Cargando…

Review of 99 self-report measures for assessing well-being in adults: exploring dimensions of well-being and developments over time

OBJECTIVE: Investigators within many disciplines are using measures of well-being, but it is not always clear what they are measuring, or which instruments may best meet their objectives. The aims of this review were to: systematically identify well-being instruments, explore the variety of well-bei...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Linton, Myles-Jay, Dieppe, Paul, Medina-Lara, Antonieta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4947747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27388349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010641
_version_ 1782443222171123712
author Linton, Myles-Jay
Dieppe, Paul
Medina-Lara, Antonieta
author_facet Linton, Myles-Jay
Dieppe, Paul
Medina-Lara, Antonieta
author_sort Linton, Myles-Jay
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Investigators within many disciplines are using measures of well-being, but it is not always clear what they are measuring, or which instruments may best meet their objectives. The aims of this review were to: systematically identify well-being instruments, explore the variety of well-being dimensions within instruments and describe how the production of instruments has developed over time. DESIGN: Systematic searches, thematic analysis and narrative synthesis were undertaken. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, EconLit, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library and CINAHL from 1993 to 2014 complemented by web searches and expert consultations through 2015. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Instruments were selected for review if they were designed for adults (≥18 years old), generic (ie, non-disease or context specific) and available in an English version. RESULTS: A total of 99 measures of well-being were included, and 196 dimensions of well-being were identified within them. Dimensions clustered around 6 key thematic domains: mental well-being, social well-being, physical well-being, spiritual well-being, activities and functioning, and personal circumstances. Authors were rarely explicit about how existing theories had influenced the design of their tools; however, the 2 most referenced theories were Diener's model of subjective well-being and the WHO definition of health. The period between 1990 and 1999 produced the greatest number of newly developed well-being instruments (n=27). An illustration of the dimensions identified and the instruments that measure them is provided within a thematic framework of well-being. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides researchers with an organised toolkit of instruments, dimensions and an accompanying glossary. The striking variability between instruments supports the need to pay close attention to what is being assessed under the umbrella of ‘well-being’ measurement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4947747
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49477472016-08-03 Review of 99 self-report measures for assessing well-being in adults: exploring dimensions of well-being and developments over time Linton, Myles-Jay Dieppe, Paul Medina-Lara, Antonieta BMJ Open Research Methods OBJECTIVE: Investigators within many disciplines are using measures of well-being, but it is not always clear what they are measuring, or which instruments may best meet their objectives. The aims of this review were to: systematically identify well-being instruments, explore the variety of well-being dimensions within instruments and describe how the production of instruments has developed over time. DESIGN: Systematic searches, thematic analysis and narrative synthesis were undertaken. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, EconLit, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library and CINAHL from 1993 to 2014 complemented by web searches and expert consultations through 2015. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Instruments were selected for review if they were designed for adults (≥18 years old), generic (ie, non-disease or context specific) and available in an English version. RESULTS: A total of 99 measures of well-being were included, and 196 dimensions of well-being were identified within them. Dimensions clustered around 6 key thematic domains: mental well-being, social well-being, physical well-being, spiritual well-being, activities and functioning, and personal circumstances. Authors were rarely explicit about how existing theories had influenced the design of their tools; however, the 2 most referenced theories were Diener's model of subjective well-being and the WHO definition of health. The period between 1990 and 1999 produced the greatest number of newly developed well-being instruments (n=27). An illustration of the dimensions identified and the instruments that measure them is provided within a thematic framework of well-being. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides researchers with an organised toolkit of instruments, dimensions and an accompanying glossary. The striking variability between instruments supports the need to pay close attention to what is being assessed under the umbrella of ‘well-being’ measurement. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4947747/ /pubmed/27388349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010641 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Research Methods
Linton, Myles-Jay
Dieppe, Paul
Medina-Lara, Antonieta
Review of 99 self-report measures for assessing well-being in adults: exploring dimensions of well-being and developments over time
title Review of 99 self-report measures for assessing well-being in adults: exploring dimensions of well-being and developments over time
title_full Review of 99 self-report measures for assessing well-being in adults: exploring dimensions of well-being and developments over time
title_fullStr Review of 99 self-report measures for assessing well-being in adults: exploring dimensions of well-being and developments over time
title_full_unstemmed Review of 99 self-report measures for assessing well-being in adults: exploring dimensions of well-being and developments over time
title_short Review of 99 self-report measures for assessing well-being in adults: exploring dimensions of well-being and developments over time
title_sort review of 99 self-report measures for assessing well-being in adults: exploring dimensions of well-being and developments over time
topic Research Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4947747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27388349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010641
work_keys_str_mv AT lintonmylesjay reviewof99selfreportmeasuresforassessingwellbeinginadultsexploringdimensionsofwellbeinganddevelopmentsovertime
AT dieppepaul reviewof99selfreportmeasuresforassessingwellbeinginadultsexploringdimensionsofwellbeinganddevelopmentsovertime
AT medinalaraantonieta reviewof99selfreportmeasuresforassessingwellbeinginadultsexploringdimensionsofwellbeinganddevelopmentsovertime