Cargando…
Healthcare professional and patient codesign and validation of a mechanism for service users to feedback patient safety experiences following a care transfer: a qualitative study
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a mechanism for patients to provide feedback on safety experiences following a care transfer between organisations. DESIGN: Qualitative study using participatory methods (codesign workshops) and cognitive interviews. Workshop data were analysed concurrently with pa...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4947796/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27406641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011222 |
_version_ | 1782443232878133248 |
---|---|
author | Scott, Jason Heavey, Emily Waring, Justin Jones, Diana Dawson, Pamela |
author_facet | Scott, Jason Heavey, Emily Waring, Justin Jones, Diana Dawson, Pamela |
author_sort | Scott, Jason |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a mechanism for patients to provide feedback on safety experiences following a care transfer between organisations. DESIGN: Qualitative study using participatory methods (codesign workshops) and cognitive interviews. Workshop data were analysed concurrently with participants, and cognitive interviews were thematically analysed using a deductive approach based on the developed feedback mechanism. PARTICIPANTS: Expert patients (n=5) and healthcare professionals (n=11) were recruited purposively to develop the feedback mechanism in 2 workshops. Workshop 1 explored principles underpinning safety feedback mechanisms, and workshop 2 included the practical development of the feedback mechanism. Final design and content of the feedback mechanism (a safety survey) were verified by workshop participants, and cognitive interviews (n=28) were conducted with patients. RESULTS: Workshop participants identified that safety feedback mechanisms should be patient-centred, short and concise with clear signposting on how to complete, with an option to be anonymous and balanced between positive (safe) and negative (unsafe) experiences. The agreed feedback mechanism consisted of a survey split across 3 stages of the care transfer: departure, journey and arrival. Care across organisational boundaries was recognised as being complex, with healthcare professionals acknowledging the difficulty implementing changes that impact other organisations. Cognitive interview participants agreed the content of the survey was relevant but identified barriers to completion relating to the survey formatting and understanding of a care transfer. CONCLUSIONS: Participatory, codesign principles helped overcome differences in understandings of safety in the complex setting of care transfers when developing a safety survey. Practical barriers to the survey's usability and acceptability to patients were identified, resulting in a modified survey design. Further research is required to determine the usability and acceptability of the survey to patients and healthcare professionals, as well as identifying how governance structures should accommodate patient feedback when relating to multiple health or social care providers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4947796 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49477962016-08-03 Healthcare professional and patient codesign and validation of a mechanism for service users to feedback patient safety experiences following a care transfer: a qualitative study Scott, Jason Heavey, Emily Waring, Justin Jones, Diana Dawson, Pamela BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a mechanism for patients to provide feedback on safety experiences following a care transfer between organisations. DESIGN: Qualitative study using participatory methods (codesign workshops) and cognitive interviews. Workshop data were analysed concurrently with participants, and cognitive interviews were thematically analysed using a deductive approach based on the developed feedback mechanism. PARTICIPANTS: Expert patients (n=5) and healthcare professionals (n=11) were recruited purposively to develop the feedback mechanism in 2 workshops. Workshop 1 explored principles underpinning safety feedback mechanisms, and workshop 2 included the practical development of the feedback mechanism. Final design and content of the feedback mechanism (a safety survey) were verified by workshop participants, and cognitive interviews (n=28) were conducted with patients. RESULTS: Workshop participants identified that safety feedback mechanisms should be patient-centred, short and concise with clear signposting on how to complete, with an option to be anonymous and balanced between positive (safe) and negative (unsafe) experiences. The agreed feedback mechanism consisted of a survey split across 3 stages of the care transfer: departure, journey and arrival. Care across organisational boundaries was recognised as being complex, with healthcare professionals acknowledging the difficulty implementing changes that impact other organisations. Cognitive interview participants agreed the content of the survey was relevant but identified barriers to completion relating to the survey formatting and understanding of a care transfer. CONCLUSIONS: Participatory, codesign principles helped overcome differences in understandings of safety in the complex setting of care transfers when developing a safety survey. Practical barriers to the survey's usability and acceptability to patients were identified, resulting in a modified survey design. Further research is required to determine the usability and acceptability of the survey to patients and healthcare professionals, as well as identifying how governance structures should accommodate patient feedback when relating to multiple health or social care providers. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4947796/ /pubmed/27406641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011222 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Scott, Jason Heavey, Emily Waring, Justin Jones, Diana Dawson, Pamela Healthcare professional and patient codesign and validation of a mechanism for service users to feedback patient safety experiences following a care transfer: a qualitative study |
title | Healthcare professional and patient codesign and validation of a mechanism for service users to feedback patient safety experiences following a care transfer: a qualitative study |
title_full | Healthcare professional and patient codesign and validation of a mechanism for service users to feedback patient safety experiences following a care transfer: a qualitative study |
title_fullStr | Healthcare professional and patient codesign and validation of a mechanism for service users to feedback patient safety experiences following a care transfer: a qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Healthcare professional and patient codesign and validation of a mechanism for service users to feedback patient safety experiences following a care transfer: a qualitative study |
title_short | Healthcare professional and patient codesign and validation of a mechanism for service users to feedback patient safety experiences following a care transfer: a qualitative study |
title_sort | healthcare professional and patient codesign and validation of a mechanism for service users to feedback patient safety experiences following a care transfer: a qualitative study |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4947796/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27406641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011222 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scottjason healthcareprofessionalandpatientcodesignandvalidationofamechanismforserviceuserstofeedbackpatientsafetyexperiencesfollowingacaretransferaqualitativestudy AT heaveyemily healthcareprofessionalandpatientcodesignandvalidationofamechanismforserviceuserstofeedbackpatientsafetyexperiencesfollowingacaretransferaqualitativestudy AT waringjustin healthcareprofessionalandpatientcodesignandvalidationofamechanismforserviceuserstofeedbackpatientsafetyexperiencesfollowingacaretransferaqualitativestudy AT jonesdiana healthcareprofessionalandpatientcodesignandvalidationofamechanismforserviceuserstofeedbackpatientsafetyexperiencesfollowingacaretransferaqualitativestudy AT dawsonpamela healthcareprofessionalandpatientcodesignandvalidationofamechanismforserviceuserstofeedbackpatientsafetyexperiencesfollowingacaretransferaqualitativestudy |