Cargando…
A randomized controlled trial to compare a restrictive strategy to usual care for the effectiveness of cholecystectomy in patients with symptomatic gallstones (SECURE trial protocol)
BACKGROUND: Five to 22 % of the adult Western population has gallstones. Among them, 13 to 22 % become symptomatic during their lifetime. Cholecystectomy is the preferred treatment for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Remarkably, cholecystectomy provides symptom relief in only 60-70 % of patients. T...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4944479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27411788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-016-0160-3 |
_version_ | 1782442772258619392 |
---|---|
author | de Reuver, P. R. van Dijk, A. H. Wennmacker, S. Z. Lamberts, M. P. Boerma, D. den Oudsten, B. L. Dijkgraaf, M. G. W. Donkervoort, S. C. Roukema, J. A. Westert, G. P. Drenth, J. P. H. van Laarhoven, C. J. H. Boermeester, M. A. |
author_facet | de Reuver, P. R. van Dijk, A. H. Wennmacker, S. Z. Lamberts, M. P. Boerma, D. den Oudsten, B. L. Dijkgraaf, M. G. W. Donkervoort, S. C. Roukema, J. A. Westert, G. P. Drenth, J. P. H. van Laarhoven, C. J. H. Boermeester, M. A. |
author_sort | de Reuver, P. R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Five to 22 % of the adult Western population has gallstones. Among them, 13 to 22 % become symptomatic during their lifetime. Cholecystectomy is the preferred treatment for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Remarkably, cholecystectomy provides symptom relief in only 60-70 % of patients. The objective of this trial is to compare the effectiveness of usual (operative) care with a restrictive strategy using a standardized work-up with stepwise selection for cholecystectomy in patients with gallstones and abdominal complaints. DESIGN AND METHODS: The SECURE-trial is designed as a multicenter, randomized, parallel-arm, non-inferiority trial in patients with abdominal symptoms and ultrasound proven gallstones or sludge. If patients meet the inclusion criteria they will be randomized to either usual care or the restrictive strategy. Patients in the usual care group will be treated according to the physician’s knowledge and preference. Patients in the restrictive care group will be treated with interval evaluation and stepwise selection for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In this stepwise selection, patients strictly meeting the preselected criteria for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis will be offered a cholecystectomy. Patients not meeting these criteria will be assessed for other diagnoses and re-evaluated at 3-monthly intervals. Follow-up consists of web-based questionnaires at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. The main end point of this trial is defined as the proportion of patients being pain-free at 12 months follow-up. Pain will be assessed with the Izbicki Pain Score and Gallstone Symptom Score. Secondary endpoints will be the proportion of patients with complications due to gallstones or cholecystectomy, the association between the patients’ symptoms and treatment and work performance, and ultimately, cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION: The SECURE trial is the first randomized controlled trial examining the effectiveness of usual care versus restrictive care in patients with symptomatic gallstones. The outcome of this trial will inform clinicians whether a more restrictive strategy can minimize persistent pain in post-operative patients at least as good as usual care does, but at a lower cholecystectomy rate. (The Netherlands National Trial Register NTR4022, 17th December 2012) TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Netherlands National Trial Register NTR4022 http://www.zonmw.nl/nl/projecten/project-detail/scrutinizing-inefficient-use-of-cholecystectomy-a-randomized-trial-concerning-variation-in-practi/samenvatting/ |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4944479 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49444792016-07-15 A randomized controlled trial to compare a restrictive strategy to usual care for the effectiveness of cholecystectomy in patients with symptomatic gallstones (SECURE trial protocol) de Reuver, P. R. van Dijk, A. H. Wennmacker, S. Z. Lamberts, M. P. Boerma, D. den Oudsten, B. L. Dijkgraaf, M. G. W. Donkervoort, S. C. Roukema, J. A. Westert, G. P. Drenth, J. P. H. van Laarhoven, C. J. H. Boermeester, M. A. BMC Surg Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Five to 22 % of the adult Western population has gallstones. Among them, 13 to 22 % become symptomatic during their lifetime. Cholecystectomy is the preferred treatment for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Remarkably, cholecystectomy provides symptom relief in only 60-70 % of patients. The objective of this trial is to compare the effectiveness of usual (operative) care with a restrictive strategy using a standardized work-up with stepwise selection for cholecystectomy in patients with gallstones and abdominal complaints. DESIGN AND METHODS: The SECURE-trial is designed as a multicenter, randomized, parallel-arm, non-inferiority trial in patients with abdominal symptoms and ultrasound proven gallstones or sludge. If patients meet the inclusion criteria they will be randomized to either usual care or the restrictive strategy. Patients in the usual care group will be treated according to the physician’s knowledge and preference. Patients in the restrictive care group will be treated with interval evaluation and stepwise selection for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In this stepwise selection, patients strictly meeting the preselected criteria for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis will be offered a cholecystectomy. Patients not meeting these criteria will be assessed for other diagnoses and re-evaluated at 3-monthly intervals. Follow-up consists of web-based questionnaires at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. The main end point of this trial is defined as the proportion of patients being pain-free at 12 months follow-up. Pain will be assessed with the Izbicki Pain Score and Gallstone Symptom Score. Secondary endpoints will be the proportion of patients with complications due to gallstones or cholecystectomy, the association between the patients’ symptoms and treatment and work performance, and ultimately, cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION: The SECURE trial is the first randomized controlled trial examining the effectiveness of usual care versus restrictive care in patients with symptomatic gallstones. The outcome of this trial will inform clinicians whether a more restrictive strategy can minimize persistent pain in post-operative patients at least as good as usual care does, but at a lower cholecystectomy rate. (The Netherlands National Trial Register NTR4022, 17th December 2012) TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Netherlands National Trial Register NTR4022 http://www.zonmw.nl/nl/projecten/project-detail/scrutinizing-inefficient-use-of-cholecystectomy-a-randomized-trial-concerning-variation-in-practi/samenvatting/ BioMed Central 2016-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4944479/ /pubmed/27411788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-016-0160-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol de Reuver, P. R. van Dijk, A. H. Wennmacker, S. Z. Lamberts, M. P. Boerma, D. den Oudsten, B. L. Dijkgraaf, M. G. W. Donkervoort, S. C. Roukema, J. A. Westert, G. P. Drenth, J. P. H. van Laarhoven, C. J. H. Boermeester, M. A. A randomized controlled trial to compare a restrictive strategy to usual care for the effectiveness of cholecystectomy in patients with symptomatic gallstones (SECURE trial protocol) |
title | A randomized controlled trial to compare a restrictive strategy to usual care for the effectiveness of cholecystectomy in patients with symptomatic gallstones (SECURE trial protocol) |
title_full | A randomized controlled trial to compare a restrictive strategy to usual care for the effectiveness of cholecystectomy in patients with symptomatic gallstones (SECURE trial protocol) |
title_fullStr | A randomized controlled trial to compare a restrictive strategy to usual care for the effectiveness of cholecystectomy in patients with symptomatic gallstones (SECURE trial protocol) |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomized controlled trial to compare a restrictive strategy to usual care for the effectiveness of cholecystectomy in patients with symptomatic gallstones (SECURE trial protocol) |
title_short | A randomized controlled trial to compare a restrictive strategy to usual care for the effectiveness of cholecystectomy in patients with symptomatic gallstones (SECURE trial protocol) |
title_sort | randomized controlled trial to compare a restrictive strategy to usual care for the effectiveness of cholecystectomy in patients with symptomatic gallstones (secure trial protocol) |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4944479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27411788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-016-0160-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dereuverpr arandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol AT vandijkah arandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol AT wennmackersz arandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol AT lambertsmp arandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol AT boermad arandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol AT denoudstenbl arandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol AT dijkgraafmgw arandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol AT donkervoortsc arandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol AT roukemaja arandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol AT westertgp arandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol AT drenthjph arandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol AT vanlaarhovencjh arandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol AT boermeesterma arandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol AT dereuverpr randomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol AT vandijkah randomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol AT wennmackersz randomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol AT lambertsmp randomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol AT boermad randomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol AT denoudstenbl randomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol AT dijkgraafmgw randomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol AT donkervoortsc randomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol AT roukemaja randomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol AT westertgp randomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol AT drenthjph randomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol AT vanlaarhovencjh randomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol AT boermeesterma randomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol |