Cargando…

Distribution of the c‐MYC gene product in colorectal neoplasia

AIMS: Recent attempts to study MYC distribution in human samples have been confounded by a lack of agreement in immunohistochemical staining between antibodies targeting the N‐terminus and those targeting the C‐terminus of the MYC protein. The aim of this study was to use a novel in‐situ hybridizati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baker, Ann‐Marie, Van Noorden, Susan, Rodriguez‐Justo, Manuel, Cohen, Patrizia, Wright, Nicholas A, Lampert, Irvin A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4949543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26826706
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/his.12939
Descripción
Sumario:AIMS: Recent attempts to study MYC distribution in human samples have been confounded by a lack of agreement in immunohistochemical staining between antibodies targeting the N‐terminus and those targeting the C‐terminus of the MYC protein. The aim of this study was to use a novel in‐situ hybridization (ISH) approach to detect MYC mRNA in clinically relevant samples, and thereby determine the reliability of MYC‐targeting antibodies. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed immunohistochemistry on human formalin‐fixed paraffin embedded normal colon (n = 15), hyperplastic polyp (n = 4) and neoplastic colon samples (n = 55), using the N‐terminally directed antibody Y69, and the C‐terminally directed antibody 9E10. The MYC protein distributions were then compared with the location of MYC mRNA, determined by ISH. We found that the localization of MYC mRNA correlated well with the protein distribution determined with the N‐terminally directed antibody Y69, and was also associated with expression of the proliferation marker Ki67. The protein distribution determined with the C‐terminally directed antibody 9E10 was not always associated with MYC mRNA, Y69, or Ki67, and indeed often showed a reciprocal pattern of expression, with staining being strongest in non‐proliferating cells. CONCLUSIONS: The observed discrepancy between the staining patterns suggests that the significance of 9E10 in immunohistochemical staining is currently uncertain, and therefore should be interpreted with caution.