Cargando…
Efficacy of adding a supporting implant in stress distribution of long-span fixed partial dentures: a 3D finite element analysis
Background. Long span is seen in many clinical situations. Treatmentplanning options of these cases are difficult and may require FPD, RPD or ISP. Each option has its own disadvantages, including mechanical problems, patient comfort and cost. This article will evaluate the stress distribution of a d...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4946000/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27429723 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2016.013 |
_version_ | 1782442957861814272 |
---|---|
author | Shurbaji Mozayek, Rami Allaf, Mirza B. Abuharb, Mohammad |
author_facet | Shurbaji Mozayek, Rami Allaf, Mirza B. Abuharb, Mohammad |
author_sort | Shurbaji Mozayek, Rami |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. Long span is seen in many clinical situations. Treatmentplanning options of these cases are difficult and may require FPD, RPD or ISP. Each option has its own disadvantages, including mechanical problems, patient comfort and cost. This article will evaluate the stress distribution of a different treatment option, which consists of adding a single sup-porting implant to the FPD by using 3D finite element analysis. Methods. Three models, each consisting of 5 units, were created as follows: 1. Tooth Pontic Pontic Pontic Tooth; 2. Tooth Pontic Implant Pontic Tooth; 3. Tooth Pontic Pontic Implant Tooth. An axial force was applied to the prostheses by using 3D finite element method and stresses were evaluated. Results. The maximum stress was found in the prostheses in all the models; the highest stress values in all the shared components of the models were almost similar. Stress in implants was lower in the second model than the third one. Conclusion. Adding a supporting implant in long-span FPD has no advantages while it has the disadvantages of complicating treatment and the complications that may occur to the implant and surrounding bone. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4946000 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Tabriz University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49460002016-07-15 Efficacy of adding a supporting implant in stress distribution of long-span fixed partial dentures: a 3D finite element analysis Shurbaji Mozayek, Rami Allaf, Mirza B. Abuharb, Mohammad J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects Original Article Background. Long span is seen in many clinical situations. Treatmentplanning options of these cases are difficult and may require FPD, RPD or ISP. Each option has its own disadvantages, including mechanical problems, patient comfort and cost. This article will evaluate the stress distribution of a different treatment option, which consists of adding a single sup-porting implant to the FPD by using 3D finite element analysis. Methods. Three models, each consisting of 5 units, were created as follows: 1. Tooth Pontic Pontic Pontic Tooth; 2. Tooth Pontic Implant Pontic Tooth; 3. Tooth Pontic Pontic Implant Tooth. An axial force was applied to the prostheses by using 3D finite element method and stresses were evaluated. Results. The maximum stress was found in the prostheses in all the models; the highest stress values in all the shared components of the models were almost similar. Stress in implants was lower in the second model than the third one. Conclusion. Adding a supporting implant in long-span FPD has no advantages while it has the disadvantages of complicating treatment and the complications that may occur to the implant and surrounding bone. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2016 2016-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4946000/ /pubmed/27429723 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2016.013 Text en © 2016 Mozayek et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article published and distributed by Tabriz University of Medical Sciences under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Shurbaji Mozayek, Rami Allaf, Mirza B. Abuharb, Mohammad Efficacy of adding a supporting implant in stress distribution of long-span fixed partial dentures: a 3D finite element analysis |
title | Efficacy of adding a supporting implant in stress distribution of long-span fixed partial dentures: a 3D finite element analysis |
title_full | Efficacy of adding a supporting implant in stress distribution of long-span fixed partial dentures: a 3D finite element analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of adding a supporting implant in stress distribution of long-span fixed partial dentures: a 3D finite element analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of adding a supporting implant in stress distribution of long-span fixed partial dentures: a 3D finite element analysis |
title_short | Efficacy of adding a supporting implant in stress distribution of long-span fixed partial dentures: a 3D finite element analysis |
title_sort | efficacy of adding a supporting implant in stress distribution of long-span fixed partial dentures: a 3d finite element analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4946000/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27429723 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2016.013 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shurbajimozayekrami efficacyofaddingasupportingimplantinstressdistributionoflongspanfixedpartialdenturesa3dfiniteelementanalysis AT allafmirza efficacyofaddingasupportingimplantinstressdistributionoflongspanfixedpartialdenturesa3dfiniteelementanalysis AT babuharbmohammad efficacyofaddingasupportingimplantinstressdistributionoflongspanfixedpartialdenturesa3dfiniteelementanalysis |