Cargando…

Cisplatin, Gemcitabine, and Lapatinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

PURPOSE: We sought to investigate the safety and efficacy of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and lapatinib (GCL) as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) planned for radical cystectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four cycles of GCL were administered as neoadjuvant therapy fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Narayan, Vivek, Mamtani, Ronac, Keefe, Stephen, Guzzo, Thomas, Malkowicz, S. Bruce, Vaughn, David J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Cancer Association 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4946374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26639198
http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.405
_version_ 1782443016924954624
author Narayan, Vivek
Mamtani, Ronac
Keefe, Stephen
Guzzo, Thomas
Malkowicz, S. Bruce
Vaughn, David J.
author_facet Narayan, Vivek
Mamtani, Ronac
Keefe, Stephen
Guzzo, Thomas
Malkowicz, S. Bruce
Vaughn, David J.
author_sort Narayan, Vivek
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We sought to investigate the safety and efficacy of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and lapatinib (GCL) as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) planned for radical cystectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four cycles of GCL were administered as neoadjuvant therapy for patients with MIBC. Although initially designed as a phase II efficacy study with a primary endpoint of pathologic complete response at the time of radical cystectomy, the dose selected for investigation proved excessively toxic. A total of six patients were enrolled. RESULTS: The initial four patients received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) intravenously on day 1 of each 21-day treatment cycle. Lapatinib was administered as 1,000 mg orally daily starting one week prior to the initiation of cycle 1 of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) and continuing until the completion of cycle 4 of GC. These initial doses were poorly tolerated, and the final two enrolled patients received a reduced lapatinib dose of 750 mg orally daily. However, reduction of the lapatinib dose did not result in improved tolerance or drug-delivery, and the trial was terminated early due to excessive toxicity. Grade 3/4 toxicities included diarrhea (33%), nausea/vomiting (33%), and thrombocytopenia (33%). CONCLUSION: The addition of lapatinib to GC as neoadjuvant therapy for MIBC was limited by excessive treatment-related toxicity. These findings highlight the importance of thorough dose-escalation investigation of combination therapies prior to evaluation in the neoadjuvant setting, as well as the limitations of determination of maximum tolerated dose for novel targeted combination regimens.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4946374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Korean Cancer Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49463742016-07-18 Cisplatin, Gemcitabine, and Lapatinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Narayan, Vivek Mamtani, Ronac Keefe, Stephen Guzzo, Thomas Malkowicz, S. Bruce Vaughn, David J. Cancer Res Treat Original Article PURPOSE: We sought to investigate the safety and efficacy of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and lapatinib (GCL) as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) planned for radical cystectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four cycles of GCL were administered as neoadjuvant therapy for patients with MIBC. Although initially designed as a phase II efficacy study with a primary endpoint of pathologic complete response at the time of radical cystectomy, the dose selected for investigation proved excessively toxic. A total of six patients were enrolled. RESULTS: The initial four patients received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) intravenously on day 1 of each 21-day treatment cycle. Lapatinib was administered as 1,000 mg orally daily starting one week prior to the initiation of cycle 1 of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) and continuing until the completion of cycle 4 of GC. These initial doses were poorly tolerated, and the final two enrolled patients received a reduced lapatinib dose of 750 mg orally daily. However, reduction of the lapatinib dose did not result in improved tolerance or drug-delivery, and the trial was terminated early due to excessive toxicity. Grade 3/4 toxicities included diarrhea (33%), nausea/vomiting (33%), and thrombocytopenia (33%). CONCLUSION: The addition of lapatinib to GC as neoadjuvant therapy for MIBC was limited by excessive treatment-related toxicity. These findings highlight the importance of thorough dose-escalation investigation of combination therapies prior to evaluation in the neoadjuvant setting, as well as the limitations of determination of maximum tolerated dose for novel targeted combination regimens. Korean Cancer Association 2016-07 2015-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4946374/ /pubmed/26639198 http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.405 Text en Copyright © 2016 by the Korean Cancer Association This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Narayan, Vivek
Mamtani, Ronac
Keefe, Stephen
Guzzo, Thomas
Malkowicz, S. Bruce
Vaughn, David J.
Cisplatin, Gemcitabine, and Lapatinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
title Cisplatin, Gemcitabine, and Lapatinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
title_full Cisplatin, Gemcitabine, and Lapatinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
title_fullStr Cisplatin, Gemcitabine, and Lapatinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Cisplatin, Gemcitabine, and Lapatinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
title_short Cisplatin, Gemcitabine, and Lapatinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
title_sort cisplatin, gemcitabine, and lapatinib as neoadjuvant therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4946374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26639198
http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.405
work_keys_str_mv AT narayanvivek cisplatingemcitabineandlapatinibasneoadjuvanttherapyformuscleinvasivebladdercancer
AT mamtanironac cisplatingemcitabineandlapatinibasneoadjuvanttherapyformuscleinvasivebladdercancer
AT keefestephen cisplatingemcitabineandlapatinibasneoadjuvanttherapyformuscleinvasivebladdercancer
AT guzzothomas cisplatingemcitabineandlapatinibasneoadjuvanttherapyformuscleinvasivebladdercancer
AT malkowiczsbruce cisplatingemcitabineandlapatinibasneoadjuvanttherapyformuscleinvasivebladdercancer
AT vaughndavidj cisplatingemcitabineandlapatinibasneoadjuvanttherapyformuscleinvasivebladdercancer