Cargando…
Bilateral posterior cervical cages provide biomechanical stability: assessment of stand-alone and supplemental fixation for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
INTRODUCTION: Supplemental posterior instrumentation has been widely used to enhance stability and improve fusion rates in higher risk patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). These typically involve posterior lateral mass or pedicle screw fixation with significant inheren...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4948702/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27471414 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S109588 |
_version_ | 1782443316024967168 |
---|---|
author | Voronov, Leonard I Siemionow, Krzysztof B Havey, Robert M Carandang, Gerard Phillips, Frank M Patwardhan, Avinash G |
author_facet | Voronov, Leonard I Siemionow, Krzysztof B Havey, Robert M Carandang, Gerard Phillips, Frank M Patwardhan, Avinash G |
author_sort | Voronov, Leonard I |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Supplemental posterior instrumentation has been widely used to enhance stability and improve fusion rates in higher risk patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). These typically involve posterior lateral mass or pedicle screw fixation with significant inherent risks and morbidities. More recently, cervical cages placed bilaterally between the facet joints (posterior cervical cages) have been used as a less disruptive alternative for posterior fixation. The purpose of this study was to compare the stability achieved by both posterior cages and ACDF at a single motion segment and determine the stability achieved with posterior cervical cages used as an adjunct to single- and multilevel ACDF. METHODS: Seven cadaveric cervical spine (C2–T1) specimens were tested in the following sequence: intact, C5–C6 bilateral posterior cages, C6–C7 plated ACDF with and without posterior cages, and C3–C5 plated ACDF with and without posterior cages. Range of motion in flexion–extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation was measured for each condition under moment loading up to ±1.5 Nm. RESULTS: All fusion constructs significantly reduced the range of motion compared to intact in flexion–extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation (P<0.05). Similar stability was achieved with bilateral posterior cages and plated ACDF at a single level. Posterior cages, when placed as an adjunct to ACDF, further reduced range of motion in both single- and multilevel constructs (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The biomechanical effectiveness of bilateral posterior cages in limiting cervical segmental motion is comparable to single-level plated ACDF. Furthermore, supplementation of single- and multilevel ACDF with posterior cervical cages provided a significant increase in stability and therefore may be a potential, minimally disruptive option for supplemental fixation for improving ACDF fusion rates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4948702 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49487022016-07-28 Bilateral posterior cervical cages provide biomechanical stability: assessment of stand-alone and supplemental fixation for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion Voronov, Leonard I Siemionow, Krzysztof B Havey, Robert M Carandang, Gerard Phillips, Frank M Patwardhan, Avinash G Med Devices (Auckl) Original Research INTRODUCTION: Supplemental posterior instrumentation has been widely used to enhance stability and improve fusion rates in higher risk patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). These typically involve posterior lateral mass or pedicle screw fixation with significant inherent risks and morbidities. More recently, cervical cages placed bilaterally between the facet joints (posterior cervical cages) have been used as a less disruptive alternative for posterior fixation. The purpose of this study was to compare the stability achieved by both posterior cages and ACDF at a single motion segment and determine the stability achieved with posterior cervical cages used as an adjunct to single- and multilevel ACDF. METHODS: Seven cadaveric cervical spine (C2–T1) specimens were tested in the following sequence: intact, C5–C6 bilateral posterior cages, C6–C7 plated ACDF with and without posterior cages, and C3–C5 plated ACDF with and without posterior cages. Range of motion in flexion–extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation was measured for each condition under moment loading up to ±1.5 Nm. RESULTS: All fusion constructs significantly reduced the range of motion compared to intact in flexion–extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation (P<0.05). Similar stability was achieved with bilateral posterior cages and plated ACDF at a single level. Posterior cages, when placed as an adjunct to ACDF, further reduced range of motion in both single- and multilevel constructs (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The biomechanical effectiveness of bilateral posterior cages in limiting cervical segmental motion is comparable to single-level plated ACDF. Furthermore, supplementation of single- and multilevel ACDF with posterior cervical cages provided a significant increase in stability and therefore may be a potential, minimally disruptive option for supplemental fixation for improving ACDF fusion rates. Dove Medical Press 2016-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4948702/ /pubmed/27471414 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S109588 Text en © 2016 Voronov et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Voronov, Leonard I Siemionow, Krzysztof B Havey, Robert M Carandang, Gerard Phillips, Frank M Patwardhan, Avinash G Bilateral posterior cervical cages provide biomechanical stability: assessment of stand-alone and supplemental fixation for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion |
title | Bilateral posterior cervical cages provide biomechanical stability: assessment of stand-alone and supplemental fixation for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion |
title_full | Bilateral posterior cervical cages provide biomechanical stability: assessment of stand-alone and supplemental fixation for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion |
title_fullStr | Bilateral posterior cervical cages provide biomechanical stability: assessment of stand-alone and supplemental fixation for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion |
title_full_unstemmed | Bilateral posterior cervical cages provide biomechanical stability: assessment of stand-alone and supplemental fixation for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion |
title_short | Bilateral posterior cervical cages provide biomechanical stability: assessment of stand-alone and supplemental fixation for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion |
title_sort | bilateral posterior cervical cages provide biomechanical stability: assessment of stand-alone and supplemental fixation for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4948702/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27471414 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S109588 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT voronovleonardi bilateralposteriorcervicalcagesprovidebiomechanicalstabilityassessmentofstandaloneandsupplementalfixationforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion AT siemionowkrzysztofb bilateralposteriorcervicalcagesprovidebiomechanicalstabilityassessmentofstandaloneandsupplementalfixationforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion AT haveyrobertm bilateralposteriorcervicalcagesprovidebiomechanicalstabilityassessmentofstandaloneandsupplementalfixationforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion AT carandanggerard bilateralposteriorcervicalcagesprovidebiomechanicalstabilityassessmentofstandaloneandsupplementalfixationforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion AT phillipsfrankm bilateralposteriorcervicalcagesprovidebiomechanicalstabilityassessmentofstandaloneandsupplementalfixationforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion AT patwardhanavinashg bilateralposteriorcervicalcagesprovidebiomechanicalstabilityassessmentofstandaloneandsupplementalfixationforanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion |