Cargando…

Baseline Oral 5-ASA Use and Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide Foam in Patients with Ulcerative Proctitis and Ulcerative Proctosigmoiditis: Analysis of 2 Phase 3 Studies

BACKGROUND: Rectal budesonide foam is a second-generation corticosteroid efficacious for active mild to moderate ulcerative proctitis and ulcerative proctosigmoiditis. This subgroup analysis examined the impact of baseline oral 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) on the efficacy and safety of budesonide f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bosworth, Brian P., Sandborn, William J., Rubin, David T., Harper, Joseph R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4949012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27416045
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MIB.0000000000000860
_version_ 1782443366100762624
author Bosworth, Brian P.
Sandborn, William J.
Rubin, David T.
Harper, Joseph R.
author_facet Bosworth, Brian P.
Sandborn, William J.
Rubin, David T.
Harper, Joseph R.
author_sort Bosworth, Brian P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rectal budesonide foam is a second-generation corticosteroid efficacious for active mild to moderate ulcerative proctitis and ulcerative proctosigmoiditis. This subgroup analysis examined the impact of baseline oral 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) on the efficacy and safety of budesonide foam in patients with mild to moderate ulcerative proctitis or ulcerative proctosigmoiditis. METHODS: Patients received budesonide foam 2 mg/25 mL twice daily for 2 weeks, then once daily for 4 weeks, or placebo, with or without continued stable dosing of baseline oral 5-ASAs, for remission induction at week 6 (primary endpoint) in 2 identically designed, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 studies. RESULTS: Of the 267 and 279 patients randomized to treatment with budesonide foam or placebo (pooled population), 55.1% and 55.2%, respectively, reported baseline 5-ASA use. A significantly greater percentage of patients achieved remission with budesonide foam versus placebo, either with (42.2% versus 31.8%, respectively; P = 0.03) or without (40.0% versus 14.4%; P < 0.0001) baseline 5-ASA use at week 6. A significantly greater percentage of patients achieved a Modified Mayo Disease Activity Index rectal bleeding subscale score of 0 at week 6, regardless of baseline 5-ASA use (5-ASA, 50.3% versus 35.7%; P = 0.003: no 5-ASA, 45.8% versus 19.2%; P < 0.0001). The frequency of adverse events was comparable between groups, regardless of baseline 5-ASA use. CONCLUSIONS: Budesonide foam was efficacious and safe for induction of remission of mild to moderate ulcerative proctitis and ulcerative proctosigmoiditis in patients receiving oral 5-ASA at baseline and those who were not (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01008410 and NCT01008423).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4949012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49490122016-08-03 Baseline Oral 5-ASA Use and Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide Foam in Patients with Ulcerative Proctitis and Ulcerative Proctosigmoiditis: Analysis of 2 Phase 3 Studies Bosworth, Brian P. Sandborn, William J. Rubin, David T. Harper, Joseph R. Inflamm Bowel Dis Original Clinical Articles BACKGROUND: Rectal budesonide foam is a second-generation corticosteroid efficacious for active mild to moderate ulcerative proctitis and ulcerative proctosigmoiditis. This subgroup analysis examined the impact of baseline oral 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) on the efficacy and safety of budesonide foam in patients with mild to moderate ulcerative proctitis or ulcerative proctosigmoiditis. METHODS: Patients received budesonide foam 2 mg/25 mL twice daily for 2 weeks, then once daily for 4 weeks, or placebo, with or without continued stable dosing of baseline oral 5-ASAs, for remission induction at week 6 (primary endpoint) in 2 identically designed, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 studies. RESULTS: Of the 267 and 279 patients randomized to treatment with budesonide foam or placebo (pooled population), 55.1% and 55.2%, respectively, reported baseline 5-ASA use. A significantly greater percentage of patients achieved remission with budesonide foam versus placebo, either with (42.2% versus 31.8%, respectively; P = 0.03) or without (40.0% versus 14.4%; P < 0.0001) baseline 5-ASA use at week 6. A significantly greater percentage of patients achieved a Modified Mayo Disease Activity Index rectal bleeding subscale score of 0 at week 6, regardless of baseline 5-ASA use (5-ASA, 50.3% versus 35.7%; P = 0.003: no 5-ASA, 45.8% versus 19.2%; P < 0.0001). The frequency of adverse events was comparable between groups, regardless of baseline 5-ASA use. CONCLUSIONS: Budesonide foam was efficacious and safe for induction of remission of mild to moderate ulcerative proctitis and ulcerative proctosigmoiditis in patients receiving oral 5-ASA at baseline and those who were not (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01008410 and NCT01008423). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016-07-13 2016-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4949012/ /pubmed/27416045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MIB.0000000000000860 Text en Copyright © 2016 Crohn's & Colitis Foundation of America, Inc. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
spellingShingle Original Clinical Articles
Bosworth, Brian P.
Sandborn, William J.
Rubin, David T.
Harper, Joseph R.
Baseline Oral 5-ASA Use and Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide Foam in Patients with Ulcerative Proctitis and Ulcerative Proctosigmoiditis: Analysis of 2 Phase 3 Studies
title Baseline Oral 5-ASA Use and Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide Foam in Patients with Ulcerative Proctitis and Ulcerative Proctosigmoiditis: Analysis of 2 Phase 3 Studies
title_full Baseline Oral 5-ASA Use and Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide Foam in Patients with Ulcerative Proctitis and Ulcerative Proctosigmoiditis: Analysis of 2 Phase 3 Studies
title_fullStr Baseline Oral 5-ASA Use and Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide Foam in Patients with Ulcerative Proctitis and Ulcerative Proctosigmoiditis: Analysis of 2 Phase 3 Studies
title_full_unstemmed Baseline Oral 5-ASA Use and Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide Foam in Patients with Ulcerative Proctitis and Ulcerative Proctosigmoiditis: Analysis of 2 Phase 3 Studies
title_short Baseline Oral 5-ASA Use and Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide Foam in Patients with Ulcerative Proctitis and Ulcerative Proctosigmoiditis: Analysis of 2 Phase 3 Studies
title_sort baseline oral 5-asa use and efficacy and safety of budesonide foam in patients with ulcerative proctitis and ulcerative proctosigmoiditis: analysis of 2 phase 3 studies
topic Original Clinical Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4949012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27416045
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MIB.0000000000000860
work_keys_str_mv AT bosworthbrianp baselineoral5asauseandefficacyandsafetyofbudesonidefoaminpatientswithulcerativeproctitisandulcerativeproctosigmoiditisanalysisof2phase3studies
AT sandbornwilliamj baselineoral5asauseandefficacyandsafetyofbudesonidefoaminpatientswithulcerativeproctitisandulcerativeproctosigmoiditisanalysisof2phase3studies
AT rubindavidt baselineoral5asauseandefficacyandsafetyofbudesonidefoaminpatientswithulcerativeproctitisandulcerativeproctosigmoiditisanalysisof2phase3studies
AT harperjosephr baselineoral5asauseandefficacyandsafetyofbudesonidefoaminpatientswithulcerativeproctitisandulcerativeproctosigmoiditisanalysisof2phase3studies