Cargando…
Comparative analysis of survival between elderly and non-elderly severe sepsis and septic shock resuscitated patients
OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes between elderly (≥65 years old) and non-elderly (<65 years old) resuscitated severe sepsis and septic shock patients and determine predictors of death among elderly patients. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including 848 severe sepsis and septic shock patients a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4943779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26313436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082015AO3313 |
_version_ | 1782442647039770624 |
---|---|
author | Palomba, Henrique Corrêa, Thiago Domingos Silva, Eliézer Pardini, Andreia de Assuncao, Murillo Santucci Cesar |
author_facet | Palomba, Henrique Corrêa, Thiago Domingos Silva, Eliézer Pardini, Andreia de Assuncao, Murillo Santucci Cesar |
author_sort | Palomba, Henrique |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes between elderly (≥65 years old) and non-elderly (<65 years old) resuscitated severe sepsis and septic shock patients and determine predictors of death among elderly patients. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including 848 severe sepsis and septic shock patients admitted to the intensive care unit between January 2006 and March 2012. RESULTS: Elderly patients accounted for 62.6% (531/848) and non-elderly patients for 37.4% (317/848). Elderly patients had a higher APACHE II score [22 (18-28) versus 19 (15-24); p<0.001], compared to non-elderly patients, although the number of organ dysfunctions did not differ between the groups. No significant differences were found in 28-day and in-hospital mortality rates between elderly and non-elderly patients. The length of hospital stay was higher in elderly compared to non-elderly patients admitted with severe sepsis and septic shock [18 (10-41) versus 14 (8-29) days, respectively; p=0.0001]. Predictors of death among elderly patients included age, site of diagnosis, APACHE II score, need for mechanical ventilation and vasopressors. CONCLUSION: In this study population early resuscitation of elderly patients was not associated with increased in-hospital mortality. Prospective studies addressing the long-term impact on functional status and quality of life are necessary. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4943779 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49437792016-08-10 Comparative analysis of survival between elderly and non-elderly severe sepsis and septic shock resuscitated patients Palomba, Henrique Corrêa, Thiago Domingos Silva, Eliézer Pardini, Andreia de Assuncao, Murillo Santucci Cesar Einstein (Sao Paulo) Original Article OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes between elderly (≥65 years old) and non-elderly (<65 years old) resuscitated severe sepsis and septic shock patients and determine predictors of death among elderly patients. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including 848 severe sepsis and septic shock patients admitted to the intensive care unit between January 2006 and March 2012. RESULTS: Elderly patients accounted for 62.6% (531/848) and non-elderly patients for 37.4% (317/848). Elderly patients had a higher APACHE II score [22 (18-28) versus 19 (15-24); p<0.001], compared to non-elderly patients, although the number of organ dysfunctions did not differ between the groups. No significant differences were found in 28-day and in-hospital mortality rates between elderly and non-elderly patients. The length of hospital stay was higher in elderly compared to non-elderly patients admitted with severe sepsis and septic shock [18 (10-41) versus 14 (8-29) days, respectively; p=0.0001]. Predictors of death among elderly patients included age, site of diagnosis, APACHE II score, need for mechanical ventilation and vasopressors. CONCLUSION: In this study population early resuscitation of elderly patients was not associated with increased in-hospital mortality. Prospective studies addressing the long-term impact on functional status and quality of life are necessary. Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4943779/ /pubmed/26313436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082015AO3313 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Palomba, Henrique Corrêa, Thiago Domingos Silva, Eliézer Pardini, Andreia de Assuncao, Murillo Santucci Cesar Comparative analysis of survival between elderly and non-elderly severe sepsis and septic shock resuscitated patients |
title | Comparative analysis of survival between elderly and non-elderly severe sepsis and septic shock resuscitated patients |
title_full | Comparative analysis of survival between elderly and non-elderly severe sepsis and septic shock resuscitated patients |
title_fullStr | Comparative analysis of survival between elderly and non-elderly severe sepsis and septic shock resuscitated patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis of survival between elderly and non-elderly severe sepsis and septic shock resuscitated patients |
title_short | Comparative analysis of survival between elderly and non-elderly severe sepsis and septic shock resuscitated patients |
title_sort | comparative analysis of survival between elderly and non-elderly severe sepsis and septic shock resuscitated patients |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4943779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26313436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082015AO3313 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT palombahenrique comparativeanalysisofsurvivalbetweenelderlyandnonelderlyseveresepsisandsepticshockresuscitatedpatients AT correathiagodomingos comparativeanalysisofsurvivalbetweenelderlyandnonelderlyseveresepsisandsepticshockresuscitatedpatients AT silvaeliezer comparativeanalysisofsurvivalbetweenelderlyandnonelderlyseveresepsisandsepticshockresuscitatedpatients AT pardiniandreia comparativeanalysisofsurvivalbetweenelderlyandnonelderlyseveresepsisandsepticshockresuscitatedpatients AT deassuncaomurillosantuccicesar comparativeanalysisofsurvivalbetweenelderlyandnonelderlyseveresepsisandsepticshockresuscitatedpatients |