Cargando…

Knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, values, preferences, and feasibility in relation to the use of injection safety devices in healthcare settings: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Adopting technologies such as injection safety devices in healthcare settings can enhance injection safety. Developing guidelines for appropriate adoption of such technologies need to consider factors beyond evidence for their health effects. The objective of this study is to systematica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tarabay, Rami, El Rassi, Rola, Dakik, Abeer, Harb, Alain, Ballout, Rami A., Diab, Batoul, Khamassi, Selma, Akl, Elie A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4944234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27412354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0505-8
_version_ 1782442734042218496
author Tarabay, Rami
El Rassi, Rola
Dakik, Abeer
Harb, Alain
Ballout, Rami A.
Diab, Batoul
Khamassi, Selma
Akl, Elie A.
author_facet Tarabay, Rami
El Rassi, Rola
Dakik, Abeer
Harb, Alain
Ballout, Rami A.
Diab, Batoul
Khamassi, Selma
Akl, Elie A.
author_sort Tarabay, Rami
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Adopting technologies such as injection safety devices in healthcare settings can enhance injection safety. Developing guidelines for appropriate adoption of such technologies need to consider factors beyond evidence for their health effects. The objective of this study is to systematically review the published literature for evidence among healthcare workers and patients about knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, values, preferences, and feasibility in relation to the use of injection safety devices in healthcare settings. METHODS: We included both qualitative and quantitative studies conducted with the general public, patients, and healthcare workers, administrators, or policy makers. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINHAL and CENTRAL. We used a duplicate and independent approach to title and abstract screening, full text screening, data abstraction and risk of bias assessment. RESULTS: Out of a total of 6568 identified citations, we judged fourteen studies as eligible for this systematic review. All these studies were surveys, conducted with healthcare workers in high-income countries. We did not identify any qualitative study, or a study of the general public, patients, healthcare administrators or policy makers. We did not identify any study assessing knowledge, or values assigned to outcomes relevant to injection safety devices. Each of the included studies suffered from methodological limitations, which lowers our confidence in their findings. Based on the findings of six studies, the injection safety devices were generally perceived as easy to use and as an improvement compared with conventional syringes. Some of these studies reported few technical problems while using the devices. In three studies assessing perceived safety, the majority of participants judged the devices as safe. Two studies reported positive perceptions of healthcare workers regarding patient tolerance of these injection safety devices. One study found that less than half the nurses felt comfortable using the insulin pens. Findings from four studies assessing preference and satisfaction were not consistent. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review identified evidence that injection safety devices are generally perceived as easy to use, safe, and tolerated by patients. There were few reports of technical problems while using the devices and some discomfort by nurses using the insulin pens. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12955-016-0505-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4944234
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49442342016-07-15 Knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, values, preferences, and feasibility in relation to the use of injection safety devices in healthcare settings: a systematic review Tarabay, Rami El Rassi, Rola Dakik, Abeer Harb, Alain Ballout, Rami A. Diab, Batoul Khamassi, Selma Akl, Elie A. Health Qual Life Outcomes Review BACKGROUND: Adopting technologies such as injection safety devices in healthcare settings can enhance injection safety. Developing guidelines for appropriate adoption of such technologies need to consider factors beyond evidence for their health effects. The objective of this study is to systematically review the published literature for evidence among healthcare workers and patients about knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, values, preferences, and feasibility in relation to the use of injection safety devices in healthcare settings. METHODS: We included both qualitative and quantitative studies conducted with the general public, patients, and healthcare workers, administrators, or policy makers. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINHAL and CENTRAL. We used a duplicate and independent approach to title and abstract screening, full text screening, data abstraction and risk of bias assessment. RESULTS: Out of a total of 6568 identified citations, we judged fourteen studies as eligible for this systematic review. All these studies were surveys, conducted with healthcare workers in high-income countries. We did not identify any qualitative study, or a study of the general public, patients, healthcare administrators or policy makers. We did not identify any study assessing knowledge, or values assigned to outcomes relevant to injection safety devices. Each of the included studies suffered from methodological limitations, which lowers our confidence in their findings. Based on the findings of six studies, the injection safety devices were generally perceived as easy to use and as an improvement compared with conventional syringes. Some of these studies reported few technical problems while using the devices. In three studies assessing perceived safety, the majority of participants judged the devices as safe. Two studies reported positive perceptions of healthcare workers regarding patient tolerance of these injection safety devices. One study found that less than half the nurses felt comfortable using the insulin pens. Findings from four studies assessing preference and satisfaction were not consistent. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review identified evidence that injection safety devices are generally perceived as easy to use, safe, and tolerated by patients. There were few reports of technical problems while using the devices and some discomfort by nurses using the insulin pens. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12955-016-0505-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4944234/ /pubmed/27412354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0505-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Tarabay, Rami
El Rassi, Rola
Dakik, Abeer
Harb, Alain
Ballout, Rami A.
Diab, Batoul
Khamassi, Selma
Akl, Elie A.
Knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, values, preferences, and feasibility in relation to the use of injection safety devices in healthcare settings: a systematic review
title Knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, values, preferences, and feasibility in relation to the use of injection safety devices in healthcare settings: a systematic review
title_full Knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, values, preferences, and feasibility in relation to the use of injection safety devices in healthcare settings: a systematic review
title_fullStr Knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, values, preferences, and feasibility in relation to the use of injection safety devices in healthcare settings: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, values, preferences, and feasibility in relation to the use of injection safety devices in healthcare settings: a systematic review
title_short Knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, values, preferences, and feasibility in relation to the use of injection safety devices in healthcare settings: a systematic review
title_sort knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, values, preferences, and feasibility in relation to the use of injection safety devices in healthcare settings: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4944234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27412354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0505-8
work_keys_str_mv AT tarabayrami knowledgeattitudesbeliefsvaluespreferencesandfeasibilityinrelationtotheuseofinjectionsafetydevicesinhealthcaresettingsasystematicreview
AT elrassirola knowledgeattitudesbeliefsvaluespreferencesandfeasibilityinrelationtotheuseofinjectionsafetydevicesinhealthcaresettingsasystematicreview
AT dakikabeer knowledgeattitudesbeliefsvaluespreferencesandfeasibilityinrelationtotheuseofinjectionsafetydevicesinhealthcaresettingsasystematicreview
AT harbalain knowledgeattitudesbeliefsvaluespreferencesandfeasibilityinrelationtotheuseofinjectionsafetydevicesinhealthcaresettingsasystematicreview
AT balloutramia knowledgeattitudesbeliefsvaluespreferencesandfeasibilityinrelationtotheuseofinjectionsafetydevicesinhealthcaresettingsasystematicreview
AT diabbatoul knowledgeattitudesbeliefsvaluespreferencesandfeasibilityinrelationtotheuseofinjectionsafetydevicesinhealthcaresettingsasystematicreview
AT khamassiselma knowledgeattitudesbeliefsvaluespreferencesandfeasibilityinrelationtotheuseofinjectionsafetydevicesinhealthcaresettingsasystematicreview
AT akleliea knowledgeattitudesbeliefsvaluespreferencesandfeasibilityinrelationtotheuseofinjectionsafetydevicesinhealthcaresettingsasystematicreview