Cargando…

The frequency of influenza and bacterial coinfection: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

AIM: Coinfecting bacterial pathogens are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in influenza. However, there remains a paucity of literature on the magnitude of coinfection in influenza patients. METHOD: A systematic search of MeSH, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and PubMed was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klein, Eili Y., Monteforte, Bradley, Gupta, Alisha, Jiang, Wendi, May, Larissa, Hsieh, Yu‐Hsiang, Dugas, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4947938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27232677
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.12398
_version_ 1782443255154081792
author Klein, Eili Y.
Monteforte, Bradley
Gupta, Alisha
Jiang, Wendi
May, Larissa
Hsieh, Yu‐Hsiang
Dugas, Andrea
author_facet Klein, Eili Y.
Monteforte, Bradley
Gupta, Alisha
Jiang, Wendi
May, Larissa
Hsieh, Yu‐Hsiang
Dugas, Andrea
author_sort Klein, Eili Y.
collection PubMed
description AIM: Coinfecting bacterial pathogens are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in influenza. However, there remains a paucity of literature on the magnitude of coinfection in influenza patients. METHOD: A systematic search of MeSH, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and PubMed was performed. Studies of humans in which all individuals had laboratory confirmed influenza, and all individuals were tested for an array of common bacterial species, met inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Twenty‐seven studies including 3215 participants met all inclusion criteria. Common etiologies were defined from a subset of eight articles. There was high heterogeneity in the results (I (2) = 95%), with reported coinfection rates ranging from 2% to 65%. Although only a subset of papers were responsible for observed heterogeneity, subanalyses and meta‐regression analysis found no study characteristic that was significantly associated with coinfection. The most common coinfecting species were Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus, which accounted for 35% (95% CI, 14%–56%) and 28% (95% CI, 16%–40%) of infections, respectively; a wide range of other pathogens caused the remaining infections. An assessment of bias suggested that lack of small‐study publications may have biased the results. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of coinfection in the published studies included in this review suggests that although providers should consider possible bacterial coinfection in all patients hospitalized with influenza, they should not assume all patients are coinfected and be sure to properly treat underlying viral processes. Further, high heterogeneity suggests additional large‐scale studies are needed to better understand the etiology of influenza bacterial coinfection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4947938
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49479382016-09-01 The frequency of influenza and bacterial coinfection: a systematic review and meta‐analysis Klein, Eili Y. Monteforte, Bradley Gupta, Alisha Jiang, Wendi May, Larissa Hsieh, Yu‐Hsiang Dugas, Andrea Influenza Other Respir Viruses Systematic Review AIM: Coinfecting bacterial pathogens are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in influenza. However, there remains a paucity of literature on the magnitude of coinfection in influenza patients. METHOD: A systematic search of MeSH, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and PubMed was performed. Studies of humans in which all individuals had laboratory confirmed influenza, and all individuals were tested for an array of common bacterial species, met inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Twenty‐seven studies including 3215 participants met all inclusion criteria. Common etiologies were defined from a subset of eight articles. There was high heterogeneity in the results (I (2) = 95%), with reported coinfection rates ranging from 2% to 65%. Although only a subset of papers were responsible for observed heterogeneity, subanalyses and meta‐regression analysis found no study characteristic that was significantly associated with coinfection. The most common coinfecting species were Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus, which accounted for 35% (95% CI, 14%–56%) and 28% (95% CI, 16%–40%) of infections, respectively; a wide range of other pathogens caused the remaining infections. An assessment of bias suggested that lack of small‐study publications may have biased the results. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of coinfection in the published studies included in this review suggests that although providers should consider possible bacterial coinfection in all patients hospitalized with influenza, they should not assume all patients are coinfected and be sure to properly treat underlying viral processes. Further, high heterogeneity suggests additional large‐scale studies are needed to better understand the etiology of influenza bacterial coinfection. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-06-24 2016-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4947938/ /pubmed/27232677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.12398 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Klein, Eili Y.
Monteforte, Bradley
Gupta, Alisha
Jiang, Wendi
May, Larissa
Hsieh, Yu‐Hsiang
Dugas, Andrea
The frequency of influenza and bacterial coinfection: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title The frequency of influenza and bacterial coinfection: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full The frequency of influenza and bacterial coinfection: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr The frequency of influenza and bacterial coinfection: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed The frequency of influenza and bacterial coinfection: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short The frequency of influenza and bacterial coinfection: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort frequency of influenza and bacterial coinfection: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4947938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27232677
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.12398
work_keys_str_mv AT kleineiliy thefrequencyofinfluenzaandbacterialcoinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT montefortebradley thefrequencyofinfluenzaandbacterialcoinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT guptaalisha thefrequencyofinfluenzaandbacterialcoinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jiangwendi thefrequencyofinfluenzaandbacterialcoinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT maylarissa thefrequencyofinfluenzaandbacterialcoinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hsiehyuhsiang thefrequencyofinfluenzaandbacterialcoinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dugasandrea thefrequencyofinfluenzaandbacterialcoinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kleineiliy frequencyofinfluenzaandbacterialcoinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT montefortebradley frequencyofinfluenzaandbacterialcoinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT guptaalisha frequencyofinfluenzaandbacterialcoinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jiangwendi frequencyofinfluenzaandbacterialcoinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT maylarissa frequencyofinfluenzaandbacterialcoinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hsiehyuhsiang frequencyofinfluenzaandbacterialcoinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dugasandrea frequencyofinfluenzaandbacterialcoinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis