Cargando…

What to compare and how: Comparative transcriptomics for Evo‐Devo

Evolutionary developmental biology has grown historically from the capacity to relate patterns of evolution in anatomy to patterns of evolution of expression of specific genes, whether between very distantly related species, or very closely related species or populations. Scaling up such studies by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roux, Julien, Rosikiewicz, Marta, Robinson‐Rechavi, Marc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4949521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25864439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.22618
_version_ 1782443443912441856
author Roux, Julien
Rosikiewicz, Marta
Robinson‐Rechavi, Marc
author_facet Roux, Julien
Rosikiewicz, Marta
Robinson‐Rechavi, Marc
author_sort Roux, Julien
collection PubMed
description Evolutionary developmental biology has grown historically from the capacity to relate patterns of evolution in anatomy to patterns of evolution of expression of specific genes, whether between very distantly related species, or very closely related species or populations. Scaling up such studies by taking advantage of modern transcriptomics brings promising improvements, allowing us to estimate the overall impact and molecular mechanisms of convergence, constraint or innovation in anatomy and development. But it also presents major challenges, including the computational definitions of anatomical homology and of organ function, the criteria for the comparison of developmental stages, the annotation of transcriptomics data to proper anatomical and developmental terms, and the statistical methods to compare transcriptomic data between species to highlight significant conservation or changes. In this article, we review these challenges, and the ongoing efforts to address them, which are emerging from bioinformatics work on ontologies, evolutionary statistics, and data curation, with a focus on their implementation in the context of the development of our database Bgee (http://bgee.org). J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.) 324B: 372–382, 2015. © 2015 The Authors. J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.) published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4949521
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49495212016-07-28 What to compare and how: Comparative transcriptomics for Evo‐Devo Roux, Julien Rosikiewicz, Marta Robinson‐Rechavi, Marc J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol Commentary and Perspective Evolutionary developmental biology has grown historically from the capacity to relate patterns of evolution in anatomy to patterns of evolution of expression of specific genes, whether between very distantly related species, or very closely related species or populations. Scaling up such studies by taking advantage of modern transcriptomics brings promising improvements, allowing us to estimate the overall impact and molecular mechanisms of convergence, constraint or innovation in anatomy and development. But it also presents major challenges, including the computational definitions of anatomical homology and of organ function, the criteria for the comparison of developmental stages, the annotation of transcriptomics data to proper anatomical and developmental terms, and the statistical methods to compare transcriptomic data between species to highlight significant conservation or changes. In this article, we review these challenges, and the ongoing efforts to address them, which are emerging from bioinformatics work on ontologies, evolutionary statistics, and data curation, with a focus on their implementation in the context of the development of our database Bgee (http://bgee.org). J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.) 324B: 372–382, 2015. © 2015 The Authors. J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.) published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-06-15 2015-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4949521/ /pubmed/25864439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.22618 Text en © 2015 The Authors. J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.) published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Commentary and Perspective
Roux, Julien
Rosikiewicz, Marta
Robinson‐Rechavi, Marc
What to compare and how: Comparative transcriptomics for Evo‐Devo
title What to compare and how: Comparative transcriptomics for Evo‐Devo
title_full What to compare and how: Comparative transcriptomics for Evo‐Devo
title_fullStr What to compare and how: Comparative transcriptomics for Evo‐Devo
title_full_unstemmed What to compare and how: Comparative transcriptomics for Evo‐Devo
title_short What to compare and how: Comparative transcriptomics for Evo‐Devo
title_sort what to compare and how: comparative transcriptomics for evo‐devo
topic Commentary and Perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4949521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25864439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.22618
work_keys_str_mv AT rouxjulien whattocompareandhowcomparativetranscriptomicsforevodevo
AT rosikiewiczmarta whattocompareandhowcomparativetranscriptomicsforevodevo
AT robinsonrechavimarc whattocompareandhowcomparativetranscriptomicsforevodevo