Cargando…

Typologies in GPs’ referral practice

BACKGROUND: GPs’ individual decisions to refer and the various ways of working when they refer are important determinants of secondary care use. The objective of this study was to explore and describe potential characteristics of GPs’ referral practice by investigating their opinions about referring...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thorsen, Olav, Hartveit, Miriam, Johannessen, Jan Olav, Fosse, Lars, Eide, Geir Egil, Schulz, Jörn, Bærheim, Anders
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4949760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27430983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0495-y
_version_ 1782443489581072384
author Thorsen, Olav
Hartveit, Miriam
Johannessen, Jan Olav
Fosse, Lars
Eide, Geir Egil
Schulz, Jörn
Bærheim, Anders
author_facet Thorsen, Olav
Hartveit, Miriam
Johannessen, Jan Olav
Fosse, Lars
Eide, Geir Egil
Schulz, Jörn
Bærheim, Anders
author_sort Thorsen, Olav
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: GPs’ individual decisions to refer and the various ways of working when they refer are important determinants of secondary care use. The objective of this study was to explore and describe potential characteristics of GPs’ referral practice by investigating their opinions about referring and their self-reported experiences of what they do when they refer. METHODS: Observational cross-sectional study using data from 128 Norwegian GPs who filled in a questionnaire with statements on how they regarded the referral process, and who were invited to collect data when they actually referred to hospital during one month. Only elective referrals were recorded. The 57 participants (44,5 %) recorded data from 691 referrals. The variables were included in a principal component analysis. A multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to identify typologies with GP’s age, gender, specialty in family medicine and location as independent variables. RESULTS: Eight principal components describe the different ways GPs think and work when they refer. Two typologies summarize these components: confidence characterizing specialists in family medicine, mainly female, who reported a more patient-centred practice making priority decisions when they refer, who confer easily with hospital consultants and who complete the referrals during the consultation; uncertainty characterizing young, mainly male non-specialists in family medicine, experiencing patients’ pressure to be referred, heavy workload, having reluctance to cooperate with the patient and reporting sparse contact with hospital colleagues. CONCLUSIONS: Training specialists in family medicine in patient-centred method, easy conference with hospital consultant and cooperation with patients while making the referral may foster both self-reflections on own competences and increased levels of confidence. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-016-0495-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4949760
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49497602016-07-20 Typologies in GPs’ referral practice Thorsen, Olav Hartveit, Miriam Johannessen, Jan Olav Fosse, Lars Eide, Geir Egil Schulz, Jörn Bærheim, Anders BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: GPs’ individual decisions to refer and the various ways of working when they refer are important determinants of secondary care use. The objective of this study was to explore and describe potential characteristics of GPs’ referral practice by investigating their opinions about referring and their self-reported experiences of what they do when they refer. METHODS: Observational cross-sectional study using data from 128 Norwegian GPs who filled in a questionnaire with statements on how they regarded the referral process, and who were invited to collect data when they actually referred to hospital during one month. Only elective referrals were recorded. The 57 participants (44,5 %) recorded data from 691 referrals. The variables were included in a principal component analysis. A multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to identify typologies with GP’s age, gender, specialty in family medicine and location as independent variables. RESULTS: Eight principal components describe the different ways GPs think and work when they refer. Two typologies summarize these components: confidence characterizing specialists in family medicine, mainly female, who reported a more patient-centred practice making priority decisions when they refer, who confer easily with hospital consultants and who complete the referrals during the consultation; uncertainty characterizing young, mainly male non-specialists in family medicine, experiencing patients’ pressure to be referred, heavy workload, having reluctance to cooperate with the patient and reporting sparse contact with hospital colleagues. CONCLUSIONS: Training specialists in family medicine in patient-centred method, easy conference with hospital consultant and cooperation with patients while making the referral may foster both self-reflections on own competences and increased levels of confidence. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-016-0495-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4949760/ /pubmed/27430983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0495-y Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Thorsen, Olav
Hartveit, Miriam
Johannessen, Jan Olav
Fosse, Lars
Eide, Geir Egil
Schulz, Jörn
Bærheim, Anders
Typologies in GPs’ referral practice
title Typologies in GPs’ referral practice
title_full Typologies in GPs’ referral practice
title_fullStr Typologies in GPs’ referral practice
title_full_unstemmed Typologies in GPs’ referral practice
title_short Typologies in GPs’ referral practice
title_sort typologies in gps’ referral practice
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4949760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27430983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0495-y
work_keys_str_mv AT thorsenolav typologiesingpsreferralpractice
AT hartveitmiriam typologiesingpsreferralpractice
AT johannessenjanolav typologiesingpsreferralpractice
AT fosselars typologiesingpsreferralpractice
AT eidegeiregil typologiesingpsreferralpractice
AT schulzjorn typologiesingpsreferralpractice
AT bærheimanders typologiesingpsreferralpractice