Cargando…

Thromboprophylaxis prescribing among junior doctors: the impact of educational interventions

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in an important aspect of the care of hospitalised patients, for which the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has issued guidance. Guidance compliance continues to be a concern. Junior doctors are the main group responsible f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Watt, Bethany J., Williams, Dean T., Lewis, Lauren, Whitaker, Christopher J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4946149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27422660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1480-9
_version_ 1782442976931217408
author Watt, Bethany J.
Williams, Dean T.
Lewis, Lauren
Whitaker, Christopher J.
author_facet Watt, Bethany J.
Williams, Dean T.
Lewis, Lauren
Whitaker, Christopher J.
author_sort Watt, Bethany J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in an important aspect of the care of hospitalised patients, for which the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has issued guidance. Guidance compliance continues to be a concern. Junior doctors are the main group responsible for prescribing thromboprophylaxis. We aimed to compare local pharmacological thromboprophylaxis prescribing against NICE guidelines in a surgical department at a district general hospital, and determine whether interventions aimed at improving compliance were effective. METHODS: Over four months, a two cycle audit of prescribing patterns for VTE prophylaxis was performed using data collected at four intervals: 1. Baseline 2. Following pro-forma introduction and feedback 3. A second baseline data collection. 4. Following VTE prophylaxis teaching. RESULTS: A total of 394 admissions were included. Correct identification and prescribing for at-risk patients ranged between 76 and 93 %, whilst risk assessment documentation and explanation to patients occurred in fewer than 50 and 66 % respectively. Prescribing and risk assessment improved in the first cycle (chi2 = 6.75, p = 0.009 and chi2 = 10.70, p = 0.001 respectively), a consequence of one specialty improving following additional feedback. Teaching was not associated with improvements. Overall compliance with NICE guidelines was achieved in no more than 25 % of admissions. CONCLUSIONS: Despite junior doctors generally prescribing VTE thromboprophylaxis appropriately, overall compliance with guidelines remained poor regardless of educational interventions. Verbal feedback was the only intervention associated with modest improvements. A pressurised work environment may limit the impact of educational interventions. Guidance simplification or devolving responsibility to other members of staff may improve compliance. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1480-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4946149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49461492016-07-16 Thromboprophylaxis prescribing among junior doctors: the impact of educational interventions Watt, Bethany J. Williams, Dean T. Lewis, Lauren Whitaker, Christopher J. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in an important aspect of the care of hospitalised patients, for which the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has issued guidance. Guidance compliance continues to be a concern. Junior doctors are the main group responsible for prescribing thromboprophylaxis. We aimed to compare local pharmacological thromboprophylaxis prescribing against NICE guidelines in a surgical department at a district general hospital, and determine whether interventions aimed at improving compliance were effective. METHODS: Over four months, a two cycle audit of prescribing patterns for VTE prophylaxis was performed using data collected at four intervals: 1. Baseline 2. Following pro-forma introduction and feedback 3. A second baseline data collection. 4. Following VTE prophylaxis teaching. RESULTS: A total of 394 admissions were included. Correct identification and prescribing for at-risk patients ranged between 76 and 93 %, whilst risk assessment documentation and explanation to patients occurred in fewer than 50 and 66 % respectively. Prescribing and risk assessment improved in the first cycle (chi2 = 6.75, p = 0.009 and chi2 = 10.70, p = 0.001 respectively), a consequence of one specialty improving following additional feedback. Teaching was not associated with improvements. Overall compliance with NICE guidelines was achieved in no more than 25 % of admissions. CONCLUSIONS: Despite junior doctors generally prescribing VTE thromboprophylaxis appropriately, overall compliance with guidelines remained poor regardless of educational interventions. Verbal feedback was the only intervention associated with modest improvements. A pressurised work environment may limit the impact of educational interventions. Guidance simplification or devolving responsibility to other members of staff may improve compliance. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1480-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4946149/ /pubmed/27422660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1480-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Watt, Bethany J.
Williams, Dean T.
Lewis, Lauren
Whitaker, Christopher J.
Thromboprophylaxis prescribing among junior doctors: the impact of educational interventions
title Thromboprophylaxis prescribing among junior doctors: the impact of educational interventions
title_full Thromboprophylaxis prescribing among junior doctors: the impact of educational interventions
title_fullStr Thromboprophylaxis prescribing among junior doctors: the impact of educational interventions
title_full_unstemmed Thromboprophylaxis prescribing among junior doctors: the impact of educational interventions
title_short Thromboprophylaxis prescribing among junior doctors: the impact of educational interventions
title_sort thromboprophylaxis prescribing among junior doctors: the impact of educational interventions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4946149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27422660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1480-9
work_keys_str_mv AT wattbethanyj thromboprophylaxisprescribingamongjuniordoctorstheimpactofeducationalinterventions
AT williamsdeant thromboprophylaxisprescribingamongjuniordoctorstheimpactofeducationalinterventions
AT lewislauren thromboprophylaxisprescribingamongjuniordoctorstheimpactofeducationalinterventions
AT whitakerchristopherj thromboprophylaxisprescribingamongjuniordoctorstheimpactofeducationalinterventions