Cargando…
Commentary: “An Evaluation of Universal Grammar and the Phonological Mind”—UG Is Still a Viable Hypothesis
Everett (2016b) criticizes The Phonological Mind thesis (Berent, 2013a,b) on logical, methodological and empirical grounds. Most of Everett’s concerns are directed toward the hypothesis that the phonological grammar is constrained by universal grammatical (UG) principles. Contrary to Everett’s logic...
Autor principal: | Berent, Iris |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4943953/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27471480 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01029 |
Ejemplares similares
-
An Evaluation of Universal Grammar and the Phonological Mind()
por: Everett, Daniel L.
Publicado: (2016) -
Phonology without universal grammar
por: Archangeli, Diana, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Phonological reduplication in sign language: Rules rule
por: Berent, Iris, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Phonology in generative grammar /
por: Kenstowicz, Michael J.
Publicado: (1994) -
Editorial: Phonological and Phonetic Competence: Between Grammar, Signal Processing, and Neural Activity
por: Domahs, Ulrike, et al.
Publicado: (2015)