Cargando…

A randomized clinical trial comparing intracorpus spongiosum block versus intraurethral lignocaine in visual internal urethrotomy for short segment anterior urethral strictures

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to compare the effectiveness in pain relief of intracorpus spongiosum block (ICSB) versus intraurethral topical anesthesia (TA) using 2% lignocaine jelly for performing visual internal urethrotomy (VIU) for short segment anterior urethral strictures. MATERIALS A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biswal, Deepak Kumar, Ghosh, Bastab, Bera, Malay Kumar, Pal, Dilip Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4944625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27453654
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.184901
_version_ 1782442796861358080
author Biswal, Deepak Kumar
Ghosh, Bastab
Bera, Malay Kumar
Pal, Dilip Kumar
author_facet Biswal, Deepak Kumar
Ghosh, Bastab
Bera, Malay Kumar
Pal, Dilip Kumar
author_sort Biswal, Deepak Kumar
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to compare the effectiveness in pain relief of intracorpus spongiosum block (ICSB) versus intraurethral topical anesthesia (TA) using 2% lignocaine jelly for performing visual internal urethrotomy (VIU) for short segment anterior urethral strictures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was a randomized, parallel group controlled trial. Participants are adult patients with a single anterior urethral stricture up to 2 cm in length. Patients were allocated to two intervention groups with thirty patients in each group. For anesthesia of the urethra, Group 1 patients received ICSB whereas Group 2 patients received intraurethral TA using 2% lignocaine jelly before VIU. Patient discomfort was assessed with visual analog scale (VAS) during the procedure and 1 h postprocedure. The increase in pulse rate and the change in systolic blood pressure (BP) during the procedure were recorded. The procedure was considered successful if there was absence of symptoms or signs of recurrent stricture and ability to pass freely 18Fr catheter during urethral calibration at last follow-up. RESULTS: From March 2014 to June 2015, sixty patients were randomized into two groups of thirty patients each. The mean (±standard deviation) intraoperative VAS score was 2.8 ± 1.1 in Group 1, which was significantly less (P < 0.05) than the 5.6 ± 1.7 score in Group 2. The mean 1 h postoperative VAS score was also significantly lower in Group 1 patients (1.0 ± 1.0) than in Group 2 patients (3.2 ± 1.5). The change in pulse rate was significantly greater in Group 2 (21.3 ± 10.1 beats/min) than in Group 1 (10.6 ± 4.6 beats/min, P < 0.05). The change in systolic BP was also significantly higher in Group 2 (16.3 ± 8.6 mmHg) than in Group 1 (9.1 ± 4.4 mmHg, P < 0.05). The stricture-free rate at 6-month after VIU in Group 1 and Group 2 patients were 88.5% and 89.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ICSB has better pain control with similar complication and recurrence rate than intraurethral lignocaine jelly alone in VIU.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4944625
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49446252016-07-22 A randomized clinical trial comparing intracorpus spongiosum block versus intraurethral lignocaine in visual internal urethrotomy for short segment anterior urethral strictures Biswal, Deepak Kumar Ghosh, Bastab Bera, Malay Kumar Pal, Dilip Kumar Urol Ann Original Article OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to compare the effectiveness in pain relief of intracorpus spongiosum block (ICSB) versus intraurethral topical anesthesia (TA) using 2% lignocaine jelly for performing visual internal urethrotomy (VIU) for short segment anterior urethral strictures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was a randomized, parallel group controlled trial. Participants are adult patients with a single anterior urethral stricture up to 2 cm in length. Patients were allocated to two intervention groups with thirty patients in each group. For anesthesia of the urethra, Group 1 patients received ICSB whereas Group 2 patients received intraurethral TA using 2% lignocaine jelly before VIU. Patient discomfort was assessed with visual analog scale (VAS) during the procedure and 1 h postprocedure. The increase in pulse rate and the change in systolic blood pressure (BP) during the procedure were recorded. The procedure was considered successful if there was absence of symptoms or signs of recurrent stricture and ability to pass freely 18Fr catheter during urethral calibration at last follow-up. RESULTS: From March 2014 to June 2015, sixty patients were randomized into two groups of thirty patients each. The mean (±standard deviation) intraoperative VAS score was 2.8 ± 1.1 in Group 1, which was significantly less (P < 0.05) than the 5.6 ± 1.7 score in Group 2. The mean 1 h postoperative VAS score was also significantly lower in Group 1 patients (1.0 ± 1.0) than in Group 2 patients (3.2 ± 1.5). The change in pulse rate was significantly greater in Group 2 (21.3 ± 10.1 beats/min) than in Group 1 (10.6 ± 4.6 beats/min, P < 0.05). The change in systolic BP was also significantly higher in Group 2 (16.3 ± 8.6 mmHg) than in Group 1 (9.1 ± 4.4 mmHg, P < 0.05). The stricture-free rate at 6-month after VIU in Group 1 and Group 2 patients were 88.5% and 89.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ICSB has better pain control with similar complication and recurrence rate than intraurethral lignocaine jelly alone in VIU. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4944625/ /pubmed/27453654 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.184901 Text en Copyright: © Urology Annals http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Biswal, Deepak Kumar
Ghosh, Bastab
Bera, Malay Kumar
Pal, Dilip Kumar
A randomized clinical trial comparing intracorpus spongiosum block versus intraurethral lignocaine in visual internal urethrotomy for short segment anterior urethral strictures
title A randomized clinical trial comparing intracorpus spongiosum block versus intraurethral lignocaine in visual internal urethrotomy for short segment anterior urethral strictures
title_full A randomized clinical trial comparing intracorpus spongiosum block versus intraurethral lignocaine in visual internal urethrotomy for short segment anterior urethral strictures
title_fullStr A randomized clinical trial comparing intracorpus spongiosum block versus intraurethral lignocaine in visual internal urethrotomy for short segment anterior urethral strictures
title_full_unstemmed A randomized clinical trial comparing intracorpus spongiosum block versus intraurethral lignocaine in visual internal urethrotomy for short segment anterior urethral strictures
title_short A randomized clinical trial comparing intracorpus spongiosum block versus intraurethral lignocaine in visual internal urethrotomy for short segment anterior urethral strictures
title_sort randomized clinical trial comparing intracorpus spongiosum block versus intraurethral lignocaine in visual internal urethrotomy for short segment anterior urethral strictures
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4944625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27453654
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.184901
work_keys_str_mv AT biswaldeepakkumar arandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingintracorpusspongiosumblockversusintraurethrallignocaineinvisualinternalurethrotomyforshortsegmentanteriorurethralstrictures
AT ghoshbastab arandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingintracorpusspongiosumblockversusintraurethrallignocaineinvisualinternalurethrotomyforshortsegmentanteriorurethralstrictures
AT beramalaykumar arandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingintracorpusspongiosumblockversusintraurethrallignocaineinvisualinternalurethrotomyforshortsegmentanteriorurethralstrictures
AT paldilipkumar arandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingintracorpusspongiosumblockversusintraurethrallignocaineinvisualinternalurethrotomyforshortsegmentanteriorurethralstrictures
AT biswaldeepakkumar randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingintracorpusspongiosumblockversusintraurethrallignocaineinvisualinternalurethrotomyforshortsegmentanteriorurethralstrictures
AT ghoshbastab randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingintracorpusspongiosumblockversusintraurethrallignocaineinvisualinternalurethrotomyforshortsegmentanteriorurethralstrictures
AT beramalaykumar randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingintracorpusspongiosumblockversusintraurethrallignocaineinvisualinternalurethrotomyforshortsegmentanteriorurethralstrictures
AT paldilipkumar randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingintracorpusspongiosumblockversusintraurethrallignocaineinvisualinternalurethrotomyforshortsegmentanteriorurethralstrictures