Cargando…
The efficacy of tenofovir-based therapy in patients showing suboptimal response to entecavir-adefovir combination therapy
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Before tenofovir (TDF) become available in South Korea, combination therapy with entecavir (ETV) and adefovir (ADV) was the most potent regimen for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who fail to respond to rescue therapy for drug resistance. We analyzed the efficacy of ETV-ADV combi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Association for the Study of the Liver
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4946405/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27304549 http://dx.doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2015.0053 |
_version_ | 1782443023116795904 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Jeong Han Ahn, Sung Hyun Ko, Soon Young Choe, Won Hyeok Kim, Kyun-Hwan Kwon, So Young |
author_facet | Kim, Jeong Han Ahn, Sung Hyun Ko, Soon Young Choe, Won Hyeok Kim, Kyun-Hwan Kwon, So Young |
author_sort | Kim, Jeong Han |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: Before tenofovir (TDF) become available in South Korea, combination therapy with entecavir (ETV) and adefovir (ADV) was the most potent regimen for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who fail to respond to rescue therapy for drug resistance. We analyzed the efficacy of ETV-ADV combination therapy and investigated the clinical and clonal results of TDF-based rescue therapy in CHB patients refractory to this combination. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of CHB patients treated for up to 3 years with ETV-ADV combination therapy as a rescue therapy for drug resistance. In cases refractory to this combination, clinical and clonal analyses were performed for TDF-based rescue therapy. RESULTS: The analysis was performed on 48 patients. Twelve patients achieved a virological response (VR) within 3 years. A VR was subsequently achieved in nine of the ten patients without a VR who switched to TDF monotherapy. A VR was also achieved in six of the seven patients who switched to lamivudine-TDF combination therapy, and in two of the two patients who switched to ETV-TDF combination therapy. In an in vitro susceptibility test, viral replication was detected with TDF monotherapy but not with ETV-TDF combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of ETV-ADV combination therapy was insufficient in CHB patients who were refractory to rescue therapy. A more potent regimen such as ETV-TDF combination therapy may be considered in such refractory cases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4946405 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | The Korean Association for the Study of the Liver |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49464052016-07-18 The efficacy of tenofovir-based therapy in patients showing suboptimal response to entecavir-adefovir combination therapy Kim, Jeong Han Ahn, Sung Hyun Ko, Soon Young Choe, Won Hyeok Kim, Kyun-Hwan Kwon, So Young Clin Mol Hepatol Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Before tenofovir (TDF) become available in South Korea, combination therapy with entecavir (ETV) and adefovir (ADV) was the most potent regimen for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who fail to respond to rescue therapy for drug resistance. We analyzed the efficacy of ETV-ADV combination therapy and investigated the clinical and clonal results of TDF-based rescue therapy in CHB patients refractory to this combination. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of CHB patients treated for up to 3 years with ETV-ADV combination therapy as a rescue therapy for drug resistance. In cases refractory to this combination, clinical and clonal analyses were performed for TDF-based rescue therapy. RESULTS: The analysis was performed on 48 patients. Twelve patients achieved a virological response (VR) within 3 years. A VR was subsequently achieved in nine of the ten patients without a VR who switched to TDF monotherapy. A VR was also achieved in six of the seven patients who switched to lamivudine-TDF combination therapy, and in two of the two patients who switched to ETV-TDF combination therapy. In an in vitro susceptibility test, viral replication was detected with TDF monotherapy but not with ETV-TDF combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of ETV-ADV combination therapy was insufficient in CHB patients who were refractory to rescue therapy. A more potent regimen such as ETV-TDF combination therapy may be considered in such refractory cases. The Korean Association for the Study of the Liver 2016-06 2016-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4946405/ /pubmed/27304549 http://dx.doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2015.0053 Text en Copyright © 2016 by The Korean Association for the Study of the Liver This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kim, Jeong Han Ahn, Sung Hyun Ko, Soon Young Choe, Won Hyeok Kim, Kyun-Hwan Kwon, So Young The efficacy of tenofovir-based therapy in patients showing suboptimal response to entecavir-adefovir combination therapy |
title | The efficacy of tenofovir-based therapy in patients showing suboptimal response to entecavir-adefovir combination therapy |
title_full | The efficacy of tenofovir-based therapy in patients showing suboptimal response to entecavir-adefovir combination therapy |
title_fullStr | The efficacy of tenofovir-based therapy in patients showing suboptimal response to entecavir-adefovir combination therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | The efficacy of tenofovir-based therapy in patients showing suboptimal response to entecavir-adefovir combination therapy |
title_short | The efficacy of tenofovir-based therapy in patients showing suboptimal response to entecavir-adefovir combination therapy |
title_sort | efficacy of tenofovir-based therapy in patients showing suboptimal response to entecavir-adefovir combination therapy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4946405/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27304549 http://dx.doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2015.0053 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimjeonghan theefficacyoftenofovirbasedtherapyinpatientsshowingsuboptimalresponsetoentecaviradefovircombinationtherapy AT ahnsunghyun theefficacyoftenofovirbasedtherapyinpatientsshowingsuboptimalresponsetoentecaviradefovircombinationtherapy AT kosoonyoung theefficacyoftenofovirbasedtherapyinpatientsshowingsuboptimalresponsetoentecaviradefovircombinationtherapy AT choewonhyeok theefficacyoftenofovirbasedtherapyinpatientsshowingsuboptimalresponsetoentecaviradefovircombinationtherapy AT kimkyunhwan theefficacyoftenofovirbasedtherapyinpatientsshowingsuboptimalresponsetoentecaviradefovircombinationtherapy AT kwonsoyoung theefficacyoftenofovirbasedtherapyinpatientsshowingsuboptimalresponsetoentecaviradefovircombinationtherapy AT kimjeonghan efficacyoftenofovirbasedtherapyinpatientsshowingsuboptimalresponsetoentecaviradefovircombinationtherapy AT ahnsunghyun efficacyoftenofovirbasedtherapyinpatientsshowingsuboptimalresponsetoentecaviradefovircombinationtherapy AT kosoonyoung efficacyoftenofovirbasedtherapyinpatientsshowingsuboptimalresponsetoentecaviradefovircombinationtherapy AT choewonhyeok efficacyoftenofovirbasedtherapyinpatientsshowingsuboptimalresponsetoentecaviradefovircombinationtherapy AT kimkyunhwan efficacyoftenofovirbasedtherapyinpatientsshowingsuboptimalresponsetoentecaviradefovircombinationtherapy AT kwonsoyoung efficacyoftenofovirbasedtherapyinpatientsshowingsuboptimalresponsetoentecaviradefovircombinationtherapy |