Cargando…

Does the pressure dependence of kinetic isotope effects report usefully on dynamics in enzyme H‐transfer reactions?

The temperature dependence of kinetic isotope effects (KIEs) has emerged as the main experimental probe of enzymatic H‐transfer by quantum tunnelling. Implicit in the interpretation is a presumed role for dynamic coupling of H‐transfer chemistry to the protein environment, the so‐called ‘promoting m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoeven, Robin, Heyes, Derren J., Hay, Sam, Scrutton, Nigel S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4949571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25581554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/febs.13193
_version_ 1782443454690754560
author Hoeven, Robin
Heyes, Derren J.
Hay, Sam
Scrutton, Nigel S.
author_facet Hoeven, Robin
Heyes, Derren J.
Hay, Sam
Scrutton, Nigel S.
author_sort Hoeven, Robin
collection PubMed
description The temperature dependence of kinetic isotope effects (KIEs) has emerged as the main experimental probe of enzymatic H‐transfer by quantum tunnelling. Implicit in the interpretation is a presumed role for dynamic coupling of H‐transfer chemistry to the protein environment, the so‐called ‘promoting motions/vibrations hypothesis’. This idea remains contentious, and others have questioned the importance and/or existence of promoting motions/vibrations. New experimental methods of addressing this problem are emerging, including use of mass‐modulated enzymes and time‐resolved spectroscopy. The pressure dependence of KIEs has been considered as a potential probe of quantum tunnelling reactions, because semi‐classical KIEs, which are defined by differences in zero‐point vibrational energy, are relatively insensitive to kbar changes in pressure. Reported combined pressure and temperature (p‐T) dependence studies of H‐transfer reactions are, however, limited. Here, we extend and review the available p‐T studies that have utilized well‐defined experimental systems in which quantum mechanical tunnelling is established. These include flavoproteins, quinoproteins, light‐activated enzymes and chemical model systems. We show that there is no clear general trend between the p‐T dependencies of the KIEs in these systems. Given the complex nature of p‐T studies, we conclude that computational simulations using determined (e.g. X‐ray) structures are also needed alongside experimental measurements of reaction rates/KIEs to guide the interpretation of p‐T effects. In providing new insight into H‐transfer/environmental coupling, combined approaches that unite both atomistic understanding with experimental rate measurements will require careful evaluation on a case‐by‐case basis. Although individually informative, we conclude that p‐T studies do not provide the more generalized insight that has come from studies of the temperature dependence of KIEs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4949571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49495712016-07-28 Does the pressure dependence of kinetic isotope effects report usefully on dynamics in enzyme H‐transfer reactions? Hoeven, Robin Heyes, Derren J. Hay, Sam Scrutton, Nigel S. FEBS J Original Articles The temperature dependence of kinetic isotope effects (KIEs) has emerged as the main experimental probe of enzymatic H‐transfer by quantum tunnelling. Implicit in the interpretation is a presumed role for dynamic coupling of H‐transfer chemistry to the protein environment, the so‐called ‘promoting motions/vibrations hypothesis’. This idea remains contentious, and others have questioned the importance and/or existence of promoting motions/vibrations. New experimental methods of addressing this problem are emerging, including use of mass‐modulated enzymes and time‐resolved spectroscopy. The pressure dependence of KIEs has been considered as a potential probe of quantum tunnelling reactions, because semi‐classical KIEs, which are defined by differences in zero‐point vibrational energy, are relatively insensitive to kbar changes in pressure. Reported combined pressure and temperature (p‐T) dependence studies of H‐transfer reactions are, however, limited. Here, we extend and review the available p‐T studies that have utilized well‐defined experimental systems in which quantum mechanical tunnelling is established. These include flavoproteins, quinoproteins, light‐activated enzymes and chemical model systems. We show that there is no clear general trend between the p‐T dependencies of the KIEs in these systems. Given the complex nature of p‐T studies, we conclude that computational simulations using determined (e.g. X‐ray) structures are also needed alongside experimental measurements of reaction rates/KIEs to guide the interpretation of p‐T effects. In providing new insight into H‐transfer/environmental coupling, combined approaches that unite both atomistic understanding with experimental rate measurements will require careful evaluation on a case‐by‐case basis. Although individually informative, we conclude that p‐T studies do not provide the more generalized insight that has come from studies of the temperature dependence of KIEs. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-08 2015-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4949571/ /pubmed/25581554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/febs.13193 Text en © 2015 The Authors. FEBS Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of FEBS. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Hoeven, Robin
Heyes, Derren J.
Hay, Sam
Scrutton, Nigel S.
Does the pressure dependence of kinetic isotope effects report usefully on dynamics in enzyme H‐transfer reactions?
title Does the pressure dependence of kinetic isotope effects report usefully on dynamics in enzyme H‐transfer reactions?
title_full Does the pressure dependence of kinetic isotope effects report usefully on dynamics in enzyme H‐transfer reactions?
title_fullStr Does the pressure dependence of kinetic isotope effects report usefully on dynamics in enzyme H‐transfer reactions?
title_full_unstemmed Does the pressure dependence of kinetic isotope effects report usefully on dynamics in enzyme H‐transfer reactions?
title_short Does the pressure dependence of kinetic isotope effects report usefully on dynamics in enzyme H‐transfer reactions?
title_sort does the pressure dependence of kinetic isotope effects report usefully on dynamics in enzyme h‐transfer reactions?
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4949571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25581554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/febs.13193
work_keys_str_mv AT hoevenrobin doesthepressuredependenceofkineticisotopeeffectsreportusefullyondynamicsinenzymehtransferreactions
AT heyesderrenj doesthepressuredependenceofkineticisotopeeffectsreportusefullyondynamicsinenzymehtransferreactions
AT haysam doesthepressuredependenceofkineticisotopeeffectsreportusefullyondynamicsinenzymehtransferreactions
AT scruttonnigels doesthepressuredependenceofkineticisotopeeffectsreportusefullyondynamicsinenzymehtransferreactions