Cargando…

Does multiple paternity influence offspring disease resistance?

It has been suggested that polyandry allows females to increase offspring genetic diversity and reduce the prevalence and susceptibility of their offspring to infectious diseases. We tested this hypothesis in wild‐derived house mice (Mus musculus) by experimentally infecting the offspring from 15 si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thonhauser, K. E., Raveh, S., Thoß, M., Penn, D. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4949575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26949230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12854
_version_ 1782443455139545088
author Thonhauser, K. E.
Raveh, S.
Thoß, M.
Penn, D. J.
author_facet Thonhauser, K. E.
Raveh, S.
Thoß, M.
Penn, D. J.
author_sort Thonhauser, K. E.
collection PubMed
description It has been suggested that polyandry allows females to increase offspring genetic diversity and reduce the prevalence and susceptibility of their offspring to infectious diseases. We tested this hypothesis in wild‐derived house mice (Mus musculus) by experimentally infecting the offspring from 15 single‐ and 15 multiple‐sired litters with two different strains of a mouse pathogen (Salmonella Typhimurium) and compared their ability to control infection. We found a high variation in individual infection resistance (measured with pathogen loads) and significant differences among families, suggesting genetic effects on Salmonella resistance, but we found no difference in prevalence or infection resistance between single‐ vs. multiple‐sired litters. We found a significant sex difference in infection resistance, but surprisingly, males were more resistant to infection than females. Also, infection resistance was correlated with weight loss during infection, although only for females, indicating that susceptibility to infection had more harmful health consequences for females than for males. To our knowledge, our findings provide the first evidence for sex‐dependent resistance to Salmonella infection in house mice. Our results do not support the hypothesis that multiple‐sired litters are more likely to survive infection than single‐sired litters; however, as we explain, additional studies are required before ruling out this hypothesis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4949575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49495752016-07-28 Does multiple paternity influence offspring disease resistance? Thonhauser, K. E. Raveh, S. Thoß, M. Penn, D. J. J Evol Biol Research Papers It has been suggested that polyandry allows females to increase offspring genetic diversity and reduce the prevalence and susceptibility of their offspring to infectious diseases. We tested this hypothesis in wild‐derived house mice (Mus musculus) by experimentally infecting the offspring from 15 single‐ and 15 multiple‐sired litters with two different strains of a mouse pathogen (Salmonella Typhimurium) and compared their ability to control infection. We found a high variation in individual infection resistance (measured with pathogen loads) and significant differences among families, suggesting genetic effects on Salmonella resistance, but we found no difference in prevalence or infection resistance between single‐ vs. multiple‐sired litters. We found a significant sex difference in infection resistance, but surprisingly, males were more resistant to infection than females. Also, infection resistance was correlated with weight loss during infection, although only for females, indicating that susceptibility to infection had more harmful health consequences for females than for males. To our knowledge, our findings provide the first evidence for sex‐dependent resistance to Salmonella infection in house mice. Our results do not support the hypothesis that multiple‐sired litters are more likely to survive infection than single‐sired litters; however, as we explain, additional studies are required before ruling out this hypothesis. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-03-29 2016-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4949575/ /pubmed/26949230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12854 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society for Evolutionary Biology. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Papers
Thonhauser, K. E.
Raveh, S.
Thoß, M.
Penn, D. J.
Does multiple paternity influence offspring disease resistance?
title Does multiple paternity influence offspring disease resistance?
title_full Does multiple paternity influence offspring disease resistance?
title_fullStr Does multiple paternity influence offspring disease resistance?
title_full_unstemmed Does multiple paternity influence offspring disease resistance?
title_short Does multiple paternity influence offspring disease resistance?
title_sort does multiple paternity influence offspring disease resistance?
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4949575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26949230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12854
work_keys_str_mv AT thonhauserke doesmultiplepaternityinfluenceoffspringdiseaseresistance
AT ravehs doesmultiplepaternityinfluenceoffspringdiseaseresistance
AT thoßm doesmultiplepaternityinfluenceoffspringdiseaseresistance
AT penndj doesmultiplepaternityinfluenceoffspringdiseaseresistance