Cargando…
A review on regional convection‐permitting climate modeling: Demonstrations, prospects, and challenges
Regional climate modeling using convection‐permitting models (CPMs; horizontal grid spacing <4 km) emerges as a promising framework to provide more reliable climate information on regional to local scales compared to traditionally used large‐scale models (LSMs; horizontal grid spacing >10 km)....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4949718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27478878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014RG000475 |
_version_ | 1782443482285080576 |
---|---|
author | Prein, Andreas F. Langhans, Wolfgang Fosser, Giorgia Ferrone, Andrew Ban, Nikolina Goergen, Klaus Keller, Michael Tölle, Merja Gutjahr, Oliver Feser, Frauke Brisson, Erwan Kollet, Stefan Schmidli, Juerg van Lipzig, Nicole P. M. Leung, Ruby |
author_facet | Prein, Andreas F. Langhans, Wolfgang Fosser, Giorgia Ferrone, Andrew Ban, Nikolina Goergen, Klaus Keller, Michael Tölle, Merja Gutjahr, Oliver Feser, Frauke Brisson, Erwan Kollet, Stefan Schmidli, Juerg van Lipzig, Nicole P. M. Leung, Ruby |
author_sort | Prein, Andreas F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Regional climate modeling using convection‐permitting models (CPMs; horizontal grid spacing <4 km) emerges as a promising framework to provide more reliable climate information on regional to local scales compared to traditionally used large‐scale models (LSMs; horizontal grid spacing >10 km). CPMs no longer rely on convection parameterization schemes, which had been identified as a major source of errors and uncertainties in LSMs. Moreover, CPMs allow for a more accurate representation of surface and orography fields. The drawback of CPMs is the high demand on computational resources. For this reason, first CPM climate simulations only appeared a decade ago. In this study, we aim to provide a common basis for CPM climate simulations by giving a holistic review of the topic. The most important components in CPMs such as physical parameterizations and dynamical formulations are discussed critically. An overview of weaknesses and an outlook on required future developments is provided. Most importantly, this review presents the consolidated outcome of studies that addressed the added value of CPM climate simulations compared to LSMs. Improvements are evident mostly for climate statistics related to deep convection, mountainous regions, or extreme events. The climate change signals of CPM simulations suggest an increase in flash floods, changes in hail storm characteristics, and reductions in the snowpack over mountains. In conclusion, CPMs are a very promising tool for future climate research. However, coordinated modeling programs are crucially needed to advance parameterizations of unresolved physics and to assess the full potential of CPMs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4949718 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49497182016-07-28 A review on regional convection‐permitting climate modeling: Demonstrations, prospects, and challenges Prein, Andreas F. Langhans, Wolfgang Fosser, Giorgia Ferrone, Andrew Ban, Nikolina Goergen, Klaus Keller, Michael Tölle, Merja Gutjahr, Oliver Feser, Frauke Brisson, Erwan Kollet, Stefan Schmidli, Juerg van Lipzig, Nicole P. M. Leung, Ruby Rev Geophys Review Articles Regional climate modeling using convection‐permitting models (CPMs; horizontal grid spacing <4 km) emerges as a promising framework to provide more reliable climate information on regional to local scales compared to traditionally used large‐scale models (LSMs; horizontal grid spacing >10 km). CPMs no longer rely on convection parameterization schemes, which had been identified as a major source of errors and uncertainties in LSMs. Moreover, CPMs allow for a more accurate representation of surface and orography fields. The drawback of CPMs is the high demand on computational resources. For this reason, first CPM climate simulations only appeared a decade ago. In this study, we aim to provide a common basis for CPM climate simulations by giving a holistic review of the topic. The most important components in CPMs such as physical parameterizations and dynamical formulations are discussed critically. An overview of weaknesses and an outlook on required future developments is provided. Most importantly, this review presents the consolidated outcome of studies that addressed the added value of CPM climate simulations compared to LSMs. Improvements are evident mostly for climate statistics related to deep convection, mountainous regions, or extreme events. The climate change signals of CPM simulations suggest an increase in flash floods, changes in hail storm characteristics, and reductions in the snowpack over mountains. In conclusion, CPMs are a very promising tool for future climate research. However, coordinated modeling programs are crucially needed to advance parameterizations of unresolved physics and to assess the full potential of CPMs. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-06 2015-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4949718/ /pubmed/27478878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014RG000475 Text en ©2015. The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Prein, Andreas F. Langhans, Wolfgang Fosser, Giorgia Ferrone, Andrew Ban, Nikolina Goergen, Klaus Keller, Michael Tölle, Merja Gutjahr, Oliver Feser, Frauke Brisson, Erwan Kollet, Stefan Schmidli, Juerg van Lipzig, Nicole P. M. Leung, Ruby A review on regional convection‐permitting climate modeling: Demonstrations, prospects, and challenges |
title | A review on regional convection‐permitting climate modeling: Demonstrations, prospects, and challenges |
title_full | A review on regional convection‐permitting climate modeling: Demonstrations, prospects, and challenges |
title_fullStr | A review on regional convection‐permitting climate modeling: Demonstrations, prospects, and challenges |
title_full_unstemmed | A review on regional convection‐permitting climate modeling: Demonstrations, prospects, and challenges |
title_short | A review on regional convection‐permitting climate modeling: Demonstrations, prospects, and challenges |
title_sort | review on regional convection‐permitting climate modeling: demonstrations, prospects, and challenges |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4949718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27478878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014RG000475 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT preinandreasf areviewonregionalconvectionpermittingclimatemodelingdemonstrationsprospectsandchallenges AT langhanswolfgang areviewonregionalconvectionpermittingclimatemodelingdemonstrationsprospectsandchallenges AT fossergiorgia areviewonregionalconvectionpermittingclimatemodelingdemonstrationsprospectsandchallenges AT ferroneandrew areviewonregionalconvectionpermittingclimatemodelingdemonstrationsprospectsandchallenges AT bannikolina areviewonregionalconvectionpermittingclimatemodelingdemonstrationsprospectsandchallenges AT goergenklaus areviewonregionalconvectionpermittingclimatemodelingdemonstrationsprospectsandchallenges AT kellermichael areviewonregionalconvectionpermittingclimatemodelingdemonstrationsprospectsandchallenges AT tollemerja areviewonregionalconvectionpermittingclimatemodelingdemonstrationsprospectsandchallenges AT gutjahroliver areviewonregionalconvectionpermittingclimatemodelingdemonstrationsprospectsandchallenges AT feserfrauke areviewonregionalconvectionpermittingclimatemodelingdemonstrationsprospectsandchallenges AT brissonerwan areviewonregionalconvectionpermittingclimatemodelingdemonstrationsprospectsandchallenges AT kolletstefan areviewonregionalconvectionpermittingclimatemodelingdemonstrationsprospectsandchallenges AT schmidlijuerg areviewonregionalconvectionpermittingclimatemodelingdemonstrationsprospectsandchallenges AT vanlipzignicolepm areviewonregionalconvectionpermittingclimatemodelingdemonstrationsprospectsandchallenges AT leungruby areviewonregionalconvectionpermittingclimatemodelingdemonstrationsprospectsandchallenges AT preinandreasf reviewonregionalconvectionpermittingclimatemodelingdemonstrationsprospectsandchallenges AT langhanswolfgang reviewonregionalconvectionpermittingclimatemodelingdemonstrationsprospectsandchallenges AT fossergiorgia reviewonregionalconvectionpermittingclimatemodelingdemonstrationsprospectsandchallenges AT ferroneandrew reviewonregionalconvectionpermittingclimatemodelingdemonstrationsprospectsandchallenges AT bannikolina reviewonregionalconvectionpermittingclimatemodelingdemonstrationsprospectsandchallenges AT goergenklaus reviewonregionalconvectionpermittingclimatemodelingdemonstrationsprospectsandchallenges AT kellermichael reviewonregionalconvectionpermittingclimatemodelingdemonstrationsprospectsandchallenges AT tollemerja reviewonregionalconvectionpermittingclimatemodelingdemonstrationsprospectsandchallenges AT gutjahroliver reviewonregionalconvectionpermittingclimatemodelingdemonstrationsprospectsandchallenges AT feserfrauke reviewonregionalconvectionpermittingclimatemodelingdemonstrationsprospectsandchallenges AT brissonerwan reviewonregionalconvectionpermittingclimatemodelingdemonstrationsprospectsandchallenges AT kolletstefan reviewonregionalconvectionpermittingclimatemodelingdemonstrationsprospectsandchallenges AT schmidlijuerg reviewonregionalconvectionpermittingclimatemodelingdemonstrationsprospectsandchallenges AT vanlipzignicolepm reviewonregionalconvectionpermittingclimatemodelingdemonstrationsprospectsandchallenges AT leungruby reviewonregionalconvectionpermittingclimatemodelingdemonstrationsprospectsandchallenges |