Cargando…

Psychometric properties of the Dutch WHOQOL-OLD

BACKGROUND: To assess the internal consistency reliability and construct validity of the Dutch version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument-Older Adults Module (WHOQOL-OLD). METHODS: The psychometric properties of the Dutch WHOQOL-OLD were examined in a cross-sectional study u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gobbens, Robbert J. J., van Assen, Marcel A. L. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4946232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27416861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0508-5
_version_ 1782442992689217536
author Gobbens, Robbert J. J.
van Assen, Marcel A. L. M.
author_facet Gobbens, Robbert J. J.
van Assen, Marcel A. L. M.
author_sort Gobbens, Robbert J. J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To assess the internal consistency reliability and construct validity of the Dutch version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument-Older Adults Module (WHOQOL-OLD). METHODS: The psychometric properties of the Dutch WHOQOL-OLD were examined in a cross-sectional study using a sample of 1,340 people aged 60 years or older. Participants completed a Web-based questionnaire, the ‘Senioren Barometer’. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha and corrected item-total correlations. Construct validity of the Dutch WHOQOL-OLD was evaluated with confirmatory factor analyses, and correlations within and between scales, using scales WHOQOL-BREF, Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI), and the Emotional and Social Loneliness Scale (ESLS). RESULTS: The reliabilities of the six WHOQOL-OLD facets or subscales were sufficient to good (.66-.91). The convergent validity of the WHOQOL-OLD was good, whereas our findings on the divergent validity of the WHOQOL-OLD were somewhat mixed. Findings corroborating the divergent validity were that the 6-factor model fitted better than the second-order factor model, and WHOQOL-OLD facets sensory abilities, past, present and future activities, death and dying, intimacy correlated more strongly with similar than dissimilar scales. Not fully supporting divergent validity were the extremely high correlations between the factors corresponding to autonomy, past, present and future activities, and social participation. CONCLUSION: We offer Dutch healthcare and social workers an instrument with good psychometric properties for measuring quality of life in older people. Further research on interrelations between WHOQOL-OLD facets is recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4946232
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49462322016-07-16 Psychometric properties of the Dutch WHOQOL-OLD Gobbens, Robbert J. J. van Assen, Marcel A. L. M. Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: To assess the internal consistency reliability and construct validity of the Dutch version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument-Older Adults Module (WHOQOL-OLD). METHODS: The psychometric properties of the Dutch WHOQOL-OLD were examined in a cross-sectional study using a sample of 1,340 people aged 60 years or older. Participants completed a Web-based questionnaire, the ‘Senioren Barometer’. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha and corrected item-total correlations. Construct validity of the Dutch WHOQOL-OLD was evaluated with confirmatory factor analyses, and correlations within and between scales, using scales WHOQOL-BREF, Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI), and the Emotional and Social Loneliness Scale (ESLS). RESULTS: The reliabilities of the six WHOQOL-OLD facets or subscales were sufficient to good (.66-.91). The convergent validity of the WHOQOL-OLD was good, whereas our findings on the divergent validity of the WHOQOL-OLD were somewhat mixed. Findings corroborating the divergent validity were that the 6-factor model fitted better than the second-order factor model, and WHOQOL-OLD facets sensory abilities, past, present and future activities, death and dying, intimacy correlated more strongly with similar than dissimilar scales. Not fully supporting divergent validity were the extremely high correlations between the factors corresponding to autonomy, past, present and future activities, and social participation. CONCLUSION: We offer Dutch healthcare and social workers an instrument with good psychometric properties for measuring quality of life in older people. Further research on interrelations between WHOQOL-OLD facets is recommended. BioMed Central 2016-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4946232/ /pubmed/27416861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0508-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Gobbens, Robbert J. J.
van Assen, Marcel A. L. M.
Psychometric properties of the Dutch WHOQOL-OLD
title Psychometric properties of the Dutch WHOQOL-OLD
title_full Psychometric properties of the Dutch WHOQOL-OLD
title_fullStr Psychometric properties of the Dutch WHOQOL-OLD
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric properties of the Dutch WHOQOL-OLD
title_short Psychometric properties of the Dutch WHOQOL-OLD
title_sort psychometric properties of the dutch whoqol-old
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4946232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27416861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0508-5
work_keys_str_mv AT gobbensrobbertjj psychometricpropertiesofthedutchwhoqolold
AT vanassenmarcelalm psychometricpropertiesofthedutchwhoqolold