Cargando…

Role of nutritional status and intervention in oesophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy: outcomes from SCOPE1

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition is common in oesophageal cancer. We aimed to identify nutritional prognostic factors and survival outcomes associated with nutritional intervention in the SCOPE1 (Study of Chemoradiotherapy in OesoPhageal Cancer with or without Erbitux) trial. METHODS: Two hundred and fifty...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cox, S, Powell, C, Carter, B, Hurt, C, Mukherjee, Somnath, Crosby, Thomas David Lewis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4947693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27328311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.129
_version_ 1782443210082091008
author Cox, S
Powell, C
Carter, B
Hurt, C
Mukherjee, Somnath
Crosby, Thomas David Lewis
author_facet Cox, S
Powell, C
Carter, B
Hurt, C
Mukherjee, Somnath
Crosby, Thomas David Lewis
author_sort Cox, S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Malnutrition is common in oesophageal cancer. We aimed to identify nutritional prognostic factors and survival outcomes associated with nutritional intervention in the SCOPE1 (Study of Chemoradiotherapy in OesoPhageal Cancer with or without Erbitux) trial. METHODS: Two hundred and fifty eight patients were randomly allocated to definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) +/− cetuximab. Nutritional Risk Index (NRI) scores were calculated; NRI<100 identified patients at risk of malnutrition. Nutritional intervention included dietary advice, oral supplementation or major intervention (enteral feeding/tube placement). Univariable and multivariable analyses using Cox proportional hazard modelling were conducted. RESULTS: At baseline NRI<100 strongly predicted for reduced overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) 12.45, 95% CI 5.24–29.57; P<0.001). Nutritional intervention improved survival if provided at baseline (dietary advice (HR 0.12, P=0.004), oral supplementation (HR 0.13, P<0.001) or major intervention (HR 0.13, P=0.003)), but not if provided later in the treatment course. Cetuximab patients receiving major nutritional intervention had worse outcomes compared with controls (13 vs 28 months, P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-treatment assessment and correction of malnutrition may improve survival outcomes in oesophageal cancer patients treated with dCRT. Nutritional Risk Index is a simple and objective screening tool to identify patients at risk of malnutrition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4947693
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49476932016-07-27 Role of nutritional status and intervention in oesophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy: outcomes from SCOPE1 Cox, S Powell, C Carter, B Hurt, C Mukherjee, Somnath Crosby, Thomas David Lewis Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: Malnutrition is common in oesophageal cancer. We aimed to identify nutritional prognostic factors and survival outcomes associated with nutritional intervention in the SCOPE1 (Study of Chemoradiotherapy in OesoPhageal Cancer with or without Erbitux) trial. METHODS: Two hundred and fifty eight patients were randomly allocated to definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) +/− cetuximab. Nutritional Risk Index (NRI) scores were calculated; NRI<100 identified patients at risk of malnutrition. Nutritional intervention included dietary advice, oral supplementation or major intervention (enteral feeding/tube placement). Univariable and multivariable analyses using Cox proportional hazard modelling were conducted. RESULTS: At baseline NRI<100 strongly predicted for reduced overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) 12.45, 95% CI 5.24–29.57; P<0.001). Nutritional intervention improved survival if provided at baseline (dietary advice (HR 0.12, P=0.004), oral supplementation (HR 0.13, P<0.001) or major intervention (HR 0.13, P=0.003)), but not if provided later in the treatment course. Cetuximab patients receiving major nutritional intervention had worse outcomes compared with controls (13 vs 28 months, P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-treatment assessment and correction of malnutrition may improve survival outcomes in oesophageal cancer patients treated with dCRT. Nutritional Risk Index is a simple and objective screening tool to identify patients at risk of malnutrition. Nature Publishing Group 2016-07-12 2016-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4947693/ /pubmed/27328311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.129 Text en Copyright © 2016 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Cox, S
Powell, C
Carter, B
Hurt, C
Mukherjee, Somnath
Crosby, Thomas David Lewis
Role of nutritional status and intervention in oesophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy: outcomes from SCOPE1
title Role of nutritional status and intervention in oesophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy: outcomes from SCOPE1
title_full Role of nutritional status and intervention in oesophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy: outcomes from SCOPE1
title_fullStr Role of nutritional status and intervention in oesophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy: outcomes from SCOPE1
title_full_unstemmed Role of nutritional status and intervention in oesophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy: outcomes from SCOPE1
title_short Role of nutritional status and intervention in oesophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy: outcomes from SCOPE1
title_sort role of nutritional status and intervention in oesophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy: outcomes from scope1
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4947693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27328311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.129
work_keys_str_mv AT coxs roleofnutritionalstatusandinterventioninoesophagealcancertreatedwithdefinitivechemoradiotherapyoutcomesfromscope1
AT powellc roleofnutritionalstatusandinterventioninoesophagealcancertreatedwithdefinitivechemoradiotherapyoutcomesfromscope1
AT carterb roleofnutritionalstatusandinterventioninoesophagealcancertreatedwithdefinitivechemoradiotherapyoutcomesfromscope1
AT hurtc roleofnutritionalstatusandinterventioninoesophagealcancertreatedwithdefinitivechemoradiotherapyoutcomesfromscope1
AT mukherjeesomnath roleofnutritionalstatusandinterventioninoesophagealcancertreatedwithdefinitivechemoradiotherapyoutcomesfromscope1
AT crosbythomasdavidlewis roleofnutritionalstatusandinterventioninoesophagealcancertreatedwithdefinitivechemoradiotherapyoutcomesfromscope1