Cargando…

Clinician's Attitudes to the Introduction of Routine Weighing in Pregnancy

Background. Excessive gestational weight gain poses significant short- and long-term health risks to both mother and baby. Professional bodies and health services increasingly recommend greater attention be paid to weight gain in pregnancy. A large Australian tertiary maternity hospital plans to fac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hasted, Tim, Stapleton, Helen, Beckmann, Michael M., Wilkinson, Shelley A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4944081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27446614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2049673
_version_ 1782442706029510656
author Hasted, Tim
Stapleton, Helen
Beckmann, Michael M.
Wilkinson, Shelley A.
author_facet Hasted, Tim
Stapleton, Helen
Beckmann, Michael M.
Wilkinson, Shelley A.
author_sort Hasted, Tim
collection PubMed
description Background. Excessive gestational weight gain poses significant short- and long-term health risks to both mother and baby. Professional bodies and health services increasingly recommend greater attention be paid to weight gain in pregnancy. A large Australian tertiary maternity hospital plans to facilitate the (re)introduction of routine weighing of all women at every antenatal visit. Objective. To identify clinicians' perspectives of barriers and enablers to routinely weighing pregnant women and variations in current practice, knowledge, and attitudes between different staff groups. Method. Forty-four maternity staff from three professional groups were interviewed in four focus groups. Staff included midwives; medical staff; and dietitians. Transcripts underwent qualitative content analysis to identify and examine barriers and enablers to the routine weighing of women throughout pregnancy. Results. While most staff supported routine weighing, various concerns were raised. Issues included access to resources and staff; the ability to provide appropriate counselling and evidence-based interventions; and the impact of weighing on patients and the therapeutic relationship. Conclusion. Many clinicians supported the practice of routine weighing in pregnancy, but barriers were also identified. Implementation strategies will be tailored to the discrete professional groups and will address identified gaps in knowledge, resources, and clinician skills and confidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4944081
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49440812016-07-21 Clinician's Attitudes to the Introduction of Routine Weighing in Pregnancy Hasted, Tim Stapleton, Helen Beckmann, Michael M. Wilkinson, Shelley A. J Pregnancy Research Article Background. Excessive gestational weight gain poses significant short- and long-term health risks to both mother and baby. Professional bodies and health services increasingly recommend greater attention be paid to weight gain in pregnancy. A large Australian tertiary maternity hospital plans to facilitate the (re)introduction of routine weighing of all women at every antenatal visit. Objective. To identify clinicians' perspectives of barriers and enablers to routinely weighing pregnant women and variations in current practice, knowledge, and attitudes between different staff groups. Method. Forty-four maternity staff from three professional groups were interviewed in four focus groups. Staff included midwives; medical staff; and dietitians. Transcripts underwent qualitative content analysis to identify and examine barriers and enablers to the routine weighing of women throughout pregnancy. Results. While most staff supported routine weighing, various concerns were raised. Issues included access to resources and staff; the ability to provide appropriate counselling and evidence-based interventions; and the impact of weighing on patients and the therapeutic relationship. Conclusion. Many clinicians supported the practice of routine weighing in pregnancy, but barriers were also identified. Implementation strategies will be tailored to the discrete professional groups and will address identified gaps in knowledge, resources, and clinician skills and confidence. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4944081/ /pubmed/27446614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2049673 Text en Copyright © 2016 Tim Hasted et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hasted, Tim
Stapleton, Helen
Beckmann, Michael M.
Wilkinson, Shelley A.
Clinician's Attitudes to the Introduction of Routine Weighing in Pregnancy
title Clinician's Attitudes to the Introduction of Routine Weighing in Pregnancy
title_full Clinician's Attitudes to the Introduction of Routine Weighing in Pregnancy
title_fullStr Clinician's Attitudes to the Introduction of Routine Weighing in Pregnancy
title_full_unstemmed Clinician's Attitudes to the Introduction of Routine Weighing in Pregnancy
title_short Clinician's Attitudes to the Introduction of Routine Weighing in Pregnancy
title_sort clinician's attitudes to the introduction of routine weighing in pregnancy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4944081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27446614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2049673
work_keys_str_mv AT hastedtim cliniciansattitudestotheintroductionofroutineweighinginpregnancy
AT stapletonhelen cliniciansattitudestotheintroductionofroutineweighinginpregnancy
AT beckmannmichaelm cliniciansattitudestotheintroductionofroutineweighinginpregnancy
AT wilkinsonshelleya cliniciansattitudestotheintroductionofroutineweighinginpregnancy