Cargando…

Prevalence of defined ultrasound findings of unknown significance at the second trimester fetal anomaly scan and their association with adverse pregnancy outcomes: the Welsh study of mothers and babies population‐based cohort

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article was to estimate the population prevalence of seven defined ultrasound findings of uncertain significance (‘markers’) in the second trimester and the associated risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. METHOD: A prospective record‐linked cohort study of 30 078 pregnant w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hurt, Lisa, Wright, Melissa, Dunstan, Frank, Thomas, Susan, Brook, Fiona, Morris, Susan, Tucker, David, Wills, Marilyn Ann, Davies, Colin, John, Gareth, Fone, David, Paranjothy, Shantini
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4949529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26475362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.4708
_version_ 1782443445547171840
author Hurt, Lisa
Wright, Melissa
Dunstan, Frank
Thomas, Susan
Brook, Fiona
Morris, Susan
Tucker, David
Wills, Marilyn Ann
Davies, Colin
John, Gareth
Fone, David
Paranjothy, Shantini
author_facet Hurt, Lisa
Wright, Melissa
Dunstan, Frank
Thomas, Susan
Brook, Fiona
Morris, Susan
Tucker, David
Wills, Marilyn Ann
Davies, Colin
John, Gareth
Fone, David
Paranjothy, Shantini
author_sort Hurt, Lisa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article was to estimate the population prevalence of seven defined ultrasound findings of uncertain significance (‘markers’) in the second trimester and the associated risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. METHOD: A prospective record‐linked cohort study of 30 078 pregnant women who had second trimester anomaly scans between July 2008 and March 2011 in Wales was conducted. RESULTS: The prevalence of markers ranged from 43.7 per 1000 singleton pregnancies for cardiac echogenic foci [95% confidence interval (CI): 38.8, 51.1] to 0.6 for mild‐to‐moderate ventriculomegaly (95% CI: 0.3, 1.0). Isolated echogenic bowel was associated with an increased risk of congenital anomalies [risk ratio (RR) 4.54, 95% CI: 2.12, 9.73] and preterm birth (RR 2.30, 95% CI: 1.08, 4.90). Isolated pelvicalyceal dilatation was associated with an increased risk of congenital anomalies (RR 3.82, 95% CI: 2.16, 6.77). Multiple markers were associated with an increased risk of congenital anomalies (RR 5.00, 95% CI: 1.35, 18.40) and preterm birth (RR 3.38, 95% CI 1.20, 9.53). CONCLUSIONS: These data are useful for counselling families and developing clinical guidance and care pathways following the detection of markers in clinical practice, particularly the need for follow‐up scans to monitor placental function and growth in pregnancies with isolated echogenic bowel, and further investigation for multiple markers. © 2015 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4949529
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49495292016-07-28 Prevalence of defined ultrasound findings of unknown significance at the second trimester fetal anomaly scan and their association with adverse pregnancy outcomes: the Welsh study of mothers and babies population‐based cohort Hurt, Lisa Wright, Melissa Dunstan, Frank Thomas, Susan Brook, Fiona Morris, Susan Tucker, David Wills, Marilyn Ann Davies, Colin John, Gareth Fone, David Paranjothy, Shantini Prenat Diagn Original Articles OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article was to estimate the population prevalence of seven defined ultrasound findings of uncertain significance (‘markers’) in the second trimester and the associated risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. METHOD: A prospective record‐linked cohort study of 30 078 pregnant women who had second trimester anomaly scans between July 2008 and March 2011 in Wales was conducted. RESULTS: The prevalence of markers ranged from 43.7 per 1000 singleton pregnancies for cardiac echogenic foci [95% confidence interval (CI): 38.8, 51.1] to 0.6 for mild‐to‐moderate ventriculomegaly (95% CI: 0.3, 1.0). Isolated echogenic bowel was associated with an increased risk of congenital anomalies [risk ratio (RR) 4.54, 95% CI: 2.12, 9.73] and preterm birth (RR 2.30, 95% CI: 1.08, 4.90). Isolated pelvicalyceal dilatation was associated with an increased risk of congenital anomalies (RR 3.82, 95% CI: 2.16, 6.77). Multiple markers were associated with an increased risk of congenital anomalies (RR 5.00, 95% CI: 1.35, 18.40) and preterm birth (RR 3.38, 95% CI 1.20, 9.53). CONCLUSIONS: These data are useful for counselling families and developing clinical guidance and care pathways following the detection of markers in clinical practice, particularly the need for follow‐up scans to monitor placental function and growth in pregnancies with isolated echogenic bowel, and further investigation for multiple markers. © 2015 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-11-20 2016-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4949529/ /pubmed/26475362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.4708 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Hurt, Lisa
Wright, Melissa
Dunstan, Frank
Thomas, Susan
Brook, Fiona
Morris, Susan
Tucker, David
Wills, Marilyn Ann
Davies, Colin
John, Gareth
Fone, David
Paranjothy, Shantini
Prevalence of defined ultrasound findings of unknown significance at the second trimester fetal anomaly scan and their association with adverse pregnancy outcomes: the Welsh study of mothers and babies population‐based cohort
title Prevalence of defined ultrasound findings of unknown significance at the second trimester fetal anomaly scan and their association with adverse pregnancy outcomes: the Welsh study of mothers and babies population‐based cohort
title_full Prevalence of defined ultrasound findings of unknown significance at the second trimester fetal anomaly scan and their association with adverse pregnancy outcomes: the Welsh study of mothers and babies population‐based cohort
title_fullStr Prevalence of defined ultrasound findings of unknown significance at the second trimester fetal anomaly scan and their association with adverse pregnancy outcomes: the Welsh study of mothers and babies population‐based cohort
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of defined ultrasound findings of unknown significance at the second trimester fetal anomaly scan and their association with adverse pregnancy outcomes: the Welsh study of mothers and babies population‐based cohort
title_short Prevalence of defined ultrasound findings of unknown significance at the second trimester fetal anomaly scan and their association with adverse pregnancy outcomes: the Welsh study of mothers and babies population‐based cohort
title_sort prevalence of defined ultrasound findings of unknown significance at the second trimester fetal anomaly scan and their association with adverse pregnancy outcomes: the welsh study of mothers and babies population‐based cohort
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4949529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26475362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.4708
work_keys_str_mv AT hurtlisa prevalenceofdefinedultrasoundfindingsofunknownsignificanceatthesecondtrimesterfetalanomalyscanandtheirassociationwithadversepregnancyoutcomesthewelshstudyofmothersandbabiespopulationbasedcohort
AT wrightmelissa prevalenceofdefinedultrasoundfindingsofunknownsignificanceatthesecondtrimesterfetalanomalyscanandtheirassociationwithadversepregnancyoutcomesthewelshstudyofmothersandbabiespopulationbasedcohort
AT dunstanfrank prevalenceofdefinedultrasoundfindingsofunknownsignificanceatthesecondtrimesterfetalanomalyscanandtheirassociationwithadversepregnancyoutcomesthewelshstudyofmothersandbabiespopulationbasedcohort
AT thomassusan prevalenceofdefinedultrasoundfindingsofunknownsignificanceatthesecondtrimesterfetalanomalyscanandtheirassociationwithadversepregnancyoutcomesthewelshstudyofmothersandbabiespopulationbasedcohort
AT brookfiona prevalenceofdefinedultrasoundfindingsofunknownsignificanceatthesecondtrimesterfetalanomalyscanandtheirassociationwithadversepregnancyoutcomesthewelshstudyofmothersandbabiespopulationbasedcohort
AT morrissusan prevalenceofdefinedultrasoundfindingsofunknownsignificanceatthesecondtrimesterfetalanomalyscanandtheirassociationwithadversepregnancyoutcomesthewelshstudyofmothersandbabiespopulationbasedcohort
AT tuckerdavid prevalenceofdefinedultrasoundfindingsofunknownsignificanceatthesecondtrimesterfetalanomalyscanandtheirassociationwithadversepregnancyoutcomesthewelshstudyofmothersandbabiespopulationbasedcohort
AT willsmarilynann prevalenceofdefinedultrasoundfindingsofunknownsignificanceatthesecondtrimesterfetalanomalyscanandtheirassociationwithadversepregnancyoutcomesthewelshstudyofmothersandbabiespopulationbasedcohort
AT daviescolin prevalenceofdefinedultrasoundfindingsofunknownsignificanceatthesecondtrimesterfetalanomalyscanandtheirassociationwithadversepregnancyoutcomesthewelshstudyofmothersandbabiespopulationbasedcohort
AT johngareth prevalenceofdefinedultrasoundfindingsofunknownsignificanceatthesecondtrimesterfetalanomalyscanandtheirassociationwithadversepregnancyoutcomesthewelshstudyofmothersandbabiespopulationbasedcohort
AT fonedavid prevalenceofdefinedultrasoundfindingsofunknownsignificanceatthesecondtrimesterfetalanomalyscanandtheirassociationwithadversepregnancyoutcomesthewelshstudyofmothersandbabiespopulationbasedcohort
AT paranjothyshantini prevalenceofdefinedultrasoundfindingsofunknownsignificanceatthesecondtrimesterfetalanomalyscanandtheirassociationwithadversepregnancyoutcomesthewelshstudyofmothersandbabiespopulationbasedcohort