Cargando…

Is it necessary to actively remove stone fragments during retrograde intrarenal surgery?

PURPOSE: Based on the experiences of our center, we sought to verify the necessity of actively removing stones during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for the management of renal stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March 2010 to March 2015, 248 patients underwent RIRS at our center. We classifie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, You Jin, Bak, Dong Jae, Chung, Jae-Wook, Lee, Jun Nyung, Kim, Hyun Tae, Yoo, Eun Sang, Kim, Bum Soo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Urological Association 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4949691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27437537
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2016.57.4.274
_version_ 1782443476111065088
author Lee, You Jin
Bak, Dong Jae
Chung, Jae-Wook
Lee, Jun Nyung
Kim, Hyun Tae
Yoo, Eun Sang
Kim, Bum Soo
author_facet Lee, You Jin
Bak, Dong Jae
Chung, Jae-Wook
Lee, Jun Nyung
Kim, Hyun Tae
Yoo, Eun Sang
Kim, Bum Soo
author_sort Lee, You Jin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Based on the experiences of our center, we sought to verify the necessity of actively removing stones during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for the management of renal stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March 2010 to March 2015, 248 patients underwent RIRS at our center. We classified these patients into 2 groups according to the performance of active stone removal; group A (n=172) included the patients whose stones were actively removed using a stone basket, and group B (n=76) included the patients whose stones were fragmented with laser lithotripsy without active removal of the fragments. We retrospectively compared the operation time, success rate, and complication rate between the 2 groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups A and B in terms of mean age (56.1 years vs. 58.6 years), male to female ratio (115:57 vs. 46:30), mean body mass index (24.5 kg/m(2) vs. 25.0 kg/m(2)), mean preoperative size of stone (11.1 mm vs. 11.1 mm), the ratio of unilateral and bilateral stones (136:36 vs. 64:12), success rate (89.0% vs. 86.8%), operation time (82.5 minutes vs. 82.1 minutes), overall complication rate (9.9% vs. 11.8%), incidence of febrile urinary tract infection (6.4% vs. 2.6%), gross hematuria (1.7% vs. 2.6%), or postoperative de novo hydronephrosis (2.9% vs. 5.3%). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that during RIRS, fragmentation only, without the active removal of stones, is a safe and effective technique in which the surgical outcomes are comparable to those of procedures involving the active removal of stones.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4949691
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Korean Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49496912016-07-19 Is it necessary to actively remove stone fragments during retrograde intrarenal surgery? Lee, You Jin Bak, Dong Jae Chung, Jae-Wook Lee, Jun Nyung Kim, Hyun Tae Yoo, Eun Sang Kim, Bum Soo Investig Clin Urol Original Article PURPOSE: Based on the experiences of our center, we sought to verify the necessity of actively removing stones during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for the management of renal stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March 2010 to March 2015, 248 patients underwent RIRS at our center. We classified these patients into 2 groups according to the performance of active stone removal; group A (n=172) included the patients whose stones were actively removed using a stone basket, and group B (n=76) included the patients whose stones were fragmented with laser lithotripsy without active removal of the fragments. We retrospectively compared the operation time, success rate, and complication rate between the 2 groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups A and B in terms of mean age (56.1 years vs. 58.6 years), male to female ratio (115:57 vs. 46:30), mean body mass index (24.5 kg/m(2) vs. 25.0 kg/m(2)), mean preoperative size of stone (11.1 mm vs. 11.1 mm), the ratio of unilateral and bilateral stones (136:36 vs. 64:12), success rate (89.0% vs. 86.8%), operation time (82.5 minutes vs. 82.1 minutes), overall complication rate (9.9% vs. 11.8%), incidence of febrile urinary tract infection (6.4% vs. 2.6%), gross hematuria (1.7% vs. 2.6%), or postoperative de novo hydronephrosis (2.9% vs. 5.3%). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that during RIRS, fragmentation only, without the active removal of stones, is a safe and effective technique in which the surgical outcomes are comparable to those of procedures involving the active removal of stones. The Korean Urological Association 2016-07 2016-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4949691/ /pubmed/27437537 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2016.57.4.274 Text en © The Korean Urological Association, 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, You Jin
Bak, Dong Jae
Chung, Jae-Wook
Lee, Jun Nyung
Kim, Hyun Tae
Yoo, Eun Sang
Kim, Bum Soo
Is it necessary to actively remove stone fragments during retrograde intrarenal surgery?
title Is it necessary to actively remove stone fragments during retrograde intrarenal surgery?
title_full Is it necessary to actively remove stone fragments during retrograde intrarenal surgery?
title_fullStr Is it necessary to actively remove stone fragments during retrograde intrarenal surgery?
title_full_unstemmed Is it necessary to actively remove stone fragments during retrograde intrarenal surgery?
title_short Is it necessary to actively remove stone fragments during retrograde intrarenal surgery?
title_sort is it necessary to actively remove stone fragments during retrograde intrarenal surgery?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4949691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27437537
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2016.57.4.274
work_keys_str_mv AT leeyoujin isitnecessarytoactivelyremovestonefragmentsduringretrogradeintrarenalsurgery
AT bakdongjae isitnecessarytoactivelyremovestonefragmentsduringretrogradeintrarenalsurgery
AT chungjaewook isitnecessarytoactivelyremovestonefragmentsduringretrogradeintrarenalsurgery
AT leejunnyung isitnecessarytoactivelyremovestonefragmentsduringretrogradeintrarenalsurgery
AT kimhyuntae isitnecessarytoactivelyremovestonefragmentsduringretrogradeintrarenalsurgery
AT yooeunsang isitnecessarytoactivelyremovestonefragmentsduringretrogradeintrarenalsurgery
AT kimbumsoo isitnecessarytoactivelyremovestonefragmentsduringretrogradeintrarenalsurgery