Cargando…

PERS&O (PERsistent Sitagliptin treatment & Outcomes): observational retrospective study on cardiovascular risk evolution in patients with type 2 diabetes on persistent sitagliptin treatment

OBJECTIVES: The UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Risk Engine (RE) provides the best risk estimates available for people with type 2 diabetes (T2D), so it was applied to patients on persistent sitagliptin treatment. DESIGN: A ‘real-world’ retrospective, observational, single-center study. SETTIN...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buonaiuto, Giulia, De Mori, Valentina, Braus, Alessandra, Balini, Annalisa, Berzi, Denise, Carpinteri, Rita, Forloni, Franco, Meregalli, Giancarla, Ronco, Gian Luca, Bossi, Antonio C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4947782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27486519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000216
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: The UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Risk Engine (RE) provides the best risk estimates available for people with type 2 diabetes (T2D), so it was applied to patients on persistent sitagliptin treatment. DESIGN: A ‘real-world’ retrospective, observational, single-center study. SETTING: The study was performed in a general hospital in Northern Italy in order: (1) to validate UKPDS RE in a cohort of Italian participants with T2D without prespecified diabetes duration, with/without cardiovascular (CV) disease, treated with sitagliptin; (2) to confirm CV risk gender difference; (3) to evaluate the effect on metabolic control and on CV risk evolution obtained by ‘add-on’ persistent sitagliptin treatment. PARTICIPANTS: Sitagliptin 100 mg once a day was taken by 462 participants with T2D: 170 of them (males: 106; age: 63.6±8.8; T2D duration: 11.58±7.33; females: 64; age: 65.6±7.95; T2D duration 13.5±7.9) were treated for 48 months with the same dosage. INTERVENTIONS: An analysis of normality was performed both for continuous, and for groups variables on UKPDS RE percentage values, defining the requirement of a base log(10) transformation to normalize risk factor values for analysis validation. RESULTS: The evaluation of CV risk evolution by gender (t-test) confirmed the expected statistical difference (p<0.0001). Sitagliptin obtained significant results after 12 months, and at the end of the observation, both on metabolic control (expressed by glycated hemoglobin) and on UKPDS RE. Analysis of variance test revealed a significant effect on CV risk after 12 months (p=0.003), and after 48 months (p=0.04). A bivariate correlation analysis revealed a correlation index (r)=0.2 between the two variables (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These ‘real-world’ data obtained applying UKPDS RE may reflect patients’ and clinicians’ interest in realizing individual CV risk, and its evolution. Sitagliptin-persistent treatment for a medium–long period obtained an improvement on metabolic control, as well as a reduction on CV risk.