Cargando…
The Influence of Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio on the Treatment Outcomes in the Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Stomach Tumors (ARTIST) Trial: A Phase III Trial
PURPOSE: In the Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Stomach Tumors (ARTIST) trial, we investigated whether chemoradiotherapy after D2 gastrectomy reduces the rate of recurrence. Recently, the ratio of metastatic lymph nodes to examined lymph nodes (N ratio) has been proposed as an independent prognostic f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Gastric Cancer Association
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4943998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27433396 http://dx.doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2016.16.2.105 |
_version_ | 1782442687128928256 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Youjin Park, Se Hoon Kim, Kyoung-Mee Choi, Min Gew Lee, Jun Ho Sohn, Tae Sung Bae, Jae Moon Kim, Sung Lee, Su Jin Kim, Seung Tae Lee, Jeeyun Park, Joon Oh Park, Young Suk Lim, Ho Yeong Kang, Won Ki |
author_facet | Kim, Youjin Park, Se Hoon Kim, Kyoung-Mee Choi, Min Gew Lee, Jun Ho Sohn, Tae Sung Bae, Jae Moon Kim, Sung Lee, Su Jin Kim, Seung Tae Lee, Jeeyun Park, Joon Oh Park, Young Suk Lim, Ho Yeong Kang, Won Ki |
author_sort | Kim, Youjin |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: In the Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Stomach Tumors (ARTIST) trial, we investigated whether chemoradiotherapy after D2 gastrectomy reduces the rate of recurrence. Recently, the ratio of metastatic lymph nodes to examined lymph nodes (N ratio) has been proposed as an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer (GC). The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the metastatic N ratio and prognosis of GC after curative D2 surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 458 ARTIST patients who underwent D2 gastrectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (XP, n=228) or chemoradiotherapy (XPRT, n=230). The disease-free survival (DFS) rates of patients were used to evaluate the influence of N ratio on the treatment outcome. To achieve this, 4 different N ratio categories (0%, 1%~9%, 10%~25%, and >25%) were compared on the basis of their influence on the treatment outcome. RESULTS: On multivariate analysis, the N ratio remained an independent prognostic factor for DFS. The hazard ratios (HRs) for the N ratio categories of 0%, 1%~9%, 10%~25%, and >25% were 1, 1.061, 1.202, and 3.571, respectively. In patients having N ratio >25%, the 5-year DFS rates were 55% and 28% for the XPRT and XP arms, respectively (HR, 0.527; 95% confidence interval, 0.307~0.904; P=0.020). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with curatively resected GC, the N ratio was independently associated with DFS. Although this finding warrants further investigation in future prospective studies, the benefit of chemoradiotherapy for D2 resected GC appears to be more beneficial in cancers having N ratios >25%. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4943998 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | The Korean Gastric Cancer Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49439982016-07-18 The Influence of Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio on the Treatment Outcomes in the Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Stomach Tumors (ARTIST) Trial: A Phase III Trial Kim, Youjin Park, Se Hoon Kim, Kyoung-Mee Choi, Min Gew Lee, Jun Ho Sohn, Tae Sung Bae, Jae Moon Kim, Sung Lee, Su Jin Kim, Seung Tae Lee, Jeeyun Park, Joon Oh Park, Young Suk Lim, Ho Yeong Kang, Won Ki J Gastric Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: In the Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Stomach Tumors (ARTIST) trial, we investigated whether chemoradiotherapy after D2 gastrectomy reduces the rate of recurrence. Recently, the ratio of metastatic lymph nodes to examined lymph nodes (N ratio) has been proposed as an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer (GC). The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the metastatic N ratio and prognosis of GC after curative D2 surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 458 ARTIST patients who underwent D2 gastrectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (XP, n=228) or chemoradiotherapy (XPRT, n=230). The disease-free survival (DFS) rates of patients were used to evaluate the influence of N ratio on the treatment outcome. To achieve this, 4 different N ratio categories (0%, 1%~9%, 10%~25%, and >25%) were compared on the basis of their influence on the treatment outcome. RESULTS: On multivariate analysis, the N ratio remained an independent prognostic factor for DFS. The hazard ratios (HRs) for the N ratio categories of 0%, 1%~9%, 10%~25%, and >25% were 1, 1.061, 1.202, and 3.571, respectively. In patients having N ratio >25%, the 5-year DFS rates were 55% and 28% for the XPRT and XP arms, respectively (HR, 0.527; 95% confidence interval, 0.307~0.904; P=0.020). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with curatively resected GC, the N ratio was independently associated with DFS. Although this finding warrants further investigation in future prospective studies, the benefit of chemoradiotherapy for D2 resected GC appears to be more beneficial in cancers having N ratios >25%. The Korean Gastric Cancer Association 2016-06 2016-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4943998/ /pubmed/27433396 http://dx.doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2016.16.2.105 Text en Copyright © 2016 by The Korean Gastric Cancer Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kim, Youjin Park, Se Hoon Kim, Kyoung-Mee Choi, Min Gew Lee, Jun Ho Sohn, Tae Sung Bae, Jae Moon Kim, Sung Lee, Su Jin Kim, Seung Tae Lee, Jeeyun Park, Joon Oh Park, Young Suk Lim, Ho Yeong Kang, Won Ki The Influence of Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio on the Treatment Outcomes in the Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Stomach Tumors (ARTIST) Trial: A Phase III Trial |
title | The Influence of Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio on the Treatment Outcomes in the Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Stomach Tumors (ARTIST) Trial: A Phase III Trial |
title_full | The Influence of Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio on the Treatment Outcomes in the Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Stomach Tumors (ARTIST) Trial: A Phase III Trial |
title_fullStr | The Influence of Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio on the Treatment Outcomes in the Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Stomach Tumors (ARTIST) Trial: A Phase III Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The Influence of Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio on the Treatment Outcomes in the Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Stomach Tumors (ARTIST) Trial: A Phase III Trial |
title_short | The Influence of Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio on the Treatment Outcomes in the Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Stomach Tumors (ARTIST) Trial: A Phase III Trial |
title_sort | influence of metastatic lymph node ratio on the treatment outcomes in the adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in stomach tumors (artist) trial: a phase iii trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4943998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27433396 http://dx.doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2016.16.2.105 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimyoujin theinfluenceofmetastaticlymphnoderatioonthetreatmentoutcomesintheadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinstomachtumorsartisttrialaphaseiiitrial AT parksehoon theinfluenceofmetastaticlymphnoderatioonthetreatmentoutcomesintheadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinstomachtumorsartisttrialaphaseiiitrial AT kimkyoungmee theinfluenceofmetastaticlymphnoderatioonthetreatmentoutcomesintheadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinstomachtumorsartisttrialaphaseiiitrial AT choimingew theinfluenceofmetastaticlymphnoderatioonthetreatmentoutcomesintheadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinstomachtumorsartisttrialaphaseiiitrial AT leejunho theinfluenceofmetastaticlymphnoderatioonthetreatmentoutcomesintheadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinstomachtumorsartisttrialaphaseiiitrial AT sohntaesung theinfluenceofmetastaticlymphnoderatioonthetreatmentoutcomesintheadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinstomachtumorsartisttrialaphaseiiitrial AT baejaemoon theinfluenceofmetastaticlymphnoderatioonthetreatmentoutcomesintheadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinstomachtumorsartisttrialaphaseiiitrial AT kimsung theinfluenceofmetastaticlymphnoderatioonthetreatmentoutcomesintheadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinstomachtumorsartisttrialaphaseiiitrial AT leesujin theinfluenceofmetastaticlymphnoderatioonthetreatmentoutcomesintheadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinstomachtumorsartisttrialaphaseiiitrial AT kimseungtae theinfluenceofmetastaticlymphnoderatioonthetreatmentoutcomesintheadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinstomachtumorsartisttrialaphaseiiitrial AT leejeeyun theinfluenceofmetastaticlymphnoderatioonthetreatmentoutcomesintheadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinstomachtumorsartisttrialaphaseiiitrial AT parkjoonoh theinfluenceofmetastaticlymphnoderatioonthetreatmentoutcomesintheadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinstomachtumorsartisttrialaphaseiiitrial AT parkyoungsuk theinfluenceofmetastaticlymphnoderatioonthetreatmentoutcomesintheadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinstomachtumorsartisttrialaphaseiiitrial AT limhoyeong theinfluenceofmetastaticlymphnoderatioonthetreatmentoutcomesintheadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinstomachtumorsartisttrialaphaseiiitrial AT kangwonki theinfluenceofmetastaticlymphnoderatioonthetreatmentoutcomesintheadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinstomachtumorsartisttrialaphaseiiitrial AT kimyoujin influenceofmetastaticlymphnoderatioonthetreatmentoutcomesintheadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinstomachtumorsartisttrialaphaseiiitrial AT parksehoon influenceofmetastaticlymphnoderatioonthetreatmentoutcomesintheadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinstomachtumorsartisttrialaphaseiiitrial AT kimkyoungmee influenceofmetastaticlymphnoderatioonthetreatmentoutcomesintheadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinstomachtumorsartisttrialaphaseiiitrial AT choimingew influenceofmetastaticlymphnoderatioonthetreatmentoutcomesintheadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinstomachtumorsartisttrialaphaseiiitrial AT leejunho influenceofmetastaticlymphnoderatioonthetreatmentoutcomesintheadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinstomachtumorsartisttrialaphaseiiitrial AT sohntaesung influenceofmetastaticlymphnoderatioonthetreatmentoutcomesintheadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinstomachtumorsartisttrialaphaseiiitrial AT baejaemoon influenceofmetastaticlymphnoderatioonthetreatmentoutcomesintheadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinstomachtumorsartisttrialaphaseiiitrial AT kimsung influenceofmetastaticlymphnoderatioonthetreatmentoutcomesintheadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinstomachtumorsartisttrialaphaseiiitrial AT leesujin influenceofmetastaticlymphnoderatioonthetreatmentoutcomesintheadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinstomachtumorsartisttrialaphaseiiitrial AT kimseungtae influenceofmetastaticlymphnoderatioonthetreatmentoutcomesintheadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinstomachtumorsartisttrialaphaseiiitrial AT leejeeyun influenceofmetastaticlymphnoderatioonthetreatmentoutcomesintheadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinstomachtumorsartisttrialaphaseiiitrial AT parkjoonoh influenceofmetastaticlymphnoderatioonthetreatmentoutcomesintheadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinstomachtumorsartisttrialaphaseiiitrial AT parkyoungsuk influenceofmetastaticlymphnoderatioonthetreatmentoutcomesintheadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinstomachtumorsartisttrialaphaseiiitrial AT limhoyeong influenceofmetastaticlymphnoderatioonthetreatmentoutcomesintheadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinstomachtumorsartisttrialaphaseiiitrial AT kangwonki influenceofmetastaticlymphnoderatioonthetreatmentoutcomesintheadjuvantchemoradiotherapyinstomachtumorsartisttrialaphaseiiitrial |