Cargando…

Healthcare professional and patient codesign and validation of a mechanism for service users to feedback patient safety experiences following a care transfer: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a mechanism for patients to provide feedback on safety experiences following a care transfer between organisations. DESIGN: Qualitative study using participatory methods (codesign workshops) and cognitive interviews. Workshop data were analysed concurrently with pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scott, Jason, Heavey, Emily, Waring, Justin, Jones, Diana, Dawson, Pamela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4947796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27406641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011222
_version_ 1782443232878133248
author Scott, Jason
Heavey, Emily
Waring, Justin
Jones, Diana
Dawson, Pamela
author_facet Scott, Jason
Heavey, Emily
Waring, Justin
Jones, Diana
Dawson, Pamela
author_sort Scott, Jason
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a mechanism for patients to provide feedback on safety experiences following a care transfer between organisations. DESIGN: Qualitative study using participatory methods (codesign workshops) and cognitive interviews. Workshop data were analysed concurrently with participants, and cognitive interviews were thematically analysed using a deductive approach based on the developed feedback mechanism. PARTICIPANTS: Expert patients (n=5) and healthcare professionals (n=11) were recruited purposively to develop the feedback mechanism in 2 workshops. Workshop 1 explored principles underpinning safety feedback mechanisms, and workshop 2 included the practical development of the feedback mechanism. Final design and content of the feedback mechanism (a safety survey) were verified by workshop participants, and cognitive interviews (n=28) were conducted with patients. RESULTS: Workshop participants identified that safety feedback mechanisms should be patient-centred, short and concise with clear signposting on how to complete, with an option to be anonymous and balanced between positive (safe) and negative (unsafe) experiences. The agreed feedback mechanism consisted of a survey split across 3 stages of the care transfer: departure, journey and arrival. Care across organisational boundaries was recognised as being complex, with healthcare professionals acknowledging the difficulty implementing changes that impact other organisations. Cognitive interview participants agreed the content of the survey was relevant but identified barriers to completion relating to the survey formatting and understanding of a care transfer. CONCLUSIONS: Participatory, codesign principles helped overcome differences in understandings of safety in the complex setting of care transfers when developing a safety survey. Practical barriers to the survey's usability and acceptability to patients were identified, resulting in a modified survey design. Further research is required to determine the usability and acceptability of the survey to patients and healthcare professionals, as well as identifying how governance structures should accommodate patient feedback when relating to multiple health or social care providers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4947796
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49477962016-08-03 Healthcare professional and patient codesign and validation of a mechanism for service users to feedback patient safety experiences following a care transfer: a qualitative study Scott, Jason Heavey, Emily Waring, Justin Jones, Diana Dawson, Pamela BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a mechanism for patients to provide feedback on safety experiences following a care transfer between organisations. DESIGN: Qualitative study using participatory methods (codesign workshops) and cognitive interviews. Workshop data were analysed concurrently with participants, and cognitive interviews were thematically analysed using a deductive approach based on the developed feedback mechanism. PARTICIPANTS: Expert patients (n=5) and healthcare professionals (n=11) were recruited purposively to develop the feedback mechanism in 2 workshops. Workshop 1 explored principles underpinning safety feedback mechanisms, and workshop 2 included the practical development of the feedback mechanism. Final design and content of the feedback mechanism (a safety survey) were verified by workshop participants, and cognitive interviews (n=28) were conducted with patients. RESULTS: Workshop participants identified that safety feedback mechanisms should be patient-centred, short and concise with clear signposting on how to complete, with an option to be anonymous and balanced between positive (safe) and negative (unsafe) experiences. The agreed feedback mechanism consisted of a survey split across 3 stages of the care transfer: departure, journey and arrival. Care across organisational boundaries was recognised as being complex, with healthcare professionals acknowledging the difficulty implementing changes that impact other organisations. Cognitive interview participants agreed the content of the survey was relevant but identified barriers to completion relating to the survey formatting and understanding of a care transfer. CONCLUSIONS: Participatory, codesign principles helped overcome differences in understandings of safety in the complex setting of care transfers when developing a safety survey. Practical barriers to the survey's usability and acceptability to patients were identified, resulting in a modified survey design. Further research is required to determine the usability and acceptability of the survey to patients and healthcare professionals, as well as identifying how governance structures should accommodate patient feedback when relating to multiple health or social care providers. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4947796/ /pubmed/27406641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011222 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Scott, Jason
Heavey, Emily
Waring, Justin
Jones, Diana
Dawson, Pamela
Healthcare professional and patient codesign and validation of a mechanism for service users to feedback patient safety experiences following a care transfer: a qualitative study
title Healthcare professional and patient codesign and validation of a mechanism for service users to feedback patient safety experiences following a care transfer: a qualitative study
title_full Healthcare professional and patient codesign and validation of a mechanism for service users to feedback patient safety experiences following a care transfer: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Healthcare professional and patient codesign and validation of a mechanism for service users to feedback patient safety experiences following a care transfer: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Healthcare professional and patient codesign and validation of a mechanism for service users to feedback patient safety experiences following a care transfer: a qualitative study
title_short Healthcare professional and patient codesign and validation of a mechanism for service users to feedback patient safety experiences following a care transfer: a qualitative study
title_sort healthcare professional and patient codesign and validation of a mechanism for service users to feedback patient safety experiences following a care transfer: a qualitative study
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4947796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27406641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011222
work_keys_str_mv AT scottjason healthcareprofessionalandpatientcodesignandvalidationofamechanismforserviceuserstofeedbackpatientsafetyexperiencesfollowingacaretransferaqualitativestudy
AT heaveyemily healthcareprofessionalandpatientcodesignandvalidationofamechanismforserviceuserstofeedbackpatientsafetyexperiencesfollowingacaretransferaqualitativestudy
AT waringjustin healthcareprofessionalandpatientcodesignandvalidationofamechanismforserviceuserstofeedbackpatientsafetyexperiencesfollowingacaretransferaqualitativestudy
AT jonesdiana healthcareprofessionalandpatientcodesignandvalidationofamechanismforserviceuserstofeedbackpatientsafetyexperiencesfollowingacaretransferaqualitativestudy
AT dawsonpamela healthcareprofessionalandpatientcodesignandvalidationofamechanismforserviceuserstofeedbackpatientsafetyexperiencesfollowingacaretransferaqualitativestudy