Cargando…

Effectiveness of the Assessment of Burden of COPD (ABC) tool on health-related quality of life in patients with COPD: a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary and hospital care

OBJECTIVE: Assessing the effectiveness of the Assessment of Burden of COPD (ABC) tool on disease-specific quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) measured with the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), compared with usual care. METHODS: A pragmatic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slok, Annerika H M, Kotz, Daniel, van Breukelen, Gerard, Chavannes, Niels H, Rutten-van Mölken, Maureen P M H, Kerstjens, Huib A M, van der Molen, Thys, Asijee, Guus M, Dekhuijzen, P N Richard, Holverda, Sebastiaan, Salomé, Philippe L, Goossens, Lucas M A, Twellaar, Mascha, in ‘t Veen, Johannes C C M, van Schayck, Onno C P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4947734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27401361
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011519
_version_ 1782443219207847936
author Slok, Annerika H M
Kotz, Daniel
van Breukelen, Gerard
Chavannes, Niels H
Rutten-van Mölken, Maureen P M H
Kerstjens, Huib A M
van der Molen, Thys
Asijee, Guus M
Dekhuijzen, P N Richard
Holverda, Sebastiaan
Salomé, Philippe L
Goossens, Lucas M A
Twellaar, Mascha
in ‘t Veen, Johannes C C M
van Schayck, Onno C P
author_facet Slok, Annerika H M
Kotz, Daniel
van Breukelen, Gerard
Chavannes, Niels H
Rutten-van Mölken, Maureen P M H
Kerstjens, Huib A M
van der Molen, Thys
Asijee, Guus M
Dekhuijzen, P N Richard
Holverda, Sebastiaan
Salomé, Philippe L
Goossens, Lucas M A
Twellaar, Mascha
in ‘t Veen, Johannes C C M
van Schayck, Onno C P
author_sort Slok, Annerika H M
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Assessing the effectiveness of the Assessment of Burden of COPD (ABC) tool on disease-specific quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) measured with the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), compared with usual care. METHODS: A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial, in 39 Dutch primary care practices and 17 hospitals, with 357 patients with COPD (postbronchodilator FEV(1)/FVC ratio <0.7) aged ≥40 years, who could understand and read the Dutch language. Healthcare providers were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. The intervention group applied the ABC tool, which consists of a short validated questionnaire assessing the experienced burden of COPD, objective COPD parameter (eg, lung function) and a treatment algorithm including a visual display and treatment advice. The control group provided usual care. Researchers were blinded to group allocation during analyses. Primary outcome was the number of patients with a clinically relevant improvement in SGRQ score between baseline and 18-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes were the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC; a measurement of perceived quality of care). RESULTS: At 18-month follow-up, 34% of the 146 patients from 27 healthcare providers in the intervention group showed a clinically relevant improvement in the SGRQ, compared with 22% of the 148 patients from 29 healthcare providers in the control group (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.08 to 3.16). No difference was found on the CAT (−0.26 points (scores ranging from 0 to 40); 95% CI −1.52 to 0.99). The PACIC showed a higher improvement in the intervention group (0.32 points (scores ranging from 1 to 5); 95% CI 0.14 to 0.50). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that use of the ABC tool may increase quality of life and perceived quality of care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR3788; Results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4947734
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49477342016-08-03 Effectiveness of the Assessment of Burden of COPD (ABC) tool on health-related quality of life in patients with COPD: a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary and hospital care Slok, Annerika H M Kotz, Daniel van Breukelen, Gerard Chavannes, Niels H Rutten-van Mölken, Maureen P M H Kerstjens, Huib A M van der Molen, Thys Asijee, Guus M Dekhuijzen, P N Richard Holverda, Sebastiaan Salomé, Philippe L Goossens, Lucas M A Twellaar, Mascha in ‘t Veen, Johannes C C M van Schayck, Onno C P BMJ Open Respiratory Medicine OBJECTIVE: Assessing the effectiveness of the Assessment of Burden of COPD (ABC) tool on disease-specific quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) measured with the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), compared with usual care. METHODS: A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial, in 39 Dutch primary care practices and 17 hospitals, with 357 patients with COPD (postbronchodilator FEV(1)/FVC ratio <0.7) aged ≥40 years, who could understand and read the Dutch language. Healthcare providers were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. The intervention group applied the ABC tool, which consists of a short validated questionnaire assessing the experienced burden of COPD, objective COPD parameter (eg, lung function) and a treatment algorithm including a visual display and treatment advice. The control group provided usual care. Researchers were blinded to group allocation during analyses. Primary outcome was the number of patients with a clinically relevant improvement in SGRQ score between baseline and 18-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes were the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC; a measurement of perceived quality of care). RESULTS: At 18-month follow-up, 34% of the 146 patients from 27 healthcare providers in the intervention group showed a clinically relevant improvement in the SGRQ, compared with 22% of the 148 patients from 29 healthcare providers in the control group (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.08 to 3.16). No difference was found on the CAT (−0.26 points (scores ranging from 0 to 40); 95% CI −1.52 to 0.99). The PACIC showed a higher improvement in the intervention group (0.32 points (scores ranging from 1 to 5); 95% CI 0.14 to 0.50). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that use of the ABC tool may increase quality of life and perceived quality of care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR3788; Results. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4947734/ /pubmed/27401361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011519 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Respiratory Medicine
Slok, Annerika H M
Kotz, Daniel
van Breukelen, Gerard
Chavannes, Niels H
Rutten-van Mölken, Maureen P M H
Kerstjens, Huib A M
van der Molen, Thys
Asijee, Guus M
Dekhuijzen, P N Richard
Holverda, Sebastiaan
Salomé, Philippe L
Goossens, Lucas M A
Twellaar, Mascha
in ‘t Veen, Johannes C C M
van Schayck, Onno C P
Effectiveness of the Assessment of Burden of COPD (ABC) tool on health-related quality of life in patients with COPD: a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary and hospital care
title Effectiveness of the Assessment of Burden of COPD (ABC) tool on health-related quality of life in patients with COPD: a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary and hospital care
title_full Effectiveness of the Assessment of Burden of COPD (ABC) tool on health-related quality of life in patients with COPD: a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary and hospital care
title_fullStr Effectiveness of the Assessment of Burden of COPD (ABC) tool on health-related quality of life in patients with COPD: a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary and hospital care
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of the Assessment of Burden of COPD (ABC) tool on health-related quality of life in patients with COPD: a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary and hospital care
title_short Effectiveness of the Assessment of Burden of COPD (ABC) tool on health-related quality of life in patients with COPD: a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary and hospital care
title_sort effectiveness of the assessment of burden of copd (abc) tool on health-related quality of life in patients with copd: a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary and hospital care
topic Respiratory Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4947734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27401361
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011519
work_keys_str_mv AT slokannerikahm effectivenessoftheassessmentofburdenofcopdabctoolonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithcopdaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialinprimaryandhospitalcare
AT kotzdaniel effectivenessoftheassessmentofburdenofcopdabctoolonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithcopdaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialinprimaryandhospitalcare
AT vanbreukelengerard effectivenessoftheassessmentofburdenofcopdabctoolonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithcopdaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialinprimaryandhospitalcare
AT chavannesnielsh effectivenessoftheassessmentofburdenofcopdabctoolonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithcopdaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialinprimaryandhospitalcare
AT ruttenvanmolkenmaureenpmh effectivenessoftheassessmentofburdenofcopdabctoolonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithcopdaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialinprimaryandhospitalcare
AT kerstjenshuibam effectivenessoftheassessmentofburdenofcopdabctoolonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithcopdaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialinprimaryandhospitalcare
AT vandermolenthys effectivenessoftheassessmentofburdenofcopdabctoolonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithcopdaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialinprimaryandhospitalcare
AT asijeeguusm effectivenessoftheassessmentofburdenofcopdabctoolonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithcopdaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialinprimaryandhospitalcare
AT dekhuijzenpnrichard effectivenessoftheassessmentofburdenofcopdabctoolonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithcopdaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialinprimaryandhospitalcare
AT holverdasebastiaan effectivenessoftheassessmentofburdenofcopdabctoolonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithcopdaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialinprimaryandhospitalcare
AT salomephilippel effectivenessoftheassessmentofburdenofcopdabctoolonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithcopdaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialinprimaryandhospitalcare
AT goossenslucasma effectivenessoftheassessmentofburdenofcopdabctoolonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithcopdaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialinprimaryandhospitalcare
AT twellaarmascha effectivenessoftheassessmentofburdenofcopdabctoolonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithcopdaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialinprimaryandhospitalcare
AT intveenjohannesccm effectivenessoftheassessmentofburdenofcopdabctoolonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithcopdaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialinprimaryandhospitalcare
AT vanschayckonnocp effectivenessoftheassessmentofburdenofcopdabctoolonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithcopdaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialinprimaryandhospitalcare