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT01084239.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4943281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49432812016-07-20 Coronary CT Angiography Versus Standard Emergency Department Evaluation for Acute Chest Pain and Diabetic Patients: Is There Benefit With Early Coronary CT Angiography?: Results of the Randomized Comparative Effectiveness ROMICAT II Trial Truong, Quynh A. Schulman‐Marcus, Joshua Zakroysky, Pearl Chou, Eric T. Nagurney, John T. Fleg, Jerome L. Schoenfeld, David A. Udelson, James E. Hoffmann, Udo Woodard, Pamela K. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) reduces emergency department length of stay compared with standard evaluation in patients with low‐ and intermediate‐risk acute chest pain. Whether diabetic patients have similar benefits is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this prespecified analysis of the Rule Out Myocardial Ischemia/Infarction by Computer Assisted Tomography (ROMICAT II) multicenter trial, we randomized 1000 patients (17% diabetic) with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome to CCTA or standard evaluation. The rate of acute coronary syndrome was 8% in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients (P=1.0). Length of stay was unaffected by the CCTA strategy for diabetic patients (23.9 versus 27.2 hours, P=0.86) but was reduced for nondiabetic patients compared with standard evaluation (8.4 versus 26.5 hours, P<0.0001; P interaction=0.004). CCTA resulted in 3‐fold more direct emergency department discharge in both groups (each P≤0.0001, P interaction=0.27). No difference in hospital admissions was seen between the 2 strategies in diabetic and nondiabetic patients (P interaction=0.09). Both groups had more downstream testing and higher radiation doses with CCTA, but these were highest in diabetic patients (all P interaction≤0.04). Diabetic patients had fewer normal CCTAs than nondiabetic patients (32% versus 50%, P=0.003) and similar normalcy rates with standard evaluation (P=0.70). Notably, 66% of diabetic patients had no or mild stenosis by CCTA with short length of stay comparable to that of nondiabetic patients (P=0.34), whereas those with >50% stenosis had a high prevalence of acute coronary syndrome, invasive coronary angiography, and revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of coronary anatomy with CCTA is beneficial for diabetic patients and can discriminate between lower risk patients with no or little coronary artery disease who can be discharged immediately and higher risk patients with moderate to severe disease who warrant further workup. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT01084239. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4943281/ /pubmed/27006119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.003137 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Truong, Quynh A.
Schulman‐Marcus, Joshua
Zakroysky, Pearl
Chou, Eric T.
Nagurney, John T.
Fleg, Jerome L.
Schoenfeld, David A.
Udelson, James E.
Hoffmann, Udo
Woodard, Pamela K.
Coronary CT Angiography Versus Standard Emergency Department Evaluation for Acute Chest Pain and Diabetic Patients: Is There Benefit With Early Coronary CT Angiography?: Results of the Randomized Comparative Effectiveness ROMICAT II Trial
title Coronary CT Angiography Versus Standard Emergency Department Evaluation for Acute Chest Pain and Diabetic Patients: Is There Benefit With Early Coronary CT Angiography?: Results of the Randomized Comparative Effectiveness ROMICAT II Trial
title_full Coronary CT Angiography Versus Standard Emergency Department Evaluation for Acute Chest Pain and Diabetic Patients: Is There Benefit With Early Coronary CT Angiography?: Results of the Randomized Comparative Effectiveness ROMICAT II Trial
title_fullStr Coronary CT Angiography Versus Standard Emergency Department Evaluation for Acute Chest Pain and Diabetic Patients: Is There Benefit With Early Coronary CT Angiography?: Results of the Randomized Comparative Effectiveness ROMICAT II Trial
title_full_unstemmed Coronary CT Angiography Versus Standard Emergency Department Evaluation for Acute Chest Pain and Diabetic Patients: Is There Benefit With Early Coronary CT Angiography?: Results of the Randomized Comparative Effectiveness ROMICAT II Trial
title_short Coronary CT Angiography Versus Standard Emergency Department Evaluation for Acute Chest Pain and Diabetic Patients: Is There Benefit With Early Coronary CT Angiography?: Results of the Randomized Comparative Effectiveness ROMICAT II Trial
title_sort coronary ct angiography versus standard emergency department evaluation for acute chest pain and diabetic patients: is there benefit with early coronary ct angiography?: results of the randomized comparative effectiveness romicat ii trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4943281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27006119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.003137
work_keys_str_mv AT truongquynha coronaryctangiographyversusstandardemergencydepartmentevaluationforacutechestpainanddiabeticpatientsistherebenefitwithearlycoronaryctangiographyresultsoftherandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessromicatiitrial
AT schulmanmarcusjoshua coronaryctangiographyversusstandardemergencydepartmentevaluationforacutechestpainanddiabeticpatientsistherebenefitwithearlycoronaryctangiographyresultsoftherandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessromicatiitrial
AT zakroyskypearl coronaryctangiographyversusstandardemergencydepartmentevaluationforacutechestpainanddiabeticpatientsistherebenefitwithearlycoronaryctangiographyresultsoftherandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessromicatiitrial
AT chouerict coronaryctangiographyversusstandardemergencydepartmentevaluationforacutechestpainanddiabeticpatientsistherebenefitwithearlycoronaryctangiographyresultsoftherandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessromicatiitrial
AT nagurneyjohnt coronaryctangiographyversusstandardemergencydepartmentevaluationforacutechestpainanddiabeticpatientsistherebenefitwithearlycoronaryctangiographyresultsoftherandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessromicatiitrial
AT flegjeromel coronaryctangiographyversusstandardemergencydepartmentevaluationforacutechestpainanddiabeticpatientsistherebenefitwithearlycoronaryctangiographyresultsoftherandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessromicatiitrial
AT schoenfelddavida coronaryctangiographyversusstandardemergencydepartmentevaluationforacutechestpainanddiabeticpatientsistherebenefitwithearlycoronaryctangiographyresultsoftherandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessromicatiitrial
AT udelsonjamese coronaryctangiographyversusstandardemergencydepartmentevaluationforacutechestpainanddiabeticpatientsistherebenefitwithearlycoronaryctangiographyresultsoftherandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessromicatiitrial
AT hoffmannudo coronaryctangiographyversusstandardemergencydepartmentevaluationforacutechestpainanddiabeticpatientsistherebenefitwithearlycoronaryctangiographyresultsoftherandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessromicatiitrial
AT woodardpamelak coronaryctangiographyversusstandardemergencydepartmentevaluationforacutechestpainanddiabeticpatientsistherebenefitwithearlycoronaryctangiographyresultsoftherandomizedcomparativeeffectivenessromicatiitrial