Cargando…
A randomized clinical trial comparing intracorpus spongiosum block versus intraurethral lignocaine in visual internal urethrotomy for short segment anterior urethral strictures
OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to compare the effectiveness in pain relief of intracorpus spongiosum block (ICSB) versus intraurethral topical anesthesia (TA) using 2% lignocaine jelly for performing visual internal urethrotomy (VIU) for short segment anterior urethral strictures. MATERIALS A...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4944625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27453654 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.184901 |
_version_ | 1782442796861358080 |
---|---|
author | Biswal, Deepak Kumar Ghosh, Bastab Bera, Malay Kumar Pal, Dilip Kumar |
author_facet | Biswal, Deepak Kumar Ghosh, Bastab Bera, Malay Kumar Pal, Dilip Kumar |
author_sort | Biswal, Deepak Kumar |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to compare the effectiveness in pain relief of intracorpus spongiosum block (ICSB) versus intraurethral topical anesthesia (TA) using 2% lignocaine jelly for performing visual internal urethrotomy (VIU) for short segment anterior urethral strictures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was a randomized, parallel group controlled trial. Participants are adult patients with a single anterior urethral stricture up to 2 cm in length. Patients were allocated to two intervention groups with thirty patients in each group. For anesthesia of the urethra, Group 1 patients received ICSB whereas Group 2 patients received intraurethral TA using 2% lignocaine jelly before VIU. Patient discomfort was assessed with visual analog scale (VAS) during the procedure and 1 h postprocedure. The increase in pulse rate and the change in systolic blood pressure (BP) during the procedure were recorded. The procedure was considered successful if there was absence of symptoms or signs of recurrent stricture and ability to pass freely 18Fr catheter during urethral calibration at last follow-up. RESULTS: From March 2014 to June 2015, sixty patients were randomized into two groups of thirty patients each. The mean (±standard deviation) intraoperative VAS score was 2.8 ± 1.1 in Group 1, which was significantly less (P < 0.05) than the 5.6 ± 1.7 score in Group 2. The mean 1 h postoperative VAS score was also significantly lower in Group 1 patients (1.0 ± 1.0) than in Group 2 patients (3.2 ± 1.5). The change in pulse rate was significantly greater in Group 2 (21.3 ± 10.1 beats/min) than in Group 1 (10.6 ± 4.6 beats/min, P < 0.05). The change in systolic BP was also significantly higher in Group 2 (16.3 ± 8.6 mmHg) than in Group 1 (9.1 ± 4.4 mmHg, P < 0.05). The stricture-free rate at 6-month after VIU in Group 1 and Group 2 patients were 88.5% and 89.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ICSB has better pain control with similar complication and recurrence rate than intraurethral lignocaine jelly alone in VIU. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4944625 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49446252016-07-22 A randomized clinical trial comparing intracorpus spongiosum block versus intraurethral lignocaine in visual internal urethrotomy for short segment anterior urethral strictures Biswal, Deepak Kumar Ghosh, Bastab Bera, Malay Kumar Pal, Dilip Kumar Urol Ann Original Article OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to compare the effectiveness in pain relief of intracorpus spongiosum block (ICSB) versus intraurethral topical anesthesia (TA) using 2% lignocaine jelly for performing visual internal urethrotomy (VIU) for short segment anterior urethral strictures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was a randomized, parallel group controlled trial. Participants are adult patients with a single anterior urethral stricture up to 2 cm in length. Patients were allocated to two intervention groups with thirty patients in each group. For anesthesia of the urethra, Group 1 patients received ICSB whereas Group 2 patients received intraurethral TA using 2% lignocaine jelly before VIU. Patient discomfort was assessed with visual analog scale (VAS) during the procedure and 1 h postprocedure. The increase in pulse rate and the change in systolic blood pressure (BP) during the procedure were recorded. The procedure was considered successful if there was absence of symptoms or signs of recurrent stricture and ability to pass freely 18Fr catheter during urethral calibration at last follow-up. RESULTS: From March 2014 to June 2015, sixty patients were randomized into two groups of thirty patients each. The mean (±standard deviation) intraoperative VAS score was 2.8 ± 1.1 in Group 1, which was significantly less (P < 0.05) than the 5.6 ± 1.7 score in Group 2. The mean 1 h postoperative VAS score was also significantly lower in Group 1 patients (1.0 ± 1.0) than in Group 2 patients (3.2 ± 1.5). The change in pulse rate was significantly greater in Group 2 (21.3 ± 10.1 beats/min) than in Group 1 (10.6 ± 4.6 beats/min, P < 0.05). The change in systolic BP was also significantly higher in Group 2 (16.3 ± 8.6 mmHg) than in Group 1 (9.1 ± 4.4 mmHg, P < 0.05). The stricture-free rate at 6-month after VIU in Group 1 and Group 2 patients were 88.5% and 89.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ICSB has better pain control with similar complication and recurrence rate than intraurethral lignocaine jelly alone in VIU. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4944625/ /pubmed/27453654 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.184901 Text en Copyright: © Urology Annals http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Biswal, Deepak Kumar Ghosh, Bastab Bera, Malay Kumar Pal, Dilip Kumar A randomized clinical trial comparing intracorpus spongiosum block versus intraurethral lignocaine in visual internal urethrotomy for short segment anterior urethral strictures |
title | A randomized clinical trial comparing intracorpus spongiosum block versus intraurethral lignocaine in visual internal urethrotomy for short segment anterior urethral strictures |
title_full | A randomized clinical trial comparing intracorpus spongiosum block versus intraurethral lignocaine in visual internal urethrotomy for short segment anterior urethral strictures |
title_fullStr | A randomized clinical trial comparing intracorpus spongiosum block versus intraurethral lignocaine in visual internal urethrotomy for short segment anterior urethral strictures |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomized clinical trial comparing intracorpus spongiosum block versus intraurethral lignocaine in visual internal urethrotomy for short segment anterior urethral strictures |
title_short | A randomized clinical trial comparing intracorpus spongiosum block versus intraurethral lignocaine in visual internal urethrotomy for short segment anterior urethral strictures |
title_sort | randomized clinical trial comparing intracorpus spongiosum block versus intraurethral lignocaine in visual internal urethrotomy for short segment anterior urethral strictures |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4944625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27453654 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.184901 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT biswaldeepakkumar arandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingintracorpusspongiosumblockversusintraurethrallignocaineinvisualinternalurethrotomyforshortsegmentanteriorurethralstrictures AT ghoshbastab arandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingintracorpusspongiosumblockversusintraurethrallignocaineinvisualinternalurethrotomyforshortsegmentanteriorurethralstrictures AT beramalaykumar arandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingintracorpusspongiosumblockversusintraurethrallignocaineinvisualinternalurethrotomyforshortsegmentanteriorurethralstrictures AT paldilipkumar arandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingintracorpusspongiosumblockversusintraurethrallignocaineinvisualinternalurethrotomyforshortsegmentanteriorurethralstrictures AT biswaldeepakkumar randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingintracorpusspongiosumblockversusintraurethrallignocaineinvisualinternalurethrotomyforshortsegmentanteriorurethralstrictures AT ghoshbastab randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingintracorpusspongiosumblockversusintraurethrallignocaineinvisualinternalurethrotomyforshortsegmentanteriorurethralstrictures AT beramalaykumar randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingintracorpusspongiosumblockversusintraurethrallignocaineinvisualinternalurethrotomyforshortsegmentanteriorurethralstrictures AT paldilipkumar randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingintracorpusspongiosumblockversusintraurethrallignocaineinvisualinternalurethrotomyforshortsegmentanteriorurethralstrictures |