Cargando…

Shutting Down Sensorimotor Interferences after Stroke: A Proof-of-Principle SMR Neurofeedback Study

Introduction: Neurofeedback training aims at learning self-regulation of brain activity underlying cognitive, emotional or physiological functions. Despite of promising investigations on neurofeedback as a tool for cognitive rehabilitation in neurological diseases, such as after stroke, there is sti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reichert, Johanna L., Kober, Silvia E., Schweiger, Daniela, Grieshofer, Peter, Neuper, Christa, Wood, Guilherme
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4945651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27471456
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00348
_version_ 1782442902968860672
author Reichert, Johanna L.
Kober, Silvia E.
Schweiger, Daniela
Grieshofer, Peter
Neuper, Christa
Wood, Guilherme
author_facet Reichert, Johanna L.
Kober, Silvia E.
Schweiger, Daniela
Grieshofer, Peter
Neuper, Christa
Wood, Guilherme
author_sort Reichert, Johanna L.
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Neurofeedback training aims at learning self-regulation of brain activity underlying cognitive, emotional or physiological functions. Despite of promising investigations on neurofeedback as a tool for cognitive rehabilitation in neurological diseases, such as after stroke, there is still a lack of research on feasibility and efficiency of neurofeedback in this field. Methods: The present study aimed at investigating behavioral and electrophysiological effects of 10 sessions of sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) neurofeedback in a 74-years-old stroke patient (UG20). Based on previous results in healthy young participants, we hypothesized that SMR neurofeedback leads to a decrease in sensorimotor interferences and improved stimulus processing, reflected by changes in event-related potentials (ERPs) and electrophysiological coherence. To assess whether UG20 benefited from the training as much as healthy persons of a similar age, a healthy control group of N = 10 elderly persons was trained as well. Before and after neurofeedback training, participants took part in a multichannel electroencephalography measurement conducted during a non-verbal and a verbal learning task. Results: Both UG20 and the healthy controls were able to regulate their SMR activity during neurofeedback training. Moreover, in a non-verbal learning task, changes in ERPs and coherence were observed after training: UG20 showed a better performance in the non-verbal learning task and a higher P3 amplitude after training than before, and coherence between central and parietal electrodes decreased after training. The control group also showed a behavioral improvement in the non-verbal learning task and tendencies for higher P3 amplitudes and decreased central-parietal coherence after training. Single-case analyses indicated that the changes observed in UG20 were not smaller than the changes in healthy controls. Conclusion: Neurofeedback can be successfully applied in a stroke patient and in healthy elderly persons. We suggest that SMR neurofeedback leads to a shutting-down of sensorimotor interferences which benefits semantic encoding and retrieval.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4945651
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49456512016-07-28 Shutting Down Sensorimotor Interferences after Stroke: A Proof-of-Principle SMR Neurofeedback Study Reichert, Johanna L. Kober, Silvia E. Schweiger, Daniela Grieshofer, Peter Neuper, Christa Wood, Guilherme Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Introduction: Neurofeedback training aims at learning self-regulation of brain activity underlying cognitive, emotional or physiological functions. Despite of promising investigations on neurofeedback as a tool for cognitive rehabilitation in neurological diseases, such as after stroke, there is still a lack of research on feasibility and efficiency of neurofeedback in this field. Methods: The present study aimed at investigating behavioral and electrophysiological effects of 10 sessions of sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) neurofeedback in a 74-years-old stroke patient (UG20). Based on previous results in healthy young participants, we hypothesized that SMR neurofeedback leads to a decrease in sensorimotor interferences and improved stimulus processing, reflected by changes in event-related potentials (ERPs) and electrophysiological coherence. To assess whether UG20 benefited from the training as much as healthy persons of a similar age, a healthy control group of N = 10 elderly persons was trained as well. Before and after neurofeedback training, participants took part in a multichannel electroencephalography measurement conducted during a non-verbal and a verbal learning task. Results: Both UG20 and the healthy controls were able to regulate their SMR activity during neurofeedback training. Moreover, in a non-verbal learning task, changes in ERPs and coherence were observed after training: UG20 showed a better performance in the non-verbal learning task and a higher P3 amplitude after training than before, and coherence between central and parietal electrodes decreased after training. The control group also showed a behavioral improvement in the non-verbal learning task and tendencies for higher P3 amplitudes and decreased central-parietal coherence after training. Single-case analyses indicated that the changes observed in UG20 were not smaller than the changes in healthy controls. Conclusion: Neurofeedback can be successfully applied in a stroke patient and in healthy elderly persons. We suggest that SMR neurofeedback leads to a shutting-down of sensorimotor interferences which benefits semantic encoding and retrieval. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4945651/ /pubmed/27471456 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00348 Text en Copyright © 2016 Reichert, Kober, Schweiger, Grieshofer, Neuper and Wood. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Reichert, Johanna L.
Kober, Silvia E.
Schweiger, Daniela
Grieshofer, Peter
Neuper, Christa
Wood, Guilherme
Shutting Down Sensorimotor Interferences after Stroke: A Proof-of-Principle SMR Neurofeedback Study
title Shutting Down Sensorimotor Interferences after Stroke: A Proof-of-Principle SMR Neurofeedback Study
title_full Shutting Down Sensorimotor Interferences after Stroke: A Proof-of-Principle SMR Neurofeedback Study
title_fullStr Shutting Down Sensorimotor Interferences after Stroke: A Proof-of-Principle SMR Neurofeedback Study
title_full_unstemmed Shutting Down Sensorimotor Interferences after Stroke: A Proof-of-Principle SMR Neurofeedback Study
title_short Shutting Down Sensorimotor Interferences after Stroke: A Proof-of-Principle SMR Neurofeedback Study
title_sort shutting down sensorimotor interferences after stroke: a proof-of-principle smr neurofeedback study
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4945651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27471456
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00348
work_keys_str_mv AT reichertjohannal shuttingdownsensorimotorinterferencesafterstrokeaproofofprinciplesmrneurofeedbackstudy
AT kobersilviae shuttingdownsensorimotorinterferencesafterstrokeaproofofprinciplesmrneurofeedbackstudy
AT schweigerdaniela shuttingdownsensorimotorinterferencesafterstrokeaproofofprinciplesmrneurofeedbackstudy
AT grieshoferpeter shuttingdownsensorimotorinterferencesafterstrokeaproofofprinciplesmrneurofeedbackstudy
AT neuperchrista shuttingdownsensorimotorinterferencesafterstrokeaproofofprinciplesmrneurofeedbackstudy
AT woodguilherme shuttingdownsensorimotorinterferencesafterstrokeaproofofprinciplesmrneurofeedbackstudy