Cargando…
Which sets of elementary flux modes form thermodynamically feasible flux distributions?
Elementary flux modes (EFMs) are non‐decomposable steady‐state fluxes through metabolic networks. Every possible flux through a network can be described as a superposition of EFMs. The definition of EFMs is based on the stoichiometry of the network, and it has been shown previously that not all EFMs...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4949704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26940826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/febs.13702 |
_version_ | 1782443479278813184 |
---|---|
author | Gerstl, Matthias P. Jungreuthmayer, Christian Müller, Stefan Zanghellini, Jürgen |
author_facet | Gerstl, Matthias P. Jungreuthmayer, Christian Müller, Stefan Zanghellini, Jürgen |
author_sort | Gerstl, Matthias P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Elementary flux modes (EFMs) are non‐decomposable steady‐state fluxes through metabolic networks. Every possible flux through a network can be described as a superposition of EFMs. The definition of EFMs is based on the stoichiometry of the network, and it has been shown previously that not all EFMs are thermodynamically feasible. These infeasible EFMs cannot contribute to a biologically meaningful flux distribution. In this work, we show that a set of thermodynamically feasible EFMs need not be thermodynamically consistent. We use first principles of thermodynamics to define the feasibility of a flux distribution and present a method to compute the largest thermodynamically consistent sets (LTCSs) of EFMs. An LTCS contains the maximum number of EFMs that can be combined to form a thermodynamically feasible flux distribution. As a case study we analyze all LTCSs found in Escherichia coli when grown on glucose and show that only one LTCS shows the required phenotypical properties. Using our method, we find that in our E. coli model < 10% of all EFMs are thermodynamically relevant. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4949704 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49497042016-07-28 Which sets of elementary flux modes form thermodynamically feasible flux distributions? Gerstl, Matthias P. Jungreuthmayer, Christian Müller, Stefan Zanghellini, Jürgen FEBS J Original Articles Elementary flux modes (EFMs) are non‐decomposable steady‐state fluxes through metabolic networks. Every possible flux through a network can be described as a superposition of EFMs. The definition of EFMs is based on the stoichiometry of the network, and it has been shown previously that not all EFMs are thermodynamically feasible. These infeasible EFMs cannot contribute to a biologically meaningful flux distribution. In this work, we show that a set of thermodynamically feasible EFMs need not be thermodynamically consistent. We use first principles of thermodynamics to define the feasibility of a flux distribution and present a method to compute the largest thermodynamically consistent sets (LTCSs) of EFMs. An LTCS contains the maximum number of EFMs that can be combined to form a thermodynamically feasible flux distribution. As a case study we analyze all LTCSs found in Escherichia coli when grown on glucose and show that only one LTCS shows the required phenotypical properties. Using our method, we find that in our E. coli model < 10% of all EFMs are thermodynamically relevant. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-03-31 2016-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4949704/ /pubmed/26940826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/febs.13702 Text en © 2016 The Authors. The FEBS Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Federation of European Biochemical Societies. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Gerstl, Matthias P. Jungreuthmayer, Christian Müller, Stefan Zanghellini, Jürgen Which sets of elementary flux modes form thermodynamically feasible flux distributions? |
title | Which sets of elementary flux modes form thermodynamically feasible flux distributions? |
title_full | Which sets of elementary flux modes form thermodynamically feasible flux distributions? |
title_fullStr | Which sets of elementary flux modes form thermodynamically feasible flux distributions? |
title_full_unstemmed | Which sets of elementary flux modes form thermodynamically feasible flux distributions? |
title_short | Which sets of elementary flux modes form thermodynamically feasible flux distributions? |
title_sort | which sets of elementary flux modes form thermodynamically feasible flux distributions? |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4949704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26940826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/febs.13702 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gerstlmatthiasp whichsetsofelementaryfluxmodesformthermodynamicallyfeasiblefluxdistributions AT jungreuthmayerchristian whichsetsofelementaryfluxmodesformthermodynamicallyfeasiblefluxdistributions AT mullerstefan whichsetsofelementaryfluxmodesformthermodynamicallyfeasiblefluxdistributions AT zanghellinijurgen whichsetsofelementaryfluxmodesformthermodynamicallyfeasiblefluxdistributions |