Cargando…

Interest and preferences for using advanced physical activity tracking devices: results of a national cross-sectional survey

OBJECTIVES: Pedometers are an effective self-monitoring tool to increase users' physical activity. However, a range of advanced trackers that measure physical activity 24 hours per day have emerged (eg, Fitbit). The current study aims to determine people's current use, interest and prefere...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alley, Stephanie, Schoeppe, Stephanie, Guertler, Diana, Jennings, Cally, Duncan, Mitch J, Vandelanotte, Corneel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4947799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27388359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011243
_version_ 1782443233582776320
author Alley, Stephanie
Schoeppe, Stephanie
Guertler, Diana
Jennings, Cally
Duncan, Mitch J
Vandelanotte, Corneel
author_facet Alley, Stephanie
Schoeppe, Stephanie
Guertler, Diana
Jennings, Cally
Duncan, Mitch J
Vandelanotte, Corneel
author_sort Alley, Stephanie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Pedometers are an effective self-monitoring tool to increase users' physical activity. However, a range of advanced trackers that measure physical activity 24 hours per day have emerged (eg, Fitbit). The current study aims to determine people's current use, interest and preferences for advanced trackers. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional national telephone survey was conducted in Australia with 1349 respondents. OUTCOME MEASURES: Regression analyses were used to determine whether tracker interest and use, and use of advanced trackers over pedometers is a function of demographics. Preferences for tracker features and reasons for not wanting to wear a tracker are also presented. RESULTS: Over one-third of participants (35%) had used a tracker, and 16% are interested in using one. Multinomial regression (n=1257) revealed that the use of trackers was lower in males (OR=0.48, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.65), non-working participants (OR=0.43, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.61), participants with lower education (OR=0.52, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.72) and inactive participants (OR=0.52, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.70). Interest in using a tracker was higher in younger participants (OR=1.73, 95% CI 1.15 to 2.58). The most frequently used tracker was a pedometer (59%). Logistic regression (n=445) revealed that use of advanced trackers compared with pedometers was higher in males (OR=1.67, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.79) and younger participants (OR=2.96, 95% CI 1.71 to 5.13), and lower in inactive participants (OR=0.35, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.63). Over half of current or interested tracker users (53%) prefer to wear it on their wrist, 31% considered counting steps the most important function and 30% regarded accuracy as the most important characteristic. The main reasons for not wanting to use a tracker were, ‘I don't think it would help me’ (39%), and ‘I don't want to increase my activity’ (47%). CONCLUSIONS: Activity trackers are a promising tool to engage people in self-monitoring a physical activity. Trackers used in physical activity interventions should align with the preferences of target groups, and should be able to be worn on the wrist, measure steps and be accurate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4947799
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49477992016-08-03 Interest and preferences for using advanced physical activity tracking devices: results of a national cross-sectional survey Alley, Stephanie Schoeppe, Stephanie Guertler, Diana Jennings, Cally Duncan, Mitch J Vandelanotte, Corneel BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: Pedometers are an effective self-monitoring tool to increase users' physical activity. However, a range of advanced trackers that measure physical activity 24 hours per day have emerged (eg, Fitbit). The current study aims to determine people's current use, interest and preferences for advanced trackers. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional national telephone survey was conducted in Australia with 1349 respondents. OUTCOME MEASURES: Regression analyses were used to determine whether tracker interest and use, and use of advanced trackers over pedometers is a function of demographics. Preferences for tracker features and reasons for not wanting to wear a tracker are also presented. RESULTS: Over one-third of participants (35%) had used a tracker, and 16% are interested in using one. Multinomial regression (n=1257) revealed that the use of trackers was lower in males (OR=0.48, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.65), non-working participants (OR=0.43, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.61), participants with lower education (OR=0.52, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.72) and inactive participants (OR=0.52, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.70). Interest in using a tracker was higher in younger participants (OR=1.73, 95% CI 1.15 to 2.58). The most frequently used tracker was a pedometer (59%). Logistic regression (n=445) revealed that use of advanced trackers compared with pedometers was higher in males (OR=1.67, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.79) and younger participants (OR=2.96, 95% CI 1.71 to 5.13), and lower in inactive participants (OR=0.35, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.63). Over half of current or interested tracker users (53%) prefer to wear it on their wrist, 31% considered counting steps the most important function and 30% regarded accuracy as the most important characteristic. The main reasons for not wanting to use a tracker were, ‘I don't think it would help me’ (39%), and ‘I don't want to increase my activity’ (47%). CONCLUSIONS: Activity trackers are a promising tool to engage people in self-monitoring a physical activity. Trackers used in physical activity interventions should align with the preferences of target groups, and should be able to be worn on the wrist, measure steps and be accurate. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4947799/ /pubmed/27388359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011243 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Public Health
Alley, Stephanie
Schoeppe, Stephanie
Guertler, Diana
Jennings, Cally
Duncan, Mitch J
Vandelanotte, Corneel
Interest and preferences for using advanced physical activity tracking devices: results of a national cross-sectional survey
title Interest and preferences for using advanced physical activity tracking devices: results of a national cross-sectional survey
title_full Interest and preferences for using advanced physical activity tracking devices: results of a national cross-sectional survey
title_fullStr Interest and preferences for using advanced physical activity tracking devices: results of a national cross-sectional survey
title_full_unstemmed Interest and preferences for using advanced physical activity tracking devices: results of a national cross-sectional survey
title_short Interest and preferences for using advanced physical activity tracking devices: results of a national cross-sectional survey
title_sort interest and preferences for using advanced physical activity tracking devices: results of a national cross-sectional survey
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4947799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27388359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011243
work_keys_str_mv AT alleystephanie interestandpreferencesforusingadvancedphysicalactivitytrackingdevicesresultsofanationalcrosssectionalsurvey
AT schoeppestephanie interestandpreferencesforusingadvancedphysicalactivitytrackingdevicesresultsofanationalcrosssectionalsurvey
AT guertlerdiana interestandpreferencesforusingadvancedphysicalactivitytrackingdevicesresultsofanationalcrosssectionalsurvey
AT jenningscally interestandpreferencesforusingadvancedphysicalactivitytrackingdevicesresultsofanationalcrosssectionalsurvey
AT duncanmitchj interestandpreferencesforusingadvancedphysicalactivitytrackingdevicesresultsofanationalcrosssectionalsurvey
AT vandelanottecorneel interestandpreferencesforusingadvancedphysicalactivitytrackingdevicesresultsofanationalcrosssectionalsurvey