Cargando…
Devices for In situ Development of Non-disturbed Oral Biofilm. A Systematic Review
Objective: The aim of this review was to assess the types of devices used for in situ development of oral biofilm analyzed microbiologically. Materials and Methods: A systematic search of the literature was conducted to identify all in situ studies of oral biofilm which used an oral device; the Ovid...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4949230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27486437 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01055 |
_version_ | 1782443389630808064 |
---|---|
author | Prada-López, Isabel Quintas, Víctor Vilaboa, Carlos Suárez-Quintanilla, David Tomás, Inmaculada |
author_facet | Prada-López, Isabel Quintas, Víctor Vilaboa, Carlos Suárez-Quintanilla, David Tomás, Inmaculada |
author_sort | Prada-López, Isabel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: The aim of this review was to assess the types of devices used for in situ development of oral biofilm analyzed microbiologically. Materials and Methods: A systematic search of the literature was conducted to identify all in situ studies of oral biofilm which used an oral device; the Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE databases complemented with manual search were used. Specific devices used to microbiologically analyze oral biofilm in adults were included. After reading of the selected full texts, devices were identified and classified according to the oral cavity zone and manufacturing material. The “ideal” characteristics were analyzed in every group. Results: The search provided 787 abstracts, of which 111 papers were included. The devices used in these studies were classified as palatal, lingual or buccal. The last group was sub-classified in six groups based on the material of the device. Considering the analyzed characteristics, the thermoplastic devices and the Intraoral Device of Overlaid Disk-holding Splints (IDODS) presented more advantages than limitations. Conclusions: Buccal devices were the most commonly used for the study of in situ biofilm. The majority of buccal devices seemed to slightly affect the volunteer's comfort, the IDODS being the closest to the “ideal” model. Clinical Relevance: New devices for in situ oral biofilm microbiological studies should take into account the possible effect of their design on the volunteer's comfort and biofilm formation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4949230 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49492302016-08-02 Devices for In situ Development of Non-disturbed Oral Biofilm. A Systematic Review Prada-López, Isabel Quintas, Víctor Vilaboa, Carlos Suárez-Quintanilla, David Tomás, Inmaculada Front Microbiol Public Health Objective: The aim of this review was to assess the types of devices used for in situ development of oral biofilm analyzed microbiologically. Materials and Methods: A systematic search of the literature was conducted to identify all in situ studies of oral biofilm which used an oral device; the Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE databases complemented with manual search were used. Specific devices used to microbiologically analyze oral biofilm in adults were included. After reading of the selected full texts, devices were identified and classified according to the oral cavity zone and manufacturing material. The “ideal” characteristics were analyzed in every group. Results: The search provided 787 abstracts, of which 111 papers were included. The devices used in these studies were classified as palatal, lingual or buccal. The last group was sub-classified in six groups based on the material of the device. Considering the analyzed characteristics, the thermoplastic devices and the Intraoral Device of Overlaid Disk-holding Splints (IDODS) presented more advantages than limitations. Conclusions: Buccal devices were the most commonly used for the study of in situ biofilm. The majority of buccal devices seemed to slightly affect the volunteer's comfort, the IDODS being the closest to the “ideal” model. Clinical Relevance: New devices for in situ oral biofilm microbiological studies should take into account the possible effect of their design on the volunteer's comfort and biofilm formation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4949230/ /pubmed/27486437 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01055 Text en Copyright © 2016 Prada-López, Quintas, Vilaboa, Suárez-Quintanilla and Tomás. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Prada-López, Isabel Quintas, Víctor Vilaboa, Carlos Suárez-Quintanilla, David Tomás, Inmaculada Devices for In situ Development of Non-disturbed Oral Biofilm. A Systematic Review |
title | Devices for In situ Development of Non-disturbed Oral Biofilm. A Systematic Review |
title_full | Devices for In situ Development of Non-disturbed Oral Biofilm. A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Devices for In situ Development of Non-disturbed Oral Biofilm. A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Devices for In situ Development of Non-disturbed Oral Biofilm. A Systematic Review |
title_short | Devices for In situ Development of Non-disturbed Oral Biofilm. A Systematic Review |
title_sort | devices for in situ development of non-disturbed oral biofilm. a systematic review |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4949230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27486437 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01055 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pradalopezisabel devicesforinsitudevelopmentofnondisturbedoralbiofilmasystematicreview AT quintasvictor devicesforinsitudevelopmentofnondisturbedoralbiofilmasystematicreview AT vilaboacarlos devicesforinsitudevelopmentofnondisturbedoralbiofilmasystematicreview AT suarezquintanilladavid devicesforinsitudevelopmentofnondisturbedoralbiofilmasystematicreview AT tomasinmaculada devicesforinsitudevelopmentofnondisturbedoralbiofilmasystematicreview |