Cargando…

Patient-reported outcome measures for cancer caregivers: a systematic review

PURPOSE: Informal caregivers provide invaluable help and support to people with cancer. As treatments extend survival and the potential burdens on carers increase, there is a need to assess the impact of the role. This systematic review identified instruments that measure the impact of caregiving, e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shilling, Valerie, Matthews, Lucy, Jenkins, Valerie, Fallowfield, Lesley
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4945691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26872911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1239-0
_version_ 1782442908250537984
author Shilling, Valerie
Matthews, Lucy
Jenkins, Valerie
Fallowfield, Lesley
author_facet Shilling, Valerie
Matthews, Lucy
Jenkins, Valerie
Fallowfield, Lesley
author_sort Shilling, Valerie
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Informal caregivers provide invaluable help and support to people with cancer. As treatments extend survival and the potential burdens on carers increase, there is a need to assess the impact of the role. This systematic review identified instruments that measure the impact of caregiving, evaluated their psychometric performance specifically in cancer and appraised the content. METHODS: A two-stage search strategy was employed to: (1) identify instruments that measure the impact of caregiving, and (2) run individual searches on each measure to identify publications evaluating psychometric performance in the target population. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO and restricted to English for instrument used and article language. Psychometric performance was evaluated for content and construct validity, internal consistency, test–retest reliability, precision, responsiveness and acceptability. Individual scale items were extracted and systematically categorised into conceptual domains. RESULTS: Ten papers were included reporting on the psychometric properties of eight measures. Although construct validity and internal consistency were most frequently evaluated, no study comprehensively evaluated all relevant properties. Few studies met our inclusion criteria so it was not possible to consider the psychometric performance of the measures across a group of studies. Content analysis resulted in 16 domains with 5 overarching themes: lifestyle disruption; well-being; health of the caregiver; managing the situation and relationships. CONCLUSIONS: Few measures of caregiver impact have been subject to psychometric evaluation in cancer caregivers. Those that have do not capture well changes in roles and responsibilities within the family and career, indicating the need for a new instrument. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11136-016-1239-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4945691
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49456912016-07-26 Patient-reported outcome measures for cancer caregivers: a systematic review Shilling, Valerie Matthews, Lucy Jenkins, Valerie Fallowfield, Lesley Qual Life Res Review PURPOSE: Informal caregivers provide invaluable help and support to people with cancer. As treatments extend survival and the potential burdens on carers increase, there is a need to assess the impact of the role. This systematic review identified instruments that measure the impact of caregiving, evaluated their psychometric performance specifically in cancer and appraised the content. METHODS: A two-stage search strategy was employed to: (1) identify instruments that measure the impact of caregiving, and (2) run individual searches on each measure to identify publications evaluating psychometric performance in the target population. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO and restricted to English for instrument used and article language. Psychometric performance was evaluated for content and construct validity, internal consistency, test–retest reliability, precision, responsiveness and acceptability. Individual scale items were extracted and systematically categorised into conceptual domains. RESULTS: Ten papers were included reporting on the psychometric properties of eight measures. Although construct validity and internal consistency were most frequently evaluated, no study comprehensively evaluated all relevant properties. Few studies met our inclusion criteria so it was not possible to consider the psychometric performance of the measures across a group of studies. Content analysis resulted in 16 domains with 5 overarching themes: lifestyle disruption; well-being; health of the caregiver; managing the situation and relationships. CONCLUSIONS: Few measures of caregiver impact have been subject to psychometric evaluation in cancer caregivers. Those that have do not capture well changes in roles and responsibilities within the family and career, indicating the need for a new instrument. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11136-016-1239-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2016-02-12 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4945691/ /pubmed/26872911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1239-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Shilling, Valerie
Matthews, Lucy
Jenkins, Valerie
Fallowfield, Lesley
Patient-reported outcome measures for cancer caregivers: a systematic review
title Patient-reported outcome measures for cancer caregivers: a systematic review
title_full Patient-reported outcome measures for cancer caregivers: a systematic review
title_fullStr Patient-reported outcome measures for cancer caregivers: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Patient-reported outcome measures for cancer caregivers: a systematic review
title_short Patient-reported outcome measures for cancer caregivers: a systematic review
title_sort patient-reported outcome measures for cancer caregivers: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4945691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26872911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1239-0
work_keys_str_mv AT shillingvalerie patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforcancercaregiversasystematicreview
AT matthewslucy patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforcancercaregiversasystematicreview
AT jenkinsvalerie patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforcancercaregiversasystematicreview
AT fallowfieldlesley patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforcancercaregiversasystematicreview