Cargando…

A faecal exposure assessment of farm workers in Accra, Ghana: a cross sectional study

BACKGROUND: Wastewater use in urban agriculture is common as a result of rapid urbanisation, and increasing competition for good quality water. In order to minimize risks to farmers and consumers of wastewater irrigated produce the World Health Organization (WHO) has developed guidelines for the saf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Antwi-Agyei, Prince, Biran, Adam, Peasey, Anne, Bruce, Jane, Ensink, Jeroen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4947311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27423694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3266-8
_version_ 1782443154457231360
author Antwi-Agyei, Prince
Biran, Adam
Peasey, Anne
Bruce, Jane
Ensink, Jeroen
author_facet Antwi-Agyei, Prince
Biran, Adam
Peasey, Anne
Bruce, Jane
Ensink, Jeroen
author_sort Antwi-Agyei, Prince
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Wastewater use in urban agriculture is common as a result of rapid urbanisation, and increasing competition for good quality water. In order to minimize risks to farmers and consumers of wastewater irrigated produce the World Health Organization (WHO) has developed guidelines for the safe use of wastewater in agriculture. These guidelines are based on a Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment (QMRA) model, though the reliability of this model has been questioned due to a lack of primary data. This study aimed to assess the ability of the WHO guidelines to protect farmers’ health, by identifying and quantifying key exposures associated with the transmission of faecal pathogens in wastewater irrigated agriculture. METHODS: Eighty farmers were observed and interviewed during the dry and wet seasons, and water and soil samples were analysed for the presence of E. coli. STATA 12 was used for descriptive analyses of farmers’ exposure and risk practices, and also to determine risk factors for soil and irrigation water contamination, while the WHO QMRA model and @Risk 6 were used to model farmers’ infection risk to pathogens. RESULTS: The results showed that although irrigation water was highly contaminated (5.6 Log E. coli/100 ml), exposure to farm soil (2.3 Log E. coli/g) was found to be the key risk pathway due to soil-to-mouth events. During the observations 93 % of farmers worked barefoot, 86 % experienced hand-to-soil contact, while 53 % experienced ‘soil’-to-mouth events, while no ‘water’ to mouth contacts were observed. On average, farmers were found to have 10 hand-to-mouth events per day. From the indicator based QMRA model the estimated norovirus infection risk to farmers was found to be higher than guidelines set by the WHO. CONCLUSIONS: This study found exposure to soil as the critical pathway of pathogen risk in wastewater farmers, and that this risk exceeded recommended health targets. The study recommends the incorporation of hand-to-mouth events, the use of actual pathogen concentrations, and the use of direct exposure frequencies in order to improve the reliability of risk estimates from QMRA models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4947311
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49473112016-07-17 A faecal exposure assessment of farm workers in Accra, Ghana: a cross sectional study Antwi-Agyei, Prince Biran, Adam Peasey, Anne Bruce, Jane Ensink, Jeroen BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Wastewater use in urban agriculture is common as a result of rapid urbanisation, and increasing competition for good quality water. In order to minimize risks to farmers and consumers of wastewater irrigated produce the World Health Organization (WHO) has developed guidelines for the safe use of wastewater in agriculture. These guidelines are based on a Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment (QMRA) model, though the reliability of this model has been questioned due to a lack of primary data. This study aimed to assess the ability of the WHO guidelines to protect farmers’ health, by identifying and quantifying key exposures associated with the transmission of faecal pathogens in wastewater irrigated agriculture. METHODS: Eighty farmers were observed and interviewed during the dry and wet seasons, and water and soil samples were analysed for the presence of E. coli. STATA 12 was used for descriptive analyses of farmers’ exposure and risk practices, and also to determine risk factors for soil and irrigation water contamination, while the WHO QMRA model and @Risk 6 were used to model farmers’ infection risk to pathogens. RESULTS: The results showed that although irrigation water was highly contaminated (5.6 Log E. coli/100 ml), exposure to farm soil (2.3 Log E. coli/g) was found to be the key risk pathway due to soil-to-mouth events. During the observations 93 % of farmers worked barefoot, 86 % experienced hand-to-soil contact, while 53 % experienced ‘soil’-to-mouth events, while no ‘water’ to mouth contacts were observed. On average, farmers were found to have 10 hand-to-mouth events per day. From the indicator based QMRA model the estimated norovirus infection risk to farmers was found to be higher than guidelines set by the WHO. CONCLUSIONS: This study found exposure to soil as the critical pathway of pathogen risk in wastewater farmers, and that this risk exceeded recommended health targets. The study recommends the incorporation of hand-to-mouth events, the use of actual pathogen concentrations, and the use of direct exposure frequencies in order to improve the reliability of risk estimates from QMRA models. BioMed Central 2016-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4947311/ /pubmed/27423694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3266-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Antwi-Agyei, Prince
Biran, Adam
Peasey, Anne
Bruce, Jane
Ensink, Jeroen
A faecal exposure assessment of farm workers in Accra, Ghana: a cross sectional study
title A faecal exposure assessment of farm workers in Accra, Ghana: a cross sectional study
title_full A faecal exposure assessment of farm workers in Accra, Ghana: a cross sectional study
title_fullStr A faecal exposure assessment of farm workers in Accra, Ghana: a cross sectional study
title_full_unstemmed A faecal exposure assessment of farm workers in Accra, Ghana: a cross sectional study
title_short A faecal exposure assessment of farm workers in Accra, Ghana: a cross sectional study
title_sort faecal exposure assessment of farm workers in accra, ghana: a cross sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4947311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27423694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3266-8
work_keys_str_mv AT antwiagyeiprince afaecalexposureassessmentoffarmworkersinaccraghanaacrosssectionalstudy
AT biranadam afaecalexposureassessmentoffarmworkersinaccraghanaacrosssectionalstudy
AT peaseyanne afaecalexposureassessmentoffarmworkersinaccraghanaacrosssectionalstudy
AT brucejane afaecalexposureassessmentoffarmworkersinaccraghanaacrosssectionalstudy
AT ensinkjeroen afaecalexposureassessmentoffarmworkersinaccraghanaacrosssectionalstudy
AT antwiagyeiprince faecalexposureassessmentoffarmworkersinaccraghanaacrosssectionalstudy
AT biranadam faecalexposureassessmentoffarmworkersinaccraghanaacrosssectionalstudy
AT peaseyanne faecalexposureassessmentoffarmworkersinaccraghanaacrosssectionalstudy
AT brucejane faecalexposureassessmentoffarmworkersinaccraghanaacrosssectionalstudy
AT ensinkjeroen faecalexposureassessmentoffarmworkersinaccraghanaacrosssectionalstudy