Cargando…

Concurrent vaccination against equine influenza and equine herpesvirus – a practical approach

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of information concerning concurrent administration of vaccines against equine influenza virus (EIV) and equine herpesvirus 1 and 4 (EHV‐1/4). OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to determine the impact of the concurrent use of EIV and EHV‐1/4 vaccines in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gildea, Sarah, Sanchez Higgins, Maria Jose, Johnson, Gillian, Walsh, Cathal, Cullinane, Ann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4947937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27169603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.12396
_version_ 1782443254927589376
author Gildea, Sarah
Sanchez Higgins, Maria Jose
Johnson, Gillian
Walsh, Cathal
Cullinane, Ann
author_facet Gildea, Sarah
Sanchez Higgins, Maria Jose
Johnson, Gillian
Walsh, Cathal
Cullinane, Ann
author_sort Gildea, Sarah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a lack of information concerning concurrent administration of vaccines against equine influenza virus (EIV) and equine herpesvirus 1 and 4 (EHV‐1/4). OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to determine the impact of the concurrent use of EIV and EHV‐1/4 vaccines in Thoroughbred racehorses on their humoral immune response to EIV. METHODS: This study was carried out on a population of 30 horses using an inactivated whole‐virus EIV vaccine and an inactivated EHV‐1/4 vaccine. Horses were randomly allocated to vaccination group A or B. Horses in group A were vaccinated against EIV and EHV‐1/4 2 weeks apart. Horses in group B were vaccinated against EIV and EHV‐1/4 on the same day. Whole‐blood samples were collected on the day of vaccination and 2 weeks and 6 weeks post‐vaccination. Antibody levels against EIV and EHV‐1/4 were measured using the single radial haemolysis and serum neutralisation test, respectively. RESULTS: The pattern of EIV antibody response post‐vaccination was similar for both groups. Highest EIV antibody levels were recorded 2 weeks post‐vaccination, and a significant decrease in antibody level was observed 4 weeks later. Horses in group B demonstrated a significantly higher EIV antibody response post‐vaccination. Overall, there was no significant difference in EHV‐1/4 antibody response between the two groups post‐vaccination. CONCLUSION: In this study, concurrent vaccination against EIV and EHV‐1/4 increased the response to EIV and did not compromise the humoral immune response to EHV‐1/4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4947937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49479372016-09-01 Concurrent vaccination against equine influenza and equine herpesvirus – a practical approach Gildea, Sarah Sanchez Higgins, Maria Jose Johnson, Gillian Walsh, Cathal Cullinane, Ann Influenza Other Respir Viruses Original Article BACKGROUND: There is a lack of information concerning concurrent administration of vaccines against equine influenza virus (EIV) and equine herpesvirus 1 and 4 (EHV‐1/4). OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to determine the impact of the concurrent use of EIV and EHV‐1/4 vaccines in Thoroughbred racehorses on their humoral immune response to EIV. METHODS: This study was carried out on a population of 30 horses using an inactivated whole‐virus EIV vaccine and an inactivated EHV‐1/4 vaccine. Horses were randomly allocated to vaccination group A or B. Horses in group A were vaccinated against EIV and EHV‐1/4 2 weeks apart. Horses in group B were vaccinated against EIV and EHV‐1/4 on the same day. Whole‐blood samples were collected on the day of vaccination and 2 weeks and 6 weeks post‐vaccination. Antibody levels against EIV and EHV‐1/4 were measured using the single radial haemolysis and serum neutralisation test, respectively. RESULTS: The pattern of EIV antibody response post‐vaccination was similar for both groups. Highest EIV antibody levels were recorded 2 weeks post‐vaccination, and a significant decrease in antibody level was observed 4 weeks later. Horses in group B demonstrated a significantly higher EIV antibody response post‐vaccination. Overall, there was no significant difference in EHV‐1/4 antibody response between the two groups post‐vaccination. CONCLUSION: In this study, concurrent vaccination against EIV and EHV‐1/4 increased the response to EIV and did not compromise the humoral immune response to EHV‐1/4. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-07-02 2016-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4947937/ /pubmed/27169603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.12396 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gildea, Sarah
Sanchez Higgins, Maria Jose
Johnson, Gillian
Walsh, Cathal
Cullinane, Ann
Concurrent vaccination against equine influenza and equine herpesvirus – a practical approach
title Concurrent vaccination against equine influenza and equine herpesvirus – a practical approach
title_full Concurrent vaccination against equine influenza and equine herpesvirus – a practical approach
title_fullStr Concurrent vaccination against equine influenza and equine herpesvirus – a practical approach
title_full_unstemmed Concurrent vaccination against equine influenza and equine herpesvirus – a practical approach
title_short Concurrent vaccination against equine influenza and equine herpesvirus – a practical approach
title_sort concurrent vaccination against equine influenza and equine herpesvirus – a practical approach
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4947937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27169603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.12396
work_keys_str_mv AT gildeasarah concurrentvaccinationagainstequineinfluenzaandequineherpesvirusapracticalapproach
AT sanchezhigginsmariajose concurrentvaccinationagainstequineinfluenzaandequineherpesvirusapracticalapproach
AT johnsongillian concurrentvaccinationagainstequineinfluenzaandequineherpesvirusapracticalapproach
AT walshcathal concurrentvaccinationagainstequineinfluenzaandequineherpesvirusapracticalapproach
AT cullinaneann concurrentvaccinationagainstequineinfluenzaandequineherpesvirusapracticalapproach