Cargando…
Review of biomarkers in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: helpful tools or just playing tricks?
BACKGROUND: Diagnosing systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SJIA) can be extremely challenging if typical arthritis is lacking. A variety of biomarkers have been described for the diagnosis and management of SJIA. However, very few markers have been well-validated. In addition, increasing numbers...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4944486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27411444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-016-1069-z |
_version_ | 1782442773822046208 |
---|---|
author | Gohar, Faekah Kessel, Christoph Lavric, Miha Holzinger, Dirk Foell, Dirk |
author_facet | Gohar, Faekah Kessel, Christoph Lavric, Miha Holzinger, Dirk Foell, Dirk |
author_sort | Gohar, Faekah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Diagnosing systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SJIA) can be extremely challenging if typical arthritis is lacking. A variety of biomarkers have been described for the diagnosis and management of SJIA. However, very few markers have been well-validated. In addition, increasing numbers of biomarkers are identified by high throughput or multi-marker panels. METHOD: We identified diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers by systematic literature review, evaluating each according to a predefined level of verification, validation or clinical utility. Diagnostic biomarkers were those identifying SJIA versus (1) non-SJIA conditions or healthy controls (HC) or (2) other non-systemic JIA subtypes. Prognostic biomarkers were those specifically tested for the prediction of (1) disease flare, (2) increased disease activity +/- discrimination of active versus inactive disease, or (3) macrophage activation syndrome (MAS). RESULTS: Fifty-five studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria identifying 68 unique biomarkers, of which 50/68 (74 %) were investigated by only a single research group. Candidate marker verification and clinical utility was evaluated according to whether markers were readily and reliably measurable, investigated by independent study groups, discovered by more than one method (i.e. verified markers) and validated in independent cohorts. This evaluation revealed diagnostic biomarkers of high interest for further evaluation in the diagnostic approach to SJIA that included heme oxygenase-1, interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-12, IL-18, osteoprotegerin, S100 calcium-binding protein A12 (S100A12) and S100A8/A9. CONCLUSION: In summary, a number of biomarkers were identified, though most had limited evidence for their use. However, our findings combined with the identified studies could inform validation studies, whether in single or multi-marker assays, which are urgently needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13075-016-1069-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4944486 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49444862016-07-15 Review of biomarkers in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: helpful tools or just playing tricks? Gohar, Faekah Kessel, Christoph Lavric, Miha Holzinger, Dirk Foell, Dirk Arthritis Res Ther Research Article BACKGROUND: Diagnosing systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SJIA) can be extremely challenging if typical arthritis is lacking. A variety of biomarkers have been described for the diagnosis and management of SJIA. However, very few markers have been well-validated. In addition, increasing numbers of biomarkers are identified by high throughput or multi-marker panels. METHOD: We identified diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers by systematic literature review, evaluating each according to a predefined level of verification, validation or clinical utility. Diagnostic biomarkers were those identifying SJIA versus (1) non-SJIA conditions or healthy controls (HC) or (2) other non-systemic JIA subtypes. Prognostic biomarkers were those specifically tested for the prediction of (1) disease flare, (2) increased disease activity +/- discrimination of active versus inactive disease, or (3) macrophage activation syndrome (MAS). RESULTS: Fifty-five studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria identifying 68 unique biomarkers, of which 50/68 (74 %) were investigated by only a single research group. Candidate marker verification and clinical utility was evaluated according to whether markers were readily and reliably measurable, investigated by independent study groups, discovered by more than one method (i.e. verified markers) and validated in independent cohorts. This evaluation revealed diagnostic biomarkers of high interest for further evaluation in the diagnostic approach to SJIA that included heme oxygenase-1, interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-12, IL-18, osteoprotegerin, S100 calcium-binding protein A12 (S100A12) and S100A8/A9. CONCLUSION: In summary, a number of biomarkers were identified, though most had limited evidence for their use. However, our findings combined with the identified studies could inform validation studies, whether in single or multi-marker assays, which are urgently needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13075-016-1069-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-07-13 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4944486/ /pubmed/27411444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-016-1069-z Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gohar, Faekah Kessel, Christoph Lavric, Miha Holzinger, Dirk Foell, Dirk Review of biomarkers in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: helpful tools or just playing tricks? |
title | Review of biomarkers in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: helpful tools or just playing tricks? |
title_full | Review of biomarkers in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: helpful tools or just playing tricks? |
title_fullStr | Review of biomarkers in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: helpful tools or just playing tricks? |
title_full_unstemmed | Review of biomarkers in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: helpful tools or just playing tricks? |
title_short | Review of biomarkers in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: helpful tools or just playing tricks? |
title_sort | review of biomarkers in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: helpful tools or just playing tricks? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4944486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27411444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-016-1069-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goharfaekah reviewofbiomarkersinsystemicjuvenileidiopathicarthritishelpfultoolsorjustplayingtricks AT kesselchristoph reviewofbiomarkersinsystemicjuvenileidiopathicarthritishelpfultoolsorjustplayingtricks AT lavricmiha reviewofbiomarkersinsystemicjuvenileidiopathicarthritishelpfultoolsorjustplayingtricks AT holzingerdirk reviewofbiomarkersinsystemicjuvenileidiopathicarthritishelpfultoolsorjustplayingtricks AT foelldirk reviewofbiomarkersinsystemicjuvenileidiopathicarthritishelpfultoolsorjustplayingtricks |