Cargando…

Sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for type 2 diabetes and morbid obesity: double-blind randomised clinical trial protocol

INTRODUCTION: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) in association with obesity is an increasing disease burden. Bariatric surgery is the only effective therapy for achieving remission of T2D among those with morbid obesity. It is unclear which of the two most commonly performed types of bariatric surgery, laparosc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murphy, Rinki, Evennett, Nicholas J, Clarke, Michael G, Robinson, Steven J, Humphreys, Lee, Jones, Bronwen, Kim, David D, Cutfield, Richard, Plank, Lindsay D, Hammodat, Hisham, Booth, Michael W C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4947793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27377635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011416
_version_ 1782443232197607424
author Murphy, Rinki
Evennett, Nicholas J
Clarke, Michael G
Robinson, Steven J
Humphreys, Lee
Jones, Bronwen
Kim, David D
Cutfield, Richard
Plank, Lindsay D
Hammodat, Hisham
Booth, Michael W C
author_facet Murphy, Rinki
Evennett, Nicholas J
Clarke, Michael G
Robinson, Steven J
Humphreys, Lee
Jones, Bronwen
Kim, David D
Cutfield, Richard
Plank, Lindsay D
Hammodat, Hisham
Booth, Michael W C
author_sort Murphy, Rinki
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) in association with obesity is an increasing disease burden. Bariatric surgery is the only effective therapy for achieving remission of T2D among those with morbid obesity. It is unclear which of the two most commonly performed types of bariatric surgery, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), is most effective for obese patients with T2D. The primary objective of this study is to determine whether LSG or LRYGB is more effective in achieving HbA(1c)<6% (<42 mmol/mol) without the use of diabetes medication at 5 years. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Single-centre, double-blind (assessor and patient), parallel, randomised clinical trial (RCT) conducted in New Zealand, targeting 106 patients. Eligibility criteria include age 20–55 years, T2D of at least 6 months duration and body mass index 35–65 kg/m(2) for at least 5 years. Randomisation 1:1 to LSG or LRYGB, used random number codes disclosed to the operating surgeon after induction of anaesthesia. A standard medication adjustment schedule will be used during postoperative metabolic assessments. Secondary outcomes include proportions achieving HbA(1c)<5.7% (39 mmol/mol) or HbA(1c)<6.5% (48 mmol/mol) without the use of diabetes medication, comparative weight loss, obesity-related comorbidity, operative complications, revision rate, mortality, quality of life, anxiety and depression scores. Exploratory outcomes include changes in satiety, gut hormone and gut microbiota to gain underlying mechanistic insights into T2D remission. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the New Zealand regional ethics committee (NZ93405) who also provided independent safety monitoring of the trial. Study commenced in September 2011. Recruitment completed in October 2014. Data collection is ongoing. Results will be reported in manuscripts submitted to peer-reviewed journals and in presentations at national and international meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: ACTRN12611000751976, NCT01486680; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4947793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49477932016-08-03 Sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for type 2 diabetes and morbid obesity: double-blind randomised clinical trial protocol Murphy, Rinki Evennett, Nicholas J Clarke, Michael G Robinson, Steven J Humphreys, Lee Jones, Bronwen Kim, David D Cutfield, Richard Plank, Lindsay D Hammodat, Hisham Booth, Michael W C BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) in association with obesity is an increasing disease burden. Bariatric surgery is the only effective therapy for achieving remission of T2D among those with morbid obesity. It is unclear which of the two most commonly performed types of bariatric surgery, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), is most effective for obese patients with T2D. The primary objective of this study is to determine whether LSG or LRYGB is more effective in achieving HbA(1c)<6% (<42 mmol/mol) without the use of diabetes medication at 5 years. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Single-centre, double-blind (assessor and patient), parallel, randomised clinical trial (RCT) conducted in New Zealand, targeting 106 patients. Eligibility criteria include age 20–55 years, T2D of at least 6 months duration and body mass index 35–65 kg/m(2) for at least 5 years. Randomisation 1:1 to LSG or LRYGB, used random number codes disclosed to the operating surgeon after induction of anaesthesia. A standard medication adjustment schedule will be used during postoperative metabolic assessments. Secondary outcomes include proportions achieving HbA(1c)<5.7% (39 mmol/mol) or HbA(1c)<6.5% (48 mmol/mol) without the use of diabetes medication, comparative weight loss, obesity-related comorbidity, operative complications, revision rate, mortality, quality of life, anxiety and depression scores. Exploratory outcomes include changes in satiety, gut hormone and gut microbiota to gain underlying mechanistic insights into T2D remission. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the New Zealand regional ethics committee (NZ93405) who also provided independent safety monitoring of the trial. Study commenced in September 2011. Recruitment completed in October 2014. Data collection is ongoing. Results will be reported in manuscripts submitted to peer-reviewed journals and in presentations at national and international meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: ACTRN12611000751976, NCT01486680; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4947793/ /pubmed/27377635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011416 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Surgery
Murphy, Rinki
Evennett, Nicholas J
Clarke, Michael G
Robinson, Steven J
Humphreys, Lee
Jones, Bronwen
Kim, David D
Cutfield, Richard
Plank, Lindsay D
Hammodat, Hisham
Booth, Michael W C
Sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for type 2 diabetes and morbid obesity: double-blind randomised clinical trial protocol
title Sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for type 2 diabetes and morbid obesity: double-blind randomised clinical trial protocol
title_full Sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for type 2 diabetes and morbid obesity: double-blind randomised clinical trial protocol
title_fullStr Sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for type 2 diabetes and morbid obesity: double-blind randomised clinical trial protocol
title_full_unstemmed Sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for type 2 diabetes and morbid obesity: double-blind randomised clinical trial protocol
title_short Sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for type 2 diabetes and morbid obesity: double-blind randomised clinical trial protocol
title_sort sleeve gastrectomy versus roux-en-y gastric bypass for type 2 diabetes and morbid obesity: double-blind randomised clinical trial protocol
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4947793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27377635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011416
work_keys_str_mv AT murphyrinki sleevegastrectomyversusrouxenygastricbypassfortype2diabetesandmorbidobesitydoubleblindrandomisedclinicaltrialprotocol
AT evennettnicholasj sleevegastrectomyversusrouxenygastricbypassfortype2diabetesandmorbidobesitydoubleblindrandomisedclinicaltrialprotocol
AT clarkemichaelg sleevegastrectomyversusrouxenygastricbypassfortype2diabetesandmorbidobesitydoubleblindrandomisedclinicaltrialprotocol
AT robinsonstevenj sleevegastrectomyversusrouxenygastricbypassfortype2diabetesandmorbidobesitydoubleblindrandomisedclinicaltrialprotocol
AT humphreyslee sleevegastrectomyversusrouxenygastricbypassfortype2diabetesandmorbidobesitydoubleblindrandomisedclinicaltrialprotocol
AT jonesbronwen sleevegastrectomyversusrouxenygastricbypassfortype2diabetesandmorbidobesitydoubleblindrandomisedclinicaltrialprotocol
AT kimdavidd sleevegastrectomyversusrouxenygastricbypassfortype2diabetesandmorbidobesitydoubleblindrandomisedclinicaltrialprotocol
AT cutfieldrichard sleevegastrectomyversusrouxenygastricbypassfortype2diabetesandmorbidobesitydoubleblindrandomisedclinicaltrialprotocol
AT planklindsayd sleevegastrectomyversusrouxenygastricbypassfortype2diabetesandmorbidobesitydoubleblindrandomisedclinicaltrialprotocol
AT hammodathisham sleevegastrectomyversusrouxenygastricbypassfortype2diabetesandmorbidobesitydoubleblindrandomisedclinicaltrialprotocol
AT boothmichaelwc sleevegastrectomyversusrouxenygastricbypassfortype2diabetesandmorbidobesitydoubleblindrandomisedclinicaltrialprotocol