Cargando…

To wake up cancer stem cells, or to let them sleep, that is the question

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) generate transient‐amplifying cells and thereby contribute to cancer propagation. A fuller understanding of the biological features of CSCs is expected to lead to the development of new anticancer therapies capable of eradicating this life‐threatening disease. Cancer stem ce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takeishi, Shoichiro, Nakayama, Keiichi I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4946711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27116333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.12958
_version_ 1782443061473705984
author Takeishi, Shoichiro
Nakayama, Keiichi I.
author_facet Takeishi, Shoichiro
Nakayama, Keiichi I.
author_sort Takeishi, Shoichiro
collection PubMed
description Cancer stem cells (CSCs) generate transient‐amplifying cells and thereby contribute to cancer propagation. A fuller understanding of the biological features of CSCs is expected to lead to the development of new anticancer therapies capable of eradicating this life‐threatening disease. Cancer stem cells are known to maintain a non‐proliferative state and to enter the cell cycle only infrequently. Given that conventional anticancer therapies preferentially target dividing cells, CSCs are resistant to such treatments, with those remaining after elimination of bulk cancer cells potentially giving rise to disease relapse and metastasis as they re‐enter the cell cycle after a period of latency. Targeting of the switch between quiescence and proliferation in CSCs is therefore a potential strategy for preventing the reinitiation of malignancy, underscoring the importance of elucidation of the mechanisms by which these cells are maintained in the quiescent state. The fundamental properties of CSCs are thought to be governed cooperatively by internal molecules and cues from the external microenvironment (stem cell niche). Several such intrinsic and extrinsic regulators are responsible for the control of cell cycle progression in CSCs. In this review, we address two opposite approaches to the therapeutic targeting of CSCs – wake‐up and hibernation therapies – that either promote or prevent the entry of CSCs into the cell cycle, respectively, and we discuss the potential advantages and risks of each strategy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4946711
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49467112016-07-27 To wake up cancer stem cells, or to let them sleep, that is the question Takeishi, Shoichiro Nakayama, Keiichi I. Cancer Sci Review Articles Cancer stem cells (CSCs) generate transient‐amplifying cells and thereby contribute to cancer propagation. A fuller understanding of the biological features of CSCs is expected to lead to the development of new anticancer therapies capable of eradicating this life‐threatening disease. Cancer stem cells are known to maintain a non‐proliferative state and to enter the cell cycle only infrequently. Given that conventional anticancer therapies preferentially target dividing cells, CSCs are resistant to such treatments, with those remaining after elimination of bulk cancer cells potentially giving rise to disease relapse and metastasis as they re‐enter the cell cycle after a period of latency. Targeting of the switch between quiescence and proliferation in CSCs is therefore a potential strategy for preventing the reinitiation of malignancy, underscoring the importance of elucidation of the mechanisms by which these cells are maintained in the quiescent state. The fundamental properties of CSCs are thought to be governed cooperatively by internal molecules and cues from the external microenvironment (stem cell niche). Several such intrinsic and extrinsic regulators are responsible for the control of cell cycle progression in CSCs. In this review, we address two opposite approaches to the therapeutic targeting of CSCs – wake‐up and hibernation therapies – that either promote or prevent the entry of CSCs into the cell cycle, respectively, and we discuss the potential advantages and risks of each strategy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-06-20 2016-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4946711/ /pubmed/27116333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.12958 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Takeishi, Shoichiro
Nakayama, Keiichi I.
To wake up cancer stem cells, or to let them sleep, that is the question
title To wake up cancer stem cells, or to let them sleep, that is the question
title_full To wake up cancer stem cells, or to let them sleep, that is the question
title_fullStr To wake up cancer stem cells, or to let them sleep, that is the question
title_full_unstemmed To wake up cancer stem cells, or to let them sleep, that is the question
title_short To wake up cancer stem cells, or to let them sleep, that is the question
title_sort to wake up cancer stem cells, or to let them sleep, that is the question
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4946711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27116333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.12958
work_keys_str_mv AT takeishishoichiro towakeupcancerstemcellsortoletthemsleepthatisthequestion
AT nakayamakeiichii towakeupcancerstemcellsortoletthemsleepthatisthequestion