Cargando…

A randomized controlled trial to compare a restrictive strategy to usual care for the effectiveness of cholecystectomy in patients with symptomatic gallstones (SECURE trial protocol)

BACKGROUND: Five to 22 % of the adult Western population has gallstones. Among them, 13 to 22 % become symptomatic during their lifetime. Cholecystectomy is the preferred treatment for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Remarkably, cholecystectomy provides symptom relief in only 60-70 % of patients. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Reuver, P. R., van Dijk, A. H., Wennmacker, S. Z., Lamberts, M. P., Boerma, D., den Oudsten, B. L., Dijkgraaf, M. G. W., Donkervoort, S. C., Roukema, J. A., Westert, G. P., Drenth, J. P. H., van Laarhoven, C. J. H., Boermeester, M. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4944479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27411788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-016-0160-3
_version_ 1782442772258619392
author de Reuver, P. R.
van Dijk, A. H.
Wennmacker, S. Z.
Lamberts, M. P.
Boerma, D.
den Oudsten, B. L.
Dijkgraaf, M. G. W.
Donkervoort, S. C.
Roukema, J. A.
Westert, G. P.
Drenth, J. P. H.
van Laarhoven, C. J. H.
Boermeester, M. A.
author_facet de Reuver, P. R.
van Dijk, A. H.
Wennmacker, S. Z.
Lamberts, M. P.
Boerma, D.
den Oudsten, B. L.
Dijkgraaf, M. G. W.
Donkervoort, S. C.
Roukema, J. A.
Westert, G. P.
Drenth, J. P. H.
van Laarhoven, C. J. H.
Boermeester, M. A.
author_sort de Reuver, P. R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Five to 22 % of the adult Western population has gallstones. Among them, 13 to 22 % become symptomatic during their lifetime. Cholecystectomy is the preferred treatment for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Remarkably, cholecystectomy provides symptom relief in only 60-70 % of patients. The objective of this trial is to compare the effectiveness of usual (operative) care with a restrictive strategy using a standardized work-up with stepwise selection for cholecystectomy in patients with gallstones and abdominal complaints. DESIGN AND METHODS: The SECURE-trial is designed as a multicenter, randomized, parallel-arm, non-inferiority trial in patients with abdominal symptoms and ultrasound proven gallstones or sludge. If patients meet the inclusion criteria they will be randomized to either usual care or the restrictive strategy. Patients in the usual care group will be treated according to the physician’s knowledge and preference. Patients in the restrictive care group will be treated with interval evaluation and stepwise selection for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In this stepwise selection, patients strictly meeting the preselected criteria for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis will be offered a cholecystectomy. Patients not meeting these criteria will be assessed for other diagnoses and re-evaluated at 3-monthly intervals. Follow-up consists of web-based questionnaires at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. The main end point of this trial is defined as the proportion of patients being pain-free at 12 months follow-up. Pain will be assessed with the Izbicki Pain Score and Gallstone Symptom Score. Secondary endpoints will be the proportion of patients with complications due to gallstones or cholecystectomy, the association between the patients’ symptoms and treatment and work performance, and ultimately, cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION: The SECURE trial is the first randomized controlled trial examining the effectiveness of usual care versus restrictive care in patients with symptomatic gallstones. The outcome of this trial will inform clinicians whether a more restrictive strategy can minimize persistent pain in post-operative patients at least as good as usual care does, but at a lower cholecystectomy rate. (The Netherlands National Trial Register NTR4022, 17th December 2012) TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Netherlands National Trial Register NTR4022 http://www.zonmw.nl/nl/projecten/project-detail/scrutinizing-inefficient-use-of-cholecystectomy-a-randomized-trial-concerning-variation-in-practi/samenvatting/
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4944479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49444792016-07-15 A randomized controlled trial to compare a restrictive strategy to usual care for the effectiveness of cholecystectomy in patients with symptomatic gallstones (SECURE trial protocol) de Reuver, P. R. van Dijk, A. H. Wennmacker, S. Z. Lamberts, M. P. Boerma, D. den Oudsten, B. L. Dijkgraaf, M. G. W. Donkervoort, S. C. Roukema, J. A. Westert, G. P. Drenth, J. P. H. van Laarhoven, C. J. H. Boermeester, M. A. BMC Surg Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Five to 22 % of the adult Western population has gallstones. Among them, 13 to 22 % become symptomatic during their lifetime. Cholecystectomy is the preferred treatment for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Remarkably, cholecystectomy provides symptom relief in only 60-70 % of patients. The objective of this trial is to compare the effectiveness of usual (operative) care with a restrictive strategy using a standardized work-up with stepwise selection for cholecystectomy in patients with gallstones and abdominal complaints. DESIGN AND METHODS: The SECURE-trial is designed as a multicenter, randomized, parallel-arm, non-inferiority trial in patients with abdominal symptoms and ultrasound proven gallstones or sludge. If patients meet the inclusion criteria they will be randomized to either usual care or the restrictive strategy. Patients in the usual care group will be treated according to the physician’s knowledge and preference. Patients in the restrictive care group will be treated with interval evaluation and stepwise selection for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In this stepwise selection, patients strictly meeting the preselected criteria for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis will be offered a cholecystectomy. Patients not meeting these criteria will be assessed for other diagnoses and re-evaluated at 3-monthly intervals. Follow-up consists of web-based questionnaires at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. The main end point of this trial is defined as the proportion of patients being pain-free at 12 months follow-up. Pain will be assessed with the Izbicki Pain Score and Gallstone Symptom Score. Secondary endpoints will be the proportion of patients with complications due to gallstones or cholecystectomy, the association between the patients’ symptoms and treatment and work performance, and ultimately, cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION: The SECURE trial is the first randomized controlled trial examining the effectiveness of usual care versus restrictive care in patients with symptomatic gallstones. The outcome of this trial will inform clinicians whether a more restrictive strategy can minimize persistent pain in post-operative patients at least as good as usual care does, but at a lower cholecystectomy rate. (The Netherlands National Trial Register NTR4022, 17th December 2012) TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Netherlands National Trial Register NTR4022 http://www.zonmw.nl/nl/projecten/project-detail/scrutinizing-inefficient-use-of-cholecystectomy-a-randomized-trial-concerning-variation-in-practi/samenvatting/ BioMed Central 2016-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4944479/ /pubmed/27411788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-016-0160-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
de Reuver, P. R.
van Dijk, A. H.
Wennmacker, S. Z.
Lamberts, M. P.
Boerma, D.
den Oudsten, B. L.
Dijkgraaf, M. G. W.
Donkervoort, S. C.
Roukema, J. A.
Westert, G. P.
Drenth, J. P. H.
van Laarhoven, C. J. H.
Boermeester, M. A.
A randomized controlled trial to compare a restrictive strategy to usual care for the effectiveness of cholecystectomy in patients with symptomatic gallstones (SECURE trial protocol)
title A randomized controlled trial to compare a restrictive strategy to usual care for the effectiveness of cholecystectomy in patients with symptomatic gallstones (SECURE trial protocol)
title_full A randomized controlled trial to compare a restrictive strategy to usual care for the effectiveness of cholecystectomy in patients with symptomatic gallstones (SECURE trial protocol)
title_fullStr A randomized controlled trial to compare a restrictive strategy to usual care for the effectiveness of cholecystectomy in patients with symptomatic gallstones (SECURE trial protocol)
title_full_unstemmed A randomized controlled trial to compare a restrictive strategy to usual care for the effectiveness of cholecystectomy in patients with symptomatic gallstones (SECURE trial protocol)
title_short A randomized controlled trial to compare a restrictive strategy to usual care for the effectiveness of cholecystectomy in patients with symptomatic gallstones (SECURE trial protocol)
title_sort randomized controlled trial to compare a restrictive strategy to usual care for the effectiveness of cholecystectomy in patients with symptomatic gallstones (secure trial protocol)
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4944479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27411788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-016-0160-3
work_keys_str_mv AT dereuverpr arandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol
AT vandijkah arandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol
AT wennmackersz arandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol
AT lambertsmp arandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol
AT boermad arandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol
AT denoudstenbl arandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol
AT dijkgraafmgw arandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol
AT donkervoortsc arandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol
AT roukemaja arandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol
AT westertgp arandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol
AT drenthjph arandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol
AT vanlaarhovencjh arandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol
AT boermeesterma arandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol
AT dereuverpr randomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol
AT vandijkah randomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol
AT wennmackersz randomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol
AT lambertsmp randomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol
AT boermad randomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol
AT denoudstenbl randomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol
AT dijkgraafmgw randomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol
AT donkervoortsc randomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol
AT roukemaja randomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol
AT westertgp randomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol
AT drenthjph randomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol
AT vanlaarhovencjh randomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol
AT boermeesterma randomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomyinpatientswithsymptomaticgallstonessecuretrialprotocol