Cargando…

Comparative analysis of survival between elderly and non-elderly severe sepsis and septic shock resuscitated patients

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes between elderly (≥65 years old) and non-elderly (<65 years old) resuscitated severe sepsis and septic shock patients and determine predictors of death among elderly patients. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including 848 severe sepsis and septic shock patients a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Palomba, Henrique, Corrêa, Thiago Domingos, Silva, Eliézer, Pardini, Andreia, de Assuncao, Murillo Santucci Cesar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4943779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26313436
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082015AO3313
_version_ 1782442647039770624
author Palomba, Henrique
Corrêa, Thiago Domingos
Silva, Eliézer
Pardini, Andreia
de Assuncao, Murillo Santucci Cesar
author_facet Palomba, Henrique
Corrêa, Thiago Domingos
Silva, Eliézer
Pardini, Andreia
de Assuncao, Murillo Santucci Cesar
author_sort Palomba, Henrique
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes between elderly (≥65 years old) and non-elderly (<65 years old) resuscitated severe sepsis and septic shock patients and determine predictors of death among elderly patients. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including 848 severe sepsis and septic shock patients admitted to the intensive care unit between January 2006 and March 2012. RESULTS: Elderly patients accounted for 62.6% (531/848) and non-elderly patients for 37.4% (317/848). Elderly patients had a higher APACHE II score [22 (18-28) versus 19 (15-24); p<0.001], compared to non-elderly patients, although the number of organ dysfunctions did not differ between the groups. No significant differences were found in 28-day and in-hospital mortality rates between elderly and non-elderly patients. The length of hospital stay was higher in elderly compared to non-elderly patients admitted with severe sepsis and septic shock [18 (10-41) versus 14 (8-29) days, respectively; p=0.0001]. Predictors of death among elderly patients included age, site of diagnosis, APACHE II score, need for mechanical ventilation and vasopressors. CONCLUSION: In this study population early resuscitation of elderly patients was not associated with increased in-hospital mortality. Prospective studies addressing the long-term impact on functional status and quality of life are necessary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4943779
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49437792016-08-10 Comparative analysis of survival between elderly and non-elderly severe sepsis and septic shock resuscitated patients Palomba, Henrique Corrêa, Thiago Domingos Silva, Eliézer Pardini, Andreia de Assuncao, Murillo Santucci Cesar Einstein (Sao Paulo) Original Article OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes between elderly (≥65 years old) and non-elderly (<65 years old) resuscitated severe sepsis and septic shock patients and determine predictors of death among elderly patients. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including 848 severe sepsis and septic shock patients admitted to the intensive care unit between January 2006 and March 2012. RESULTS: Elderly patients accounted for 62.6% (531/848) and non-elderly patients for 37.4% (317/848). Elderly patients had a higher APACHE II score [22 (18-28) versus 19 (15-24); p<0.001], compared to non-elderly patients, although the number of organ dysfunctions did not differ between the groups. No significant differences were found in 28-day and in-hospital mortality rates between elderly and non-elderly patients. The length of hospital stay was higher in elderly compared to non-elderly patients admitted with severe sepsis and septic shock [18 (10-41) versus 14 (8-29) days, respectively; p=0.0001]. Predictors of death among elderly patients included age, site of diagnosis, APACHE II score, need for mechanical ventilation and vasopressors. CONCLUSION: In this study population early resuscitation of elderly patients was not associated with increased in-hospital mortality. Prospective studies addressing the long-term impact on functional status and quality of life are necessary. Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4943779/ /pubmed/26313436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082015AO3313 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Palomba, Henrique
Corrêa, Thiago Domingos
Silva, Eliézer
Pardini, Andreia
de Assuncao, Murillo Santucci Cesar
Comparative analysis of survival between elderly and non-elderly severe sepsis and septic shock resuscitated patients
title Comparative analysis of survival between elderly and non-elderly severe sepsis and septic shock resuscitated patients
title_full Comparative analysis of survival between elderly and non-elderly severe sepsis and septic shock resuscitated patients
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of survival between elderly and non-elderly severe sepsis and septic shock resuscitated patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of survival between elderly and non-elderly severe sepsis and septic shock resuscitated patients
title_short Comparative analysis of survival between elderly and non-elderly severe sepsis and septic shock resuscitated patients
title_sort comparative analysis of survival between elderly and non-elderly severe sepsis and septic shock resuscitated patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4943779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26313436
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082015AO3313
work_keys_str_mv AT palombahenrique comparativeanalysisofsurvivalbetweenelderlyandnonelderlyseveresepsisandsepticshockresuscitatedpatients
AT correathiagodomingos comparativeanalysisofsurvivalbetweenelderlyandnonelderlyseveresepsisandsepticshockresuscitatedpatients
AT silvaeliezer comparativeanalysisofsurvivalbetweenelderlyandnonelderlyseveresepsisandsepticshockresuscitatedpatients
AT pardiniandreia comparativeanalysisofsurvivalbetweenelderlyandnonelderlyseveresepsisandsepticshockresuscitatedpatients
AT deassuncaomurillosantuccicesar comparativeanalysisofsurvivalbetweenelderlyandnonelderlyseveresepsisandsepticshockresuscitatedpatients